Benefits, mechanisms and challenges of international accreditation for teacher education: ASEAN academics’ perspectives

Purpose This study aims to explore some benefits and challenges of establishing an international accreditation for teacher education institutions (TEIs) by AsTEN Quality Assurance Agency. This specific accreditation agency is expected to improve the quality of teaching, learning and research at TEIs in ASEAN region. Design/methodology/approach The qualitative study generates data from questionnaires and online semi-structured interviews among ASEAN academics. They work as teacher educators in Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia. Findings As findings show, participating academics from Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Brunei Darussalam believe that it is necessary to have a specific international accreditation agency that can properly accommodate particular standards of teacher education. This accommodation is expected to increase the governance of quality teaching, learning and researching to prepare more competent and professional future teachers. Participating academics also acknowledge some potential challenges this specific accreditation agency may have, including local acceptance by national governments in ASEAN region and global acknowledgement from international accrediting agencies, mostly based in Global North countries. Research limitations/implications The study only involves academics in five ASEAN countries of Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines so that it may have less international acceptance. Practical/social implications The study also identifies aspects and mechanisms of blended online-onsite international accreditation application for TEIs, which grows its significance because of technological advancement, efficiency and prolonged COVID-19 pandemic. Originality/value The study provides a digital accreditation system for TEIs, particularly in ASEAN region. This originality is important in this era of Internet of Things.

[1]  D. Suherdi,et al.  Linguistic hegemony in global recognition: English-mediated internationalisation at Indonesian higher education institutions , 2021, Policy Futures in Education.

[2]  N. Nga,et al.  Role of Quality Assurance and Quality Accreditation in Higher Education in Some Developing Countries and Vietnam , 2019 .

[3]  Qiyun Wang,et al.  Investigating the implementation of accredited massive online open courses (MOOCs) in higher education: The boon and the bane , 2019, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.

[4]  Denise J. Luethge,et al.  Management and Business Education in Africa: A Post-Colonial Perspective of International Accreditation , 2019, Academy of Management Learning & Education.

[5]  Yazid Mati,et al.  Input resources indicators in use for accreditation purpose of higher education institutions , 2018, Performance Measurement and Metrics.

[6]  Renata Marciniak,et al.  Quality Assurance for Online Higher Education Programmes: Design and Validation of an Integrative Assessment Model Applicable to Spanish Universities , 2018 .

[7]  Huu Cuong Nguyen,et al.  Exploring impact of accreditation on higher education in developing countries: a Vietnamese view , 2018 .

[8]  Huu Cuong Nguyen,et al.  Accreditation of Viet Nam’s higher education: Achievements and challenges after a dozen years of development , 2017 .

[9]  Judy R. Wilkerson Navigating similarities and differences in national and international accreditation standards: A proposed approach using US agency requirements , 2017 .

[10]  Huu Cuong Nguyen Impact of International Accreditation on the Emerging Quality Assurance System: The Vietnamese Experience , 2017 .

[11]  Paolo Contu,et al.  The impact of an international online accreditation system on pedagogical models and strategies in higher education , 2015 .

[12]  Jane Knight,et al.  The International Race for Accreditation , 2015 .

[13]  Hui-Jung Chen,et al.  Is the Asian quality assurance system for higher education going glonacal? Assessing the impact of three types of program accreditation on Taiwanese universities , 2015 .

[14]  Óscar Espinoza,et al.  Accreditation in higher education in Chile: results and consequences , 2013 .

[15]  Denise Leite Brazilian higher education from a post‐colonial perspective , 2010 .

[16]  S. Marginson Higher Education in the Global Knowledge Economy , 2010 .

[17]  J. Eaton Accreditation and the Federal Future of Higher Education. , 2010 .

[18]  N. Umemiya Regional Quality Assurance Activity in Higher Education in Southeast Asia: Its Characteristics and Driving Forces , 2008 .

[19]  David E. Smith,et al.  Investigation of Higher Education: The Real Costs and Quality of Online Programs , 2008 .

[20]  P. Altbach,et al.  The Internationalization of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities , 2007 .

[21]  Tian Belawati,et al.  The Practice of a Quality Assurance System in Open and Distance Learning: A case study at Universitas Terbuka Indonesia (The Indonesia Open University) , 2007 .

[22]  Lee Harvey,et al.  Old Wine in New Bottles? A Comparison of Public and Private Accreditation Schemes in Higher Education , 2006 .

[23]  D. Damme Trends and Models in International Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Relation to Trade in Education. , 2002 .

[24]  H. Orlans Accreditation in American higher education: The issue of “diversity” , 1992 .