Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast: From Theory to Practice.

The development of ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced (UF-DCE) MRI has occurred in tandem with fast MRI scan techniques, particularly view-sharing and compressed sensing. Understanding the strengths of each technique and optimizing the relevant parameters are essential to their implementation. UF-DCE MRI has now shifted from research protocols to becoming a part of clinical scan protocols for breast cancer. UF-DCE MRI is expected to compensate for the low specificity of abbreviated MRI by adding kinetic information from the upslope of the time-intensity curve. Because kinetic information from UF-DCE MRI is obtained from the shape and timing of the initial upslope, various new kinetic parameters have been proposed. These parameters may be associated with receptor status or prognostic markers for breast cancer. In addition to the diagnosis of malignant lesions, more emphasis has been placed on predicting and evaluating treatment response because hyper-vascularity is linked to the aggressiveness of breast cancers. In clinical practice, it is important to note that breast lesion images obtained from UF-DCE MRI are slightly different from those obtained by conventional DCE MRI in terms of morphology. A major benefit of using UF-DCE MRI is avoidance of the marked or moderate background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) that can obscure the target enhancing lesions. BPE is less prominent in the earlier phases of UF-DCE MRI, which offers better lesion-to-noise contrast. The excellent contrast of early-enhancing vessels provides a key to understanding the detailed pathological structure of tumor-associated vessels. UF-DCE MRI is normally accompanied by a large volume of image data for which automated/artificial intelligence-based processing is expected to be useful. In this review, both the theoretical and practical aspects of UF-DCE MRI are summarized. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

[1]  N. Higano Editorial for "Assessment of Pulmonary Ventilation Using 3D Ventilation Flow-Weighted and Ventilation-Weighted Maps From 3D Ultrashort Echo-Time (UTE) MRI". , 2024, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Sina Marhabaie,et al.  The Minimum Admissible Detuning Efficiency of MRI Receive-Only Surface Coils. , 2024, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  Ling Lin,et al.  Editorial for "Value of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Vessel Wall MR Imaging in Assessing Vascular Invasion of Retroperitoneal Tumors". , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  M. Iima,et al.  Multiparametric Approach to Breast Cancer With Emphasis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Era of Personalized Breast Cancer Treatment , 2023, Investigative radiology.

[5]  M. Bissell,et al.  Editorial to "Fetal MRI-Based Body and Adiposity Quantification for Small for Gestational Age Perinatal Risk Stratification". , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  Qiqi Lu,et al.  MRI Deep Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation of Interventricular Septum for Black-Blood Myocardial T2* Measurement in Thalassemia. , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Xiaoxuan Jia,et al.  A Machine Learning-Based Unenhanced Radiomics Approach to Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Using T2-Weighted and Diffusion-Weighted MRI. , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  S. Ju,et al.  Value of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Vessel Wall MR Imaging in Assessing Vascular Invasion of Retroperitoneal Tumors. , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  M. Kirchin,et al.  Efficacy of Whole-Blood Model of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent Relaxivity in Predicting Vascular MR Signal Intensity In Vivo. , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Kyu Sung Choi Editorial for "Prediction of H3K27M Alteration Status in Brainstem Glioma Using Multi-Shell Diffusion MRI Metrics". , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Yaou Liu,et al.  Prediction of H3K27M Alteration Status in Brainstem Glioma Using Multi-Shell Diffusion MRI Metrics. , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  R. Regatte,et al.  Repeatability of Quantitative Knee Cartilage T1 , T2 , and T1ρ Mapping With 3D-MRI Fingerprinting. , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Man Li,et al.  Editorial for "Age and Gender-Dependence of Single- and Bi-Exponential T1ρ MR Parameters in Knee Ligaments". , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  T. Akashi,et al.  Deep Learning-Driven Transformation: A Novel Approach for Mitigating Batch Effects in Diffusion MRI Beyond Traditional Harmonization. , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  R. Regatte,et al.  Age and Gender-Dependence of Single-and Bi-Exponential T1ρ MR Parameters in Knee Ligaments. , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  Shan Huang,et al.  Right-Left Ventricular Interdependence in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot Patients With Right Ventricular Heart Failure. , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Xiaoxia Qu,et al.  Editorial for "Handling Missing MRI Data in Brain Tumors Classification Tasks: Usage of Synthetic Images vs. Duplicate Images and Empty Images". , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  M. Artzi,et al.  Handling Missing MRI Data in Brain Tumors Classification Tasks: Usage of Synthetic Images vs. Duplicate Images and Empty Images. , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  A. Pednekar,et al.  Accelerated Cine Cardiac MRI Using Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction: A Systematic Evaluation. , 2023, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  M. Iima,et al.  A multiparametric approach to predict triple-negative breast cancer including parameters derived from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI , 2023, European Radiology.

