The accuracy of the Palpation Meter (PALM) for measuring pelvic crest height difference and leg length discrepancy.

STUDY DESIGN Test-retest reliability and validity. OBJECTIVE To determine the validity and reliability of the Palpation Meter (PALM). BACKGROUND Leg length discrepancy (LLD) has been associated with a variety of musculoskeletal disorders. Therefore, the clinical measurement of LLD has become a routine and important part of the physical examination. The PALM is an instrument that was recently developed to indirectly measure LLD, but little is known about its measurement properties. METHODS AND MEASURES Fifteen healthy and 15 symptomatic subjects with suspected LLD participated in this study. Measurements of pelvic crest height difference (PD) were obtained by 2 examiners using the PALM. A standing antero-posterior (AP) radiograph of each subject's pelvis was taken, and PD and LLD (femoral head height difference) were determined from the radiograph for comparison with the PALM values. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine the validity and reliability estimates of the PALM. RESULTS For all subjects, the validity estimates (ICC2,3) of the PALM for PD were excellent (0.90 for rater 1 and 0.92 for rater 2) when compared with the standing AP radiograph of the pelvis. The PALM was less accurate (ICC2,3 of 0.76 and 0.78 for rater 1 and 2, respectively) as an indirect estimate of LLD. Intrarater reliability for each rater was excellent (ICC3,3 = 0.97 and 0.98) and interrater reliability was very good (ICC2,3 = 0.88). CONCLUSION The PALM is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring PD. Clinicians should consider this convenient, cost-effective clinical tool as an alternative to radiographic measurement of pelvic crest height difference.

[1]  H. E. van der Aa,et al.  Is leg length discrepancy associated with the side of radiating pain in patients with a lumbar herniated disc? , 1999, Spine.

[2]  C. B. Burns,et al.  Reliability and validity of rigid lift and pelvic leveling device method in assessing functional leg length inequality. , 1998, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[3]  M T Gross,et al.  Intraexaminer reliability, interexaminer reliability, and mean values for nine lower extremity skeletal measures in healthy naval midshipmen. , 1997, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[4]  G. Plaugher,et al.  The reliability of patient positioning for evaluating static radiologic parameters of the human pelvis. , 1993, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[5]  T. Terjesen,et al.  Leg length inequality measured by ultrasound and clinical methods. , 1992, European journal of radiology.

[6]  K. Tallroth,et al.  Leg‐Length Inequality in People of Working Age: The Association Between Mild Inequality and Low‐Back Pain Is Questionable , 1991, Spine.

[7]  D. Riddle,et al.  Validity of derived measurements of leg-length differences obtained by use of a tape measure. , 1990, Physical therapy.

[8]  A. Delitto,et al.  Changes in innominate tilt after manipulation of the sacroiliac joint in patients with low back pain. An experimental study. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[9]  C. Houston,et al.  The Relationship between Leg Length Discrepancy and Lumbar Facet Orientation , 1988, Spine.

[10]  Aspegren Dd,et al.  Short leg correction: a clinical trial of radiographic vs. non-radiographic procedures. , 1987 .

[11]  U. Kujala,et al.  Lower limb asymmetry and patellofemoral joint incongruence in the etiology of knee exertion injuries in athletes. , 1987, International journal of sports medicine.

[12]  U. Kujala,et al.  Factors predisposing Army conscripts to knee exertion injuries incurred in a physical training program. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  S. Binder-Macleod,et al.  Leg length discrepancy assessment: accuracv and precision in five clinical methods of evaluation*. , 1984, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[14]  T. Noakes,et al.  The nature and response to therapy of 196 consecutive injuries seen at a runners' clinic. , 1984, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[15]  O. Friberg,et al.  Clinical Symptoms and Biomechanics of Lumbar Spine and Hip Joint in Leg Length Inequality , 1983, Spine.

[16]  K. Deboer,et al.  Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of leg-length differential measurement: a preliminary study. , 1983, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[17]  O. Friberg,et al.  Leg length asymmetry in stress fractures. A clinical and radiological study. , 1982, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[18]  J. Taylor,et al.  Low-Back Pain Associated With Leg Length Inequality , 1981, Spine.

[19]  S. Subotnick.  Limb length discrepancies of the lower extremity (the short leg syndrome). , 1981, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[20]  Greenman Pe.  Lift therapy: use and abuse. , 1979 .

[21]  M. .. Beal.  The short leg problem. , 1977, The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

[22]  G. R. Clarke,et al.  Unequal leg length: an accurate method of detection and some clinical results. , 1972, Rheumatology and physical medicine.

[23]  Klein Kk.  Asymmetries in the pelvis and legs and their implications in knee injury. , 1970 .

[24]  Rush Wa,et al.  A study of lower extremity length inequality. , 1946 .

[25]  M. Hagins,et al.  Intratester and Intertester Reliability of the Palpation Meter (PALM) in Measuring Pelvic Position , 1998 .

[26]  B. Swierstra,et al.  Measurement of limb length inequality. Comparison of clinical methods with orthoradiography in 190 children. , 1996, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[27]  A. Ross,et al.  LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY , 1995 .

[28]  S. Cook,et al.  A survey of running injuries in 1505 competitive and recreational runners. , 1990, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.