Online versus in-person interviews with adolescents: An exploration of data equivalence

This study compared data quantity and quality of interviews conducted with adolescents in a face-to-face setting versus online. Thirty participants in grades 10 through 12 participated in semi-structured interviews either through instant messaging or in-person. Results indicated that interviews conducted online produced fewer words and took longer to complete, and involved more rapport-building, however, there were no mean differences in the level of self-disclosure and the formality of the interviews, nor in the number and kind of themes that emerged or in the depth to which the themes were discussed. The findings suggest that despite taking longer and producing fewer words, data quality is unaffected by the mode of data collection (online versus face-to-face).

[1]  Joe E. Wheaton,et al.  Online Data Collection: Strategies for Research. , 2004 .

[2]  A. Stan,et al.  Mothers of Autistic Children. How do They Feel , 2012 .

[3]  D. Leeuw,et al.  Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys. , 1992 .

[4]  Stefan Stieger,et al.  Using Instant Messaging for Internet-Based Interviews , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[5]  Monica J Barratt,et al.  The efficacy of interviewing young drug users through online chat. , 2012, Drug and alcohol review.

[6]  Lyn Turney,et al.  Virtual Focus Groups: New Frontiers in Research , 2005 .

[7]  Ingrid K. Weigold,et al.  Examination of the equivalence of self-report survey-based paper-and-pencil and internet data collection methods. , 2013, Psychological methods.

[8]  Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos,et al.  Reliability and validity of self-reported burnout in college students: A cross randomized comparison of paper-and-pencil vs. online administration , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Qualitative Analysis of Content by , 2005 .

[10]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Online communication among adolescents: an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. , 2011, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[11]  Lois A. Ritter,et al.  Conducting Online Surveys , 2011 .

[12]  Eldad Davidov,et al.  Testing for measurement equivalence of human values across online and paper-and-pencil surveys , 2011 .

[13]  K. Krippendorff.  Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations , 2004 .

[14]  Jennifer Hunter,et al.  Is it time to abandon paper? The use of emails and the Internet for health services research--a cost-effectiveness and qualitative study. , 2012, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[15]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  The Sociocognitive Psychology of Computer-Mediated Communication: The Present and Future of Technology-Based Interactions , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[16]  C. Lee,et al.  Affordances and Text-Making Practices in Online Instant Messaging , 2007 .

[17]  G. Hunt,et al.  Stigma in Mental Health: Clients and Professionals , 2010, Issues in mental health nursing.

[18]  Sara Rigon,et al.  A web-based versus paper questionnaire on alcohol and tobacco in adolescents. , 2010, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[19]  Michele M. Dornisch,et al.  When is trust not enough? The role of perceived privacy of communication tools in comfort with self-disclosure , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Geert Loosveldt,et al.  Face-to-Face versus Web Surveying in a High-Internet-Coverage Population Differences in Response Quality , 2008 .

[21]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Interviewing over instant messaging , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[22]  P. Best,et al.  Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review , 2014 .

[23]  G. King,et al.  Contrasting Internet and Face-to-Face Focus Groups for Children with Chronic Health Conditions: Outcomes and Participant Experiences , 2010 .

[24]  J. Palmer,et al.  Use of a web-based questionnaire in the Black Women's Health Study. , 2010, American journal of epidemiology.

[25]  Rjg Raymond Opdenakker.  Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research , 2006 .

[26]  R. Shaw,et al.  Online Interviewing in Psychology: Reflections on the Process , 2011 .

[27]  Michelle M. Kazmer,et al.  QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWING IN INTERNET STUDIES: Playing with the media, playing with the method , 2008 .

[28]  A. Mewse,et al.  Evaluating Internet Interviews With Gay Men , 2009, Qualitative health research.

[29]  Penny Standen,et al.  The use of email‐facilitated interviewing with higher functioning autistic people participating in a grounded theory study , 2011 .

[30]  D. M. Mason,et al.  Adapting qualitative research strategies to technology savvy adolescents. , 2014, Nurse researcher.

[31]  Robin M. Mathy,et al.  Methodological Rigor with Internet Samples: New Ways to Reach Underrepresented Populations , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[32]  P. Hanna.  Using internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: a research note , 2012 .

[33]  S. Gosling,et al.  Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[34]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Is it Self-Administration if the Computer Gives You Encouraging Looks? , 2007 .

[35]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Annual research review: Harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: the nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. , 2014, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.