Verification and Validation of Viswalk for Building Evacuation Modelling

This thesis is evaluating the pedestrian modelling software Viswalk for the use as a building evacuation model, by verifying and validating the model. In the verification, a procedure from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is used as a basis to assess Viswalk’s ability to represent pre-evacuation time, movement and navigation, exit usage, route availability and flow constraints. Seven tests are excluded due to delimitations of the thesis or limitations of the current version of the model. The verification tests show that Viswalk is able to represent the main core components of evacuation models that are under consideration. The model yields results that correspond with the expected results for all 10 verification tests that are performed. However, non-conservative flow rates can be obtained if the default input settings are used. In the validation, results from Viswalk are compared to four real life experiments including a corridor, a classroom, a theatre lobby and a stair, followed by an uncertainty analysis. With adjusted input settings the movement times deviate with 2-16 % from the experiments and with default input settings the movement times deviate with 12-95 %. The walking speed is an important parameter in the validation tests, even with substantial congestion, with up to 46 % increased movement times when the walking speeds are decreased with 25 %. In the validation it is also noted that the occupant densities in front of openings can differ with up to 45 % between the simulations and the experiments. Despite the aspects described above, results that are close to experimental results can be obtained if the user has a good estimation of the occupant demographics and is aware of the limitations of the model.

[1]  Tobias Kretz,et al.  Multi-Directional Flow as Touch-Stone to Assess Models of Pedestrian Dynamics , 2012, ArXiv.

[2]  Helbing,et al.  Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[3]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  An Investigation of the Aspects of Occupant Behavior Required for Evacuation Modeling , 1998 .

[4]  Peter Vortisch,et al.  Quickest Paths in Simulations of Pedestrians , 2011, Adv. Complex Syst..

[5]  Oskar Kryh Mikrosimulering av fotgängare En parameterstudie utgående ifrån simuleringar, beräkningar och fältstudier , 2013 .

[6]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[7]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  Employing validation and verification tests as an integral part of evacuation model development. , 2013 .

[8]  Leonard Y. Cooper A concept for estimating available safe egress time in fires , 1983 .

[9]  Lars Harms-Ringdahl,et al.  Relationships between accident investigations, risk analysis, and safety management. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[10]  T. Aven,et al.  On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain , 2009 .

[11]  S. L. Poon,et al.  A Dynamic Approach to ASET/RSET Assessment in Performance based Design , 2014 .

[12]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  The Process of Verification and Validation of Building Fire Evacuation Models , 2013 .

[13]  Kevin B. McGrattan,et al.  Verification and Validation of Selected Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications. Volume 2. Experimental Uncertainty (NUREG 1824) | NIST , 2007 .

[14]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[15]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Specification of the Social Force Pedestrian Model by Evolutionary Adjustment to Video Tracking Data , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..

[16]  J. D. Sime Perceived Time Available: The Margin Of Safety In Fires , 1986 .

[17]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Pedestrian, Crowd and Evacuation Dynamics , 2013, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[18]  Enrico Ronchi THE NEED FOR A VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION PROTOCOL FOR EVACUATION MODELS , 2014 .

[19]  Maximino Aldana,et al.  Phase Transitions in Self-Driven Many-Particle Systems and Related Non-Equilibrium Models: A Network Approach , 2003 .

[20]  Hubert Klüpfel,et al.  RiMEA: A Way to Define a Standard for Evacuation Calculations , 2014 .

[21]  Håkan Frantzich,et al.  Handbok för riskanalys , 2003 .

[22]  Tobias Kretz,et al.  The Effect of Integrating Travel Time , 2012, 1204.5100.

[23]  M. Schreckenberg,et al.  Experimental study of pedestrian flow through a bottleneck , 2006, physics/0610077.

[24]  Bernhard Steffen,et al.  New Insights into Pedestrian Flow Through Bottlenecks , 2009, Transp. Sci..

[25]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  The validation of evacuation simulation models through the analysis of behavioural uncertainty , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  Erica D. Kuligowski,et al.  A Review of Building Evacuation Models, 2nd Edition | NIST , 2010 .

[27]  Brian J. Meacham,et al.  Guide for Evaluating the Predictive Capabilities of Computer Egress Models. | NIST , 2005 .

[28]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[29]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  A Method for the Analysis of Behavioural Uncertainty in Evacuation Modelling , 2014 .