SELECTION OF LONGITUDINAL DESIRED DYNAMICS FOR DYNAMIC INVERSION CONTROLLED RE-ENTRY VEHICLES

Dynamic Inversion is a design technique used to synthesize flight controllers whereby the set of existing dynamics are cancelled out and replaced by a designer selected set of desired dynamics. The output of such an inner loop controller is the control input required to achieve the desired response. The desired dynamics essentially form a loop-shaping compensator that affects the closed-loop response of the entire system. This paper attempts to quantify the particular form of desired dynamics which produce the best closed-loop performance and robustness in a Dynamic Inversion flight controller. Four candidate forms of desired dynamics which invert the short period dynamics are evaluated. These four include a proportional, proportional integral, flying qualities, and a ride qualities form of desired dynamics. Longitudinal controllers are synthesized for the prototype X-38 Crew Return Vehicle using a linear model at a selected point in the flight envelope. Pole placement is used to synthesize a robust outer loop around the dynamic inversion inner loop in order to provide closed-loop stability. The resulting closedloop performance is evaluated in the time domain, and in terms of frequency dependent singular values, quadratic cost and a passenger ride comfort index. Of the desired dynamics presented here, results indicate that the ride quality compensation dynamics provide the best overall system performance in terms of both time domain and frequency domain responses.

[1]  S. A. Snell Preliminary assessment of the robustness of dynamic inversion based flight control laws , 1992 .

[2]  Richard J. Adams,et al.  Robust flight control design using dynamic inversion and structured singular value synthesis , 1993, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[3]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Aircraft Control and Simulation , 1992 .

[4]  S. A. Snell,et al.  Robust control of angle of attack using dynamic inversion combined with quantitative feedback theory , 1996 .

[5]  N. C. Duncan,et al.  Demographic and psychological variables affecting test subject evaluations of ride quality , 1975 .

[6]  Richard Colgren,et al.  DYNAMIC INVERSION APPLIED TO THE F-117A , 1997 .

[7]  Gary J. Balas,et al.  Robust Dynamic Inversion for Control of Highly Maneuverable Aircraft , 1995 .

[8]  Aaron J. Ostroff,et al.  Force and Moment Approach for Achievable Dynamics Using Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion , 1999 .

[9]  Daigoro Ito,et al.  AIAA 2001-4380 Robust Dynamic Inversion Controller Design and Analysis for the X-38 , 2001 .

[10]  Richard Adams Robust, nonlinear, high angle-of-attack control design for a supermaneuverable vehicle , 1993 .

[11]  Dale Enns,et al.  AN APPROACH TO SELECT DESIRED DYNAMICS GAINS FOR DYNAMIC INVERSION CONTROL LAWS , 1997 .

[12]  Dan Bugajski,et al.  Dynamic inversion: an evolving methodology for flight control design , 1994 .

[13]  David R. Downing,et al.  Analysis of a Candidate Control Algorithm for a Ride-Quality Augmentation System , 1989 .

[14]  Michael Graesslin,et al.  Impact of mission constraints on optimal flight trajectories for the lifting body X-38 , 1999 .

[15]  G. Stein,et al.  Multivariable feedback design: Concepts for a classical/modern synthesis , 1981 .

[16]  Gary J. Balas,et al.  Robust dynamic inversion control laws for aircraft control , 1992 .

[17]  Wayne C. Durham Dynamic inversion and model-following control , 1996 .

[18]  Kevin A. Wise,et al.  Stability and flying qualities robustness of a dynamic inversion aircraft control law , 1996 .