A comparison of visual and haptic object representations based on similarity

Do we judge similarity between two objects to be the same using touch and vision? We investigated this using psychophysical experiments in which subjects rated the similarity between objects presented either visually or haptically. The stimuli were a family of novel, three-dimensional objects whose microgeometry ("texture") and macrogeometry ("shape") were parametrically varied. Multidimensional scaling of the similarity data was used to reconstruct haptic and visual perceptual spaces. For both modalities, a two-dimensional perceptual space was found whose dimensions clearly corresponded to shape and texture. Interestingly, shape dominated in visual space, whereas both shape and texture were important in haptic space. Furthermore, stimuli clusters were observed in this space, suggesting the emergence of category structure based on similarity relationships. The same category boundaries were confirmed in a visual free sorting experiment. This study reveals differences in object processing across modality and demonstrates an approach for analyzing such differences in multisensory visualizations.

[1]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS base system user's guide , 1990 .

[2]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation , 2001 .

[3]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Representation and recognition in vision , 1999 .

[4]  J. Chang,et al.  Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .

[5]  N. Sigala,et al.  Visual Categorization and Object Representation in Monkeys and Humans , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[7]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[8]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[9]  P. Schyns,et al.  Categorization creates functional features , 1997 .

[10]  M. Aminoff Principles of Neural Science. 4th edition , 2001 .

[11]  R. Klatzky,et al.  There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. , 1987 .

[12]  Theresa Cooke,et al.  Veridical Representation of Shape and Texture Changes in Novel 3D Objects , 2004 .

[13]  Soledad Ballesteros,et al.  Visual and Haptic Discrimination of Symmetry in Unfamiliar Displays Extended in the z-Axis , 2004, Perception.

[14]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence in Visual and Haptic Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.

[15]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Similarity of Tactual and Visual Picture Recognition with Limited Field of View , 1991, Perception.

[16]  James A. Hampton,et al.  Similarity and Categorization , 2001 .

[17]  Malcolm K. Brenner,et al.  General discussion 4 , 1994 .

[18]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Extracting object properties through haptic exploration. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[19]  S Lakatos,et al.  Haptic form perception: Relative salience of local and global features , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.