Practice variability and transfer of training: the role of self-efficacy generality.

Practice variability has been shown to enhance transfer of training. The purpose of the present study was to examine the role of self-efficacy generality as a motivational mechanism in explaining the relationship between practice variability and transfer. Undergraduate students (N = 82) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 training conditions (constant or variable) for a computer decision-making task. Measures of self-efficacy (intensity and generality) and transfer (near and far) were assessed. The results provided support for some of the hypothesized relationships. Specifically, practice variability led to increased self-efficacy generality. Both self-efficacy intensity and generality influenced far transfer performance, although only self-efficacy generality served as a mediator between practice variability and far transfer.

[1]  E. Thorndike,et al.  The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. (I). , 1901 .

[2]  R. Schmidt A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[3]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Behavior modification in applied settings , 1975 .

[4]  R. Kerr,et al.  Specific and Varied Practice of Motor Skill , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[6]  James M. Royer Theories of the transfer of learning , 1979 .

[7]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  Research settings in industrial and organizational psychology: Are findings in the field more generalizable than in the laboratory? , 1979 .

[8]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[9]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[10]  T. D. Lee,et al.  Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Marilyn E. Gist The Effects of Self-Efficacy Training on Training Task Performance. , 1986 .

[13]  A. Bandura,et al.  Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation , 1986, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

[14]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  TRANSFER OF TRAINING: A REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1988 .

[15]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF TRAINING METHOD ON SELF‐EFFICACY AND IDEA GENERATION AMONG MANAGERS , 1989 .

[16]  D. Schunk Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective , 1991 .

[17]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory of self-regulation☆ , 1991 .

[18]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[19]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[20]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Training for Performance - Principles of Applied Human Learning - Morrison,Je , 1993 .

[21]  D. Eden,et al.  Self-efficacy training to speed reemployment: Helping people to help themselves. , 1993 .

[22]  D. Hofmann The Influence of Goal Orientation on Task Performance: A Substantively Meaningful Suppressor Variable1 , 1993 .

[23]  S. Woodruff,et al.  Task, Domain, and General Efficacy: A Reexamination of the Self-Efficacy Scale , 1993 .

[24]  B. Plake,et al.  Validation of a Measure of Learning and Performance Goal Orientations , 1994 .

[25]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  M. Quiñones,et al.  THE VALIDITY OF ISOMETRIC STRENGTH TESTS , 1994 .

[27]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Predicting self-efficacy and performance during skill acquisition , 1994 .

[28]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performances: The need for specificity of assessment. , 1995 .

[29]  R. Magill,et al.  Variability of Practice and Contextual Interference in Motor Skill Learning. , 1995, Journal of motor behavior.

[30]  Domain specificity and the logic of using general ability as an independent variable or covariate , 1995 .

[31]  M. Quiñones Pretraining context effects: Training assignment as feedback. , 1995 .

[32]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  Practice Effects on Skill Acquisition, Learning Outcome, Retention, and Sensitivity to Relearning , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[33]  Mimi Bong,et al.  Generality of academic self-efficacy judgments: Evidence of hierarchical relations. , 1997 .

[34]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Evaluating training during training: Obstacles and opportunities. , 1997 .

[35]  Addie Ehrenstein,et al.  Training for a rapidly changing workplace : applications of psychological research , 1997 .

[36]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Series in Applied Psychology. , 1997 .

[37]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  EFFECTS OF SELF‐EFFICACY and GOAL‐ORIENTATION TRAINING ON NEGOTIATION SKILL MAINTENANCE: WHAT ARE THE MECHANISMS? , 1997 .

[38]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[40]  S. Gully,et al.  Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal--setting process. , 1997 .

[41]  L. Dosier,et al.  Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings , 1997 .

[42]  Eleanor M. Smith,et al.  Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer , 1998 .

[43]  Sandra L. Fisher,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF LEARNER EFFORT AND GOAL ORIENTATION ON TWO LEARNING OUTCOMES , 1998 .

[44]  T. Maurer,et al.  A comparison of Likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy. , 1998 .

[45]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Research in the Psychological Laboratory , 1999 .

[46]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Efficacy-Performance Spirals: An Empirical Test , 2000 .

[47]  S. Pinkerton,et al.  Magnitude: An Important Dimension of Self‐Efficacy1 , 2000 .

[48]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. , 2000 .

[49]  D. Steele-Johnson,et al.  Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation, affect, and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[50]  Irwin L. Goldstein,et al.  Training in Organizations , 2001 .

[51]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Effects of Training Goals and Goal Orientation Traits on Multidimensional Training Outcomes and Performance Adaptability. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[52]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  Effects of trainer expressiveness, organization, and trainee goal orientation on training outcomes. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[53]  S. Payne,et al.  The impact of error training and individual differences on training outcomes: an attribute-treatment interaction perspective. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Goal orientation and ability: interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  K. Wehrmann,et al.  Transfer of Training , 2002, Journal of health & social policy.