Adding independent risks in an insurance portfolio: which shape for the insurers’ preferences?

Many papers in the litterature have adopted the expected utility paradigm to analyze insurance decisions. Insurance companies manage policies by growing, by adding independent risks. Even if adding risks generally ultimately decreases the probability of insolvency, the impact on the insurer's expected utility is less clear. Indeed, it is not true that the risk aversion toward the additional loss generated by a new policy included in an insurance portfolio is a decreasing function of the number of contracts already underwritten (i.e. the "fallacy of large numbers"). In this paper, it is shown that most commonly used utility functions do not necessarily positively value the aggregation of independent risks so that they are not eligible for insurers. This casts some doubt about the conclusions drawn in the papers postulating such completely monotonic utilities for guiding insurers' choices. Finally, it is shown that the sufficient conditions for adding risks that can be found in the litterature need to be refined by restricting the domain of definition of the insurer's utility function.

[1]  Jean-François Mertens,et al.  Intergenerational Equity and the Discount Rate for Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2006 .

[2]  Yves Smeers,et al.  Equilibrium models for the carbon leakage problem , 2008 .

[3]  Douglas W. Diamond.  Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring , 1984 .

[4]  J. Gabszewicz.  La différenciation des produits , 2006 .

[5]  Michael L. Smith,et al.  The Law of Large Numbers and the Strength of Insurance , 1994 .

[6]  Daniel Bienstock,et al.  Potential Function Methods for Approximately Solving Linear Programming Problems: Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[7]  V. Rotar.  Actuarial Models: The Mathematics of Insurance , 2006 .

[8]  S. Pekarski.  Budget deficits and inflation feedback , 2011 .

[9]  Stephen A. Ross,et al.  Adding Risks: Samuelson's Fallacy of Large Numbers Revisited , 1999, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[10]  Hylke Vandenbussche,et al.  Are Your Firm's Taxes Set in Warsaw? Spatial Tax Competition in Europe , 2008 .

[11]  Mario Menegatti,et al.  On the Conditions for Precautionary Saving , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[12]  Jean Hindriks.  Au-delà de Copernic : de la confusion au consensus ? , 2008 .

[13]  On the Misuse of the Central Limit Theorem in Some Risk Calculations , 1983 .

[14]  G. Oggioni,et al.  Average power contracts can mitigate carbon leakage , 2008 .

[15]  Tapen Sinha.  Economic and Financial Decisions under Risk , 2006 .

[16]  Jean-François Mertens,et al.  Regularity and stability of equilibria in an overlapping generations model with exogenous growth , 2009 .

[17]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  Economic Geography: The Integration of Regions and Nations , 2008 .

[18]  Natali Hritonenko,et al.  Discrete-continuous analysis of optimal equipment replacement , 2010, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[19]  Çagatay Kayi,et al.  Characterizations of Pareto-efficient, fair, and strategy-proof allocation rules in queueing problems , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[20]  Knut K. Aase,et al.  Economics of Insurance , 1989 .

[21]  W. Pohlmeier,et al.  High frequency financial econometrics : recent developments , 2007 .

[22]  M. Maggi,et al.  On the relationship between absolute prudence and absolute risk aversion , 2006 .

[23]  James Renegar,et al.  A mathematical view of interior-point methods in convex optimization , 2001, MPS-SIAM series on optimization.

[24]  P. Samuelson.  Risk and uncertainty: a fallacy of large numbers , 1963 .

[25]  Jacek B. Krawczyk,et al.  A viability theory approach to a two-stage optimal control problem of technology adoption , 2007 .

[26]  J. Dávila,et al.  The taxation of capital returns in overlapping generations economies without Financial assets , 2008 .

[27]  Hylke Vandenbussche,et al.  Financial Constraints in China: Firm-Level Evidence , 2009 .

[28]  Jan Dhaene,et al.  Modern Actuarial Risk Theory: Using R , 2008 .

[29]  P. Picard,et al.  Firms' location under taste and demand heterogeneity , 2008 .

[30]  Ola Hammarlid.  When to accept a sequence of gambles , 2005 .

[31]  Laurence A. Wolsey,et al.  Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, 4th International Conference, CPAIOR 2007, Brussels, Belgium, May 23-26, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, CPAIOR.

[32]  Peter Richtárik,et al.  Approximate level method , 2008 .

[33]  R. Amir.  Supermodularity and Complementarity in Economics: An Elementary Survey , 2003 .

[34]  Yurii Nesterov,et al.  Generalized Power Method for Sparse Principal Component Analysis , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[35]  Carlo Rosa,et al.  Forecasting the Direction of Policy Rate Changes: The Importance of ECB Words , 2009 .

[36]  Nicolas Gillis,et al.  Nonnegative Factorization and The Maximum Edge Biclique Problem , 2008, 0810.4225.

[37]  Miles S. Kimball,et al.  Standard Risk Aversion , 1991 .

[38]  Pierre Devolder,et al.  Management of a pension fund under mortality and financial risks , 2007 .

[39]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  The impact of the unilateral EU commitment on the stability of international climate agreements , 2010 .

[40]  Nicolas Gillis,et al.  Using underapproximations for sparse nonnