Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks.

The structure of mutualistic networks is likely to result from the simultaneous influence of neutrality and the constraints imposed by complementarity in species phenotypes, phenologies, spatial distributions, phylogenetic relationships, and sampling artifacts. We develop a conceptual and methodological framework to evaluate the relative contributions of these potential determinants. Applying this approach to the analysis of a plant-pollinator network, we show that information on relative abundance and phenology suffices to predict several aggregate network properties (connectance, nestedness, interaction evenness, and interaction asymmetry). However, such information falls short of predicting the detailed network structure (the frequency of pairwise interactions), leaving a large amount of variation unexplained. Taken together, our results suggest that both relative species abundance and complementarity in spatiotemporal distribution contribute substantially to generate observed network patters, but that this information is by no means sufficient to predict the occurrence and frequency of pairwise interactions. Future studies could use our methodological framework to evaluate the generality of our findings in a representative sample of study systems with contrasting ecological conditions.

[1]  Luis Santamaría,et al.  Linkage Rules for Plant–Pollinator Networks: Trait Complementarity or Exploitation Barriers? , 2007, PLoS biology.

[2]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions , 2002 .

[3]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Asymmetric specialization and extinction risk in plant–flower visitor webs: a matter of morphology or abundance? , 2007, Oecologia.

[4]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. , 2008, Ecology.

[5]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants , 2005 .

[6]  A. Ives,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Trophic Associations , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Joseph Tzanopoulos,et al.  Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[8]  Wirt Atmar,et al.  The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat , 1993, Oecologia.

[9]  N. Waser,et al.  Size-specific interaction patterns and size matching in a plant-pollinator interaction web. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[10]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks , 2007, Nature.

[11]  Paulo R. Guimarães,et al.  On nestedness analyses: rethinking matrix temperature and anti‐nestedness , 2007 .

[12]  Jochen Fründ,et al.  What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits? , 2008, Ecology.

[13]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[14]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[15]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks , 2007 .

[16]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  Year‐to‐year variation in the topology of a plant–pollinator interaction network , 2008 .

[17]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  ASYMMETRIC SPECIALIZATION: A PERVASIVE FEATURE OF PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS , 2004 .

[18]  Luciano Cagnolo,et al.  Uniting pattern and process in plant-animal mutualistic networks: a review. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[19]  Miguel A. Rodríguez-Gironés,et al.  A new algorithm to calculate the nestedness temperature of presence–absence matrices , 2006 .

[20]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Jens M. Olesen,et al.  Structure of a plant–flower‐visitor network in the high‐altitude sub‐alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands , 2003 .

[22]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant /flower visitor web , 2006 .

[23]  N. Bartoloni,et al.  A year‐long plant‐pollinator network , 2006 .

[24]  D. Vázquez,et al.  The effect of space in plant–animal mutualistic networks: insights from a simulation study , 2008 .

[25]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  The pollination ecology of an assemblage of grassland asclepiads in South Africa. , 2003, Annals of botany.

[26]  Rebecca E. Irwin,et al.  Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Multispecies Plant-Animal Interactions , 2004 .

[27]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host–parasitoid food webs , 2007, Nature.

[28]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  NULL MODEL ANALYSES OF SPECIALIZATION IN PLANT–POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS , 2003 .