Effect of different handgrip angles on work distribution during hand cycling at submaximal power levels

The effect of different handle angles on work distribution during hand cycling was determined. Able-bodied subjects performed hand cycling at 20% of maximum power level (mean (SD) power level: 90.0 (25.8) W) at a cadence of 70 rpm using handle angles of ±30°, ±15° and 0°. The handle angle had a significant effect on work during the pull down (p < 0.001) and lift up (p = 0.005) sector, whereby the highest work was performed with handle angles of +30° and −15° respectively. The cycle sector had a significant effect on work (p < 0.001) and significantly (p = 0.002) higher work was performed in the pull down sector (25% higher than mean work over one cycle) as compared to the lift up sector (30% lower than mean work over one cycle). Therefore, a fixed handle angle of +30° is suggested to be optimal for power generation. The results of this study help to optimise the handbike–user interface. A more pronated handle angle compared to the one conventionally used was found to improve the performance of hand cycling and thereby the mobility of disabled people.

[1]  P. Kruger,et al.  Effect of two different handgrip positions on elbow peak torque values , 2007 .

[2]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  A J Dallmeijer,et al.  Submaximal physical strain and peak performance in handcycling versus handrim wheelchair propulsion , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[4]  G. Heise,et al.  The effect of handgrip position on upper extremity neuromuscular responses to arm cranking exercise. , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[5]  G. Gass,et al.  The maximum physiological responses during incremental wheelchair and arm cranking exercise in male paraplegics. , 1984, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  M. O'Brien,et al.  Isokinetic strength of the elbow flexors with the forearm in supination and in the neutral position , 2001 .

[7]  Maria T. E. Hopman,et al.  Physiological responses to asynchronous and synchronous arm-cranking exercise , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[8]  Daniel Theisen,et al.  Influence of crank rate in hand cycling. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  Gass Gc,et al.  The maximum physiological responses during incremental wheelchair and arm cranking exercise in male paraplegics. , 1984 .

[10]  R H Rozendal,et al.  Wheelchair ergonomics and physiological testing of prototypes. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[11]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[12]  L. Dupont,et al.  Spontaneously chosen crank rate variations in submaximal arm exercise with inexperienced subjects. Effects on cardiorespiratory and efficiency parameters. , 2002, International journal of sports medicine.

[13]  Thomas W J Janssen,et al.  Manual wheelchairs: Research and innovation in rehabilitation, sports, daily life and health. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  Smith Gb,et al.  Arm crank vs handrim wheelchair propulsion: metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses. , 1983 .

[15]  A J Dallmeijer,et al.  Alternative Modes of Manual Wheelchair Ambulation: An Overview , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[16]  W. Herzog,et al.  Moment-length relations of rectus femoris muscles of speed skaters/cyclists and runners. , 1991, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  J S Petrofsky,et al.  Arm crank vs handrim wheelchair propulsion: metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  G Mukherjee,et al.  Physiological response to the ambulatory performance of hand-rim and arm-crank propulsion systems. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[19]  Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey,et al.  The influence of crank length and cadence on mechanical efficiency in hand cycling , 2007, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[20]  Christian Krämer,et al.  Optimization of the Handbike’s Drive Concept — Experimental Approach , 2006 .

[21]  F Hintzy,et al.  Muscular efficiency during arm cranking and wheelchair exercise: a comparison. , 2002, International journal of sports medicine.