The comparison of proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models in analyzing the first birth interval survival data

Survival analysis is a branch of statistics, which is focussed on the analysis of time- to-event data. In multivariate survival analysis, the proportional hazards (PH) is the most popular model in order to analyze the effects of several covariates on the survival time. However, the assumption of constant hazards in PH model is not always satisfied by the data. The violation of the PH assumption leads to the misinterpretation of the estimation results and decreasing the power of the related statistical tests. On the other hand, the accelerated failure time (AFT) models do not assume the constant hazards in the survival data as in PH model. The AFT models, moreover, can be used as the alternative to PH model if the constant hazards assumption is violated. The objective of this research was to compare the performance of PH model and the AFT models in analyzing the significant factors affecting the first birth interval (FBI) data in Indonesia. In this work, the discussion was limited to three AFT models which were based on Weibull, exponential, and log-normal distribution. The analysis by using graphical approach and a statistical test showed that the non-proportional hazards exist in the FBI data set. Based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC), the log-normal AFT model was the most appropriate model among the other considered models. Results of the best fitted model (log-normal AFT model) showed that the covariates such as women's educational level, husband's educational level, contraceptive knowledge, access to mass media, wealth index, and employment status were among factors affecting the FBI in Indonesia.

[1]  Elisa Lee,et al.  Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis: Lee/Survival Data Analysis , 2003 .

[2]  N. Roustaei,et al.  Comparison of Cox’s Regression Model and Parametric Models in Evaluating the Prognostic Factors for Survival after Liver Transplantation in Shiraz during 2000–2012 , 2015, International journal of organ transplantation medicine.

[3]  Elisa T. Lee,et al.  Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[4]  Mostafa HOSSEINI,et al.  A Comparison between Accelerated Failure-time and Cox Proportional Hazard Models in Analyzing the Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients , 2015, Iranian journal of public health.

[5]  David A. Schoenfeld,et al.  Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model , 1982 .

[6]  D. G. Altman,et al.  Review of survival analyses published in cancer journals. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  Richard Kay,et al.  On the Use of the Accelerated Failure Time Model As An Alternative to the Proportional Hazards Model in the Treatment of Time to Event Data: A Case Study in Influenza , 2002 .

[8]  Rashedul Hoque,et al.  Fitting Time to First Birth Using Extended Cox Regression Model in Presence of Nonproportional Hazard , 2015 .

[9]  Vicente Núñez-Antón,et al.  Comparing proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models for survival analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  Subrat K. Acharya,et al.  Accelerated Failure Time Models: An Application in the Survival of Acute Liver Failure Patients in India , 2014 .

[11]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[12]  M. Schemper Cox Analysis of Survival Data with Non‐Proportional Hazard Functions , 1992 .

[13]  Lee-Jen Wei,et al.  The accelerated failure time model: a useful alternative to the Cox regression model in survival analysis. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Christopher H Jackson,et al.  flexsurv: A Platform for Parametric Survival Modeling in R. , 2016, Journal of statistical software.