[21]  M. Iima,et al.  Comparison of Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MRI with Conventional DCE MRI in the Morphological Assessment of Malignant Breast Lesions , 2023, Diagnostics.

[22]  K. Rahmat,et al.  The effectiveness of an ultrafast breast MRI protocol in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. , 2023, Clinical radiology.

[23]  Jiuquan Zhang,et al.  Multiple parameters from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to discriminate between benign and malignant breast lesions: Comparison with apparent diffusion coefficient. , 2023, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[24]  Wenjun Yan,et al.  Combination of ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI-based radiomics and artificial neural network in assessing BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: Potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies , 2023, Frontiers in Oncology.

[25]  K. Maruyama,et al.  Time to enhancement of breast lesions and normal breast parenchyma in light of menopausal status and menstrual cycle for ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using compressed sensing. , 2022, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  A. Tardivon,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Ultrafast Breast MRI for Predicting Pathologic Response after Neoadjuvant Therapies. , 2022, Radiology.

[27]  M. Iima,et al.  Prediction of Ki-67 expression of breast cancer with a multi-parametric model using MRI parameters from ultrafast DCE-MRI and DWI , 2022, The International Workshop on Breast Imaging.

[28]  M. Iima,et al.  Visual Evaluation of Ultrafast MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Preliminary Study Association with Subtype , 2022, Tomography.

[29]  P. V. van Ooijen,et al.  Using deep learning to safely exclude lesions with only ultrafast breast MRI to shorten acquisition and reading time , 2022, European Radiology.

[30]  W. Moon,et al.  Added value of ultrafast sequence in abbreviated breast MRI surveillance in women with a personal history of breast cancer: A multireader study. , 2022, European journal of radiology.

[31]  M. Iima,et al.  Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Breast: How Is It Used? , 2022, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[32]  Ji Hee Kim,et al.  Ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI: association with pathologic complete response in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer , 2022, European Radiology.

[33]  P. V. van Ooijen,et al.  Breast Tumor Identification in Ultrafast MRI Using Temporal and Spatial Information , 2021, Cancers.

[34]  J. Salleron,et al.  Maximum slope using ultrafast breast DCE-MRI at 1.5 Tesla: a potential tool for predicting breast lesion aggressiveness , 2021, European Radiology.

[35]  H. Abe,et al.  Discriminating low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from non-low-grade DCIS or DCIS upgraded to invasive carcinoma: effective texture features on ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2021, Breast Cancer.

[36]  Kevin J. Cheung,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI features correlate with invasive breast cancer angiogenesis , 2021, NPJ breast cancer.

[37]  S. Mugikura,et al.  Value of ultrafast and standard dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the presence and extension of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer , 2021, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[38]  F. Gilbert,et al.  Introduction of an abbreviated breast MRI service in the UK as part of the BRAID trial: practicalities, challenges, and future directions. , 2021, Clinical radiology.

[39]  Fazael Ayatollahi,et al.  Automatic Breast Lesion Detection in Ultrafast DCE-MRI Using Deep Learning , 2021, Medical physics.

[40]  Ah Young Park,et al.  The usefulness of ultrafast MRI evaluation for predicting histologic upgrade of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2021, European journal of radiology.

[41]  S. Ha,et al.  A preliminary study of the combination of ultrafast and abbreviated dynamic contrast , 2020, Medicine.

[42]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  Maximum slope of ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: Comparisons with prognostic factors of breast cancer , 2020, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[43]  Tomoyuki Fujioka,et al.  Feasibility of ultrafast dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis: A case report , 2020, European journal of radiology open.

[44]  Eun Sook Ko,et al.  Ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI may generate prognostic imaging markers of breast cancer , 2020, Breast Cancer Research.

