Characterizing evolution of extreme public transit behavior using smart card data

Existing studies have extensively used temporal-spatial data to mine the mobility patterns of different kinds of travelers. Smart Card Data (SCD) collected by the Automated Fare Collection (AFC) systems can reflect a general view of the mobility pattern of the whole bus and metro riders in urban area. Most existing work focusing on mobility pattern usually ignore a special group of people who travel in abnormal patterns or mechanisms. In this paper, we focus on the evolution extreme transit behaviors of travelers in urban area by using SCD in 2010 and 2014. We have several aspects of descriptive statistics of the SCD with a view to better understanding the dynamic process and evolution of the extreme transit behavior. By combining the SCD's temporal information with the amount of travel behavior, we also propose a concept of Extreme Index (EI) based on the mixture Gaussian model to depict the extreme level of the passengers' travel pattern. According to our analysis, the normal transit behavior of the two years have nearly the same temporal distribution. Although the EI models of the two years have similar distributions, the EI model of 2010 with two peaks is more scattered than that of 2014, which has only one peak. The EI model, which assigns an EI attribute for each SCD, can be applied in further analysis of urban transit or passengers' behavior.

[1]  Licia Capra,et al.  Individuals among commuters: Building personalised transport information services from fare collection systems , 2013, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[2]  Xingjian Liu,et al.  Early Birds, Night Owls, and Tireless/Recurring Itinerants: An Exploratory Analysis of Extreme Transit Behaviors in Beijing, China , 2015, ArXiv.

[3]  Marco Fiore,et al.  Generation and Analysis of a Large-Scale Urban Vehicular Mobility Dataset , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[4]  Yu-Ru Lin,et al.  Mesoscopic Structure and Social Aspects of Human Mobility , 2012, PloS one.

[5]  Christopher P. Monterola,et al.  Inferring Passenger Type from Commuter Eigentravel Matrices , 2015, ArXiv.

[6]  Jean-Claude Thill,et al.  Combining smart card data and household travel survey to analyze jobs-housing relationships in Beijing , 2013, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[7]  Licia Capra,et al.  Urban Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications , 2014, TIST.

[8]  E. Côme,et al.  Understanding Passenger Patterns in Public Transit Through Smart Card and Socioeconomic Data: A case study in Rennes, France , 2014 .

[9]  Xiaolei Ma,et al.  Mining smart card data for transit riders’ travel patterns , 2013 .

[10]  Zhenyu Chen,et al.  Predicting Passengers in Public Transportation Using Smart Card Data , 2015, ADC.

[11]  Susan Hanson,et al.  Perspectives on the geographic stability and mobility of people in cities , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Zhiyong Cui,et al.  Perspectives on Stability and Mobility of Passenger's Travel Behavior through Smart Card Data , 2015, ArXiv.