A modified ROC analysis for the selection of cut-off values and the definition of intermediate results of serodiagnostic tests.

A total number of 50 sera from clinically confirmed cases of canine Borrelia (B.) burgdorferi infection and 44 negative control sera were tested with a B. burgdorferi specific antibody ELISA. The data were submitted to the 'two-graph receiver operating characteristic' (TG-ROC) analysis which is a plot of the test sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) against the threshold (cut-off) value assuming the latter to be an independent variable. Thus, in contrast to the conventional ROC analysis, valid pairs of Se and Sp can be read for pre-assigned threshold values directly from the TG-ROC plots. A cut-off that realises equal test parameters (Se = Sp = theta 0 (theta-zero)) can be obtained as the intersection point of the two graphs. Since the value for theta 0 is below a preselected accuracy level (95% or 90%), two cut-off values are selected that represent the bounds of an 'intermediate range' (IR). IR can be considered as a 'borderline' range for the clinical interpretation of test results. The proportion of the measurement range (MR) that gives unambiguous test results can be expressed using IR as the 'valid range proportion' (VRP = (MR-IR)/MR). VRP and theta 0 are useful parameters for test comparison since they do not depend upon the selection of a single cut-off point. In addition, the selection of cut-off values is supported by graphical displays of efficiency, Youden's index and likelihood ratios which can be considered as functions of the pre-assigned cut-off value. TG-ROC was derived as a user-defined template for a commercially available spreadsheet programme (MS-EXCEL, Microsoft).

[1]  R. Gasser,et al.  Determination of the optimum cut-off value of a diagnostic test , 1990 .

[2]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[3]  P. J. Green,et al.  Probability and Statistical Inference , 1978 .

[4]  I. Gardner,et al.  TESTVIEW: a spreadsheet program for evaluation and interpretation of diagnostic tests , 1993 .

[5]  J BERKSON,et al.  Cost-utility as a measure of the efficiency of a test. , 1947, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[6]  C. Franti,et al.  Notes about determining the cut-off value in enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) , 1993 .

[7]  M Greiner,et al.  Two-graph receiver operating characteristic (TG-ROC): a Microsoft-EXCEL template for the selection of cut-off values in diagnostic tests. , 1995, Journal of immunological methods.

[8]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[9]  G Görög,et al.  An Excel program for calculating and plotting receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves, histograms and descriptive statistics. , 1994, Computers in biology and medicine.

[10]  E. DeLong,et al.  Intermediate, Indeterminate, and Uninterpretable Diagnostic Test Results , 1987, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[11]  D. Warnock,et al.  Computer-assisted rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the serological diagnosis of aspergillosis. , 1983, Journal of immunological methods.

[12]  A Chiecchio,et al.  DECIDE: a software for computer-assisted evaluation of diagnostic test performance. , 1993, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[13]  E J Sondik,et al.  Clinical evaluation of test strategies. A decision analysis of parameter estimation. , 1982, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[14]  W. Youden,et al.  Index for rating diagnostic tests , 1950, Cancer.

[15]  J J Gart,et al.  Comparison of a screening test and a reference test in epidemiologic studies. I. Indices of agreement and their relation to prevalence. , 1966, American journal of epidemiology.