The rotation state of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from approach observations with the OSIRIS cameras on Rosetta

Aims: Approach observations with the Optical, Spectroscopic, and Infrared Remote Imaging System (OSIRIS) experiment onboard Rosetta are used to determine the rotation period, the direction of the spin axis, and the state of rotation of comet 67P's nucleus. Methods: Photometric time series of 67P have been acquired by OSIRIS since the post wake-up commissioning of the payload in March 2014. Fourier analysis and convex shape inversion methods have been applied to the Rosetta data as well to the available ground-based observations. Results: Evidence is found that the rotation rate of 67P has significantly changed near the time of its 2009 perihelion passage, probably due to sublimation-induced torque. We find that the sidereal rotation periods P1 = 12.76129 ± 0.00005 h and P2 = 12.4043 ± 0.0007 h for the apparitions before and after the 2009 perihelion, respectively, provide the best fit to the observations. No signs of multiple periodicity are found in the light curves down to the noise level, which implies that the comet is presently in a simple rotation state around its axis of largest moment of inertia. We derive a prograde rotation model with spin vector J2000 ecliptic coordinates λ = 65° ± 15°, β = + 59° ± 15°, corresponding to equatorial coordinates RA = 22°, Dec = + 76°. However, we find that the mirror solution, also prograde, at λ = 275° ± 15°, β = + 50° ± 15° (or RA = 274°, Dec = + 27°), is also possible at the same confidence level, due to the intrinsic ambiguity of the photometric problem for observations performed close to the ecliptic plane. Table 1 is available in electronic form at http://www.aanda.org

[1]  T. Farnham,et al.  A QUARTER-CENTURY OF OBSERVATIONS OF COMET 10P/TEMPEL 2 AT LOWELL OBSERVATORY: CONTINUED SPIN-DOWN, COMA MORPHOLOGY, PRODUCTION RATES, AND NUMERICAL MODELING , 2012, 1210.1228.

[2]  Mikko Kaasalainen,et al.  Inverse problems of generalized projection operators , 2006 .

[3]  M. Belton,et al.  An updated rotation model for Comet 9P/Tempel 1 , 2013 .

[4]  M. A’Hearn,et al.  Observational and dynamical constraints on the rotation of Comet P/Halley , 1991 .

[5]  G. Neukum,et al.  The Near-Earth Objects Follow-Up Program: First Results , 1995 .

[6]  D. Bramich,et al.  Beginning of activity in 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and predictions for 2014–2015 , 2013, 1307.7978.

[7]  S. Debei,et al.  OSIRIS – The Scientific Camera System Onboard Rosetta , 2007 .

[8]  Philippe Lamy,et al.  Outgassing-induced effects in the rotational state of comet 67P/Churyumov—Gerasimenko during the Rosetta mission , 2005 .

[9]  A. Fitzsimmons,et al.  The nucleus of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. A new shape model and thermophysical analysis , 2012 .

[10]  M. Kaasalainen,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope observations of the nucleus and inner coma of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2006 .

[11]  Hermann Boehnhardt,et al.  Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko at a large heliocentric distance , 2008 .

[12]  Karen J. Meech,et al.  The complex spin state of 103P/Hartley 2: Kinematics and orientation in space , 2013 .

[13]  A. Harris,et al.  Lightcurves and phase relations of the asteroids 82 alkmene and 444 Gyptis , 1984 .

[14]  Karri Muinonen,et al.  Optimization Methods for Asteroid Lightcurve Inversion. II. The Complete Inverse Problem , 2001 .

[15]  Nalin Samarasinha,et al.  RELATING CHANGES IN COMETARY ROTATION TO ACTIVITY: CURRENT STATUS AND APPLICATIONS TO COMET C/2012 S1 (ISON) , 2013 .

[16]  J. Ortiz,et al.  67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko at large heliocentric distance , 2011 .

[17]  M. Kaasalainen,et al.  Optimization Methods for Asteroid Lightcurve Inversion: I. Shape Determination , 2001 .

[18]  M. Kaasalainen,et al.  A Portrait of the Nucleus of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko , 2007 .

[19]  Noah Brosch,et al.  Stardust-NExT, Deep Impact, and the accelerating spin of 9P/Tempel 1 , 2011 .

[20]  Markku Poutanen,et al.  Photoelectric observations of asteroids 3, 24, 60, 261, and 863 , 1989 .