Estimating Project-Level Vehicle Emissions with Vissim and MOVES-Matrix

Estimating transportation network emissions requires multiplying estimates of on-road vehicle activity (by source type and operating mode) by applicable emission rates for the observed source type and operating conditions. Coupling microsimulation model runs with emissions modeling can make fast assessments possible in transportation air quality planning. This research developed a tool with automated linkage between the Vissim microsimulation model and the Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) model. To link the two models, the research team used MOVES-Matrix, which was prepared by iteratively running MOVES across all possible iterations of vehicle source type, fuel, environmental and operating conditions, and other parameters (hundreds of millions of model runs) to create a multidimensional emission rate lookup matrix. A Vissim simulation of the major arterial roads and freeways at I-85 and Jimmy Carter Boulevard in Gwinnett County, Georgia, provided the case study for this MOVES-matrix application. The researchers present predicted emissions and the results of a sensitivity analysis to identify the potential impacts of various internal Vissim modeling parameters (such as minimum headway, maximum deceleration rate for cooperative braking, and emergency stop distance) on a case study’s emissions outputs. The sensitivity analysis found that internal Vissim parameters impacted emissions and that proper care should be taken in using Vissim for emissions analysis at the corridor and link level. The case study demonstrates that Vissim coupled with MOVES-Matrix can be an effective tool for emissions analysis.

[1]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Assessment of alternative fuel and powertrain transit bus options using real-world operations data: Life-cycle fuel and emissions modeling , 2015 .

[2]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Developing Vehicle Classification Inputs for Project-Level MOVES Analysis , 2015 .

[3]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Smoothing Methods to Minimize Impact of Global Positioning System Random Error on Travel Distance, Speed, and Acceleration Profile Estimates , 2006 .

[4]  Jessica Granell Model year distribution and vehicle technology composition of the onroad fleet as a function of vehicle registration data and site location characteristics , 2002 .

[5]  Randall Guensler,et al.  Comparison of Fuel-Cycle Emissions per Passenger Mile from Multiple Bus and Rail Technologies , 2013 .

[6]  David Michael Miller Developing a procedure to identify parameters for calibration of a vissim model , 2009 .

[7]  Shauna L. Hallmark,et al.  Characterizing on-road variables that affect passenger vehicle modal operation , 2002 .

[8]  Peter Vortisch,et al.  Microscopic Traffic Flow Simulator VISSIM , 2010 .

[9]  Dwayne Anthony Henclewood Real-time estimation of arterial performance measures using a data-driven microscopic traffic simulation technique , 2012 .

[10]  W. Bachman,et al.  Assessing Impacts of Improved Signal Timing as a Transportation Control Measure Using an Activity-Specific Modeling Approach , 2000 .

[11]  R. Guensler,et al.  A Monte Carlo Technique for Assessing Motor Vehicle Emission Model Uncertainty , 1995 .

[12]  Karen Sentoff,et al.  Calibrating a Traffic Microsimulation Model to Real-World Operating Mode Distributions , 2014 .

[13]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[14]  H. Frey,et al.  Application of AIMSUN Microsimulation Model to Estimate Emissions on Signalized Arterial Corridors , 2014 .

[15]  James M. Anderson A methodology for separation of multiple distributions in arterial travel time data , 2015 .

[16]  Sara Khoeini Modeling framework for socioeconomic analysis of managed lanes , 2014 .