[45]  M. Iima,et al.  Background parenchymal enhancement and its effect on lesion detectability in ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. , 2020, European journal of radiology.

[46]  M. Iima,et al.  A multiparametric approach to diagnosing breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging and ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. , 2020, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[47]  W. Moon,et al.  Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: Lesion Conspicuity and Size Assessment according to Background Parenchymal Enhancement , 2020, Korean journal of radiology.

[48]  W. Moon,et al.  Time-to-enhancement at ultrafast breast DCE-MRI: potential imaging biomarker of tumour aggressiveness , 2020, European Radiology.

[49]  Julius Emons,et al.  Combination of an ultrafast TWIST-VIBE Dixon sequence protocol and diffusion-weighted imaging into an accurate easily applicable classification tool for masses in breast MRI , 2020, European Radiology.

[50]  Ah Young Park,et al.  The additional utility of ultrafast MRI on conventional DCE-MRI in evaluating preoperative MRI of breast cancer patients. , 2020, European journal of radiology.

[51]  Kaori Togashi,et al.  New parameters of ultrafast dynamic contrast‐enhanced breast MRI using compressed sensing , 2020, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[52]  M. Iima,et al.  Diagnostic performance of maximum slope: A kinetic parameter obtained from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast using k-space weighted image contrast (KWIC). , 2019, European journal of radiology.

[53]  Brittany Z Dashevsky,et al.  Differentiation between subcentimeter carcinomas and benign lesions using kinetic parameters derived from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI , 2019, European Radiology.

[54]  H. Abe,et al.  Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: Kinetic Curve Assessment Using Empirical Mathematical Model Validated with Histological Microvessel Density. , 2019, Academic radiology.

[55]  M. Kataoka,et al.  Impact of the Number of Iterations in Compressed Sensing Reconstruction on Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Breast MR Imaging , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[56]  Chengyue Wu,et al.  Quantitative analysis of vascular properties derived from ultrafast DCE‐MRI to discriminate malignant and benign breast tumors , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[57]  J. Kuijer,et al.  Summarizing the 4D image stack of ultrafast dynamic contrast enhancement MRI of breast cancer in 3D using color intensity projections , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[58]  E. Weiland,et al.  Diagnostic performance of initial enhancement analysis using ultra-fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast lesions , 2018, European Radiology.

[59]  Tsuyoshi Shiina,et al.  Vascular branching point counts using photoacoustic imaging in the superficial layer of the breast: A potential biomarker for breast cancer , 2018, Photoacoustics.

[60]  P. Agostinis,et al.  Defining the role of the tumor vasculature in antitumor immunity and immunotherapy , 2018, Cell Death & Disease.

[61]  Kaori Togashi,et al.  Ultrafast dynamic contrast‐enhanced mri of the breast using compressed sensing: breast cancer diagnosis based on separate visualization of breast arteries and veins , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[62]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Effect of Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MR Imaging Interpretive Performance in Community-based Practices. , 2017, Radiology.

[63]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Time to enhancement derived from ultrafast breast MRI as a novel parameter to discriminate benign from malignant breast lesions. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[64]  K. Togashi,et al.  Visualization of tumor-related blood vessels in human breast by photoacoustic imaging system with a hemispherical detector array , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[65]  Hiroyuki Abe,et al.  Ultrafast Bilateral DCE-MRI of the Breast with Conventional Fourier Sampling: Preliminary Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Analysis. , 2016, Academic radiology.

[66]  Ahwon Lee,et al.  Background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRIs of breast cancer patients: impact on tumor size estimation. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[67]  D Balvay,et al.  Perfusion and vascular permeability: basic concepts and measurement in DCE-CT and DCE-MRI. , 2013, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[68]  N. Hylton,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of pathologic response in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment for operable breast cancer , 2013, Cancer.

[69]  J. Ridgway,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance physics for clinicians: part II , 2010, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[70]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[71]  G. Newstead,et al.  Diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions using an empirical mathematical model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[72]  G Lutterbey,et al.  Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. , 1997, Radiology.

[73]  L J van Erning,et al.  MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. , 1994, Radiology.

[74]  C. Boetes,et al.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging , 2008, European Radiology.