Radical innovation in established organizations: Being a knowledge predator

Considering the strategic importance of knowledge building as the roots of any radical innovation, this paper focuses on the particular position of established organizations, which are faced with the necessity to explore new and tacit knowledge, while simultaneously exploiting existing competitive advantages depending on their existing knowledge and skills. To manage this paradox, established organizations can find help in partnerships with explorative organizations complementing their exploitative core competencies. With the well-known Lotka-Volterra system, I propose a simple model to demonstrate that a predation relationship is the most relevant to acquire new knowledge from partners and thus allow radical innovation.

[1]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[2]  J. Gans,et al.  The Product Market and the Market for 'Ideas': Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[3]  A. J. Lotka,et al.  Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.

[4]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[5]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  Sources of new product ideas and creativity practices in the UK textile industry , 2002 .

[6]  J. Sterman.  Business Dynamics , 2000 .

[7]  G. O'Connor,et al.  The human side of radical innovation , 2004 .

[8]  M. Tushman,et al.  Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and Their Antecedents , 1981 .

[9]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[10]  Jesus Ramos-Martin,et al.  Empiricism in ecological economics: a perspective from complex systems theory , 2003 .

[11]  Nicolas Jonard,et al.  Knowledge Dynamics in a Network Industry , 2004 .

[12]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective , 2003 .

[13]  Kurt A. Heppard,et al.  An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation , 2003 .

[14]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  The learning curve: a new perspective , 2000 .

[15]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[16]  F. E..  Principles of Economics , 1890, Nature.

[17]  Lars Huemer,et al.  Balancing between stability and variety: Identity and trust trade-offs in networks , 2004 .

[18]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[19]  Robert W. Lucky,et al.  What We've Learned: Managing Physical Resources—I: Computers and Communications , 1988 .

[20]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence , 2001 .

[21]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[22]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Multi-mode interaction among technologies , 1997 .

[23]  F. Hayek.  The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[24]  S. Ottosson.  Participation action research-: A key to improved knowledge of management , 2003 .

[25]  Gerald Silverberg,et al.  The discrete charm of the bourgeoisie: quantum and continuous perspectives on innovation and growth , 2002 .

[26]  Paul Strebel,et al.  Creating industry breakpoints: Changing the rules of the game , 1995 .

[27]  Ronald Mascitelli.  From Experience: Harnessing Tacit Knowledge to Achieve Breakthrough Innovation , 2000 .

[28]  R. Chiva-Gomez,et al.  Repercussions of complex adaptive systems on product design management , 2004 .

[29]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[30]  Pia Hurmelinna,et al.  Playing the collaboration game right—balancing trust and contracting , 2005 .

[31]  G. Mitchell,et al.  Managing R&D as A Strategic Option , 1988 .

[32]  B. Quélin,et al.  Core competencies, R&D management and partnerships , 2000 .

[33]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[34]  Pierpaolo Andriani,et al.  Managing knowledge associated with innovation , 2003 .

[35]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[36]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[37]  Peter M. Senge,et al.  Bookshelf - High Output Management, Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies, The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization , 2006, IEEE Softw..

[38]  T. Modis,et al.  Genetic re-engineering of corporations , 1997 .

[39]  K. Arrow.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[40]  J. Swan,et al.  Trust and inter-organizational networking , 2000 .

[41]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The new productivity challenge. , 1991 .

[42]  Mary Ann Glynn,et al.  Creativity and technological learning: the roles of organization architecture and crisis in large-scale projects , 2000 .

[43]  Charles Despres,et al.  Chapter 3 – AThematic Analysis of the Thinking in Knowledge Management , 2000 .

[44]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[45]  Jorge Niosi.  Fourth-Generation R&D: From Linear Models to Flexible Innovation , 1999 .

[46]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues , 2002 .

[47]  David B. Pratt,et al.  Analysis of the Lotka–Volterra competition equations as a technological substitution model , 2003 .

[48]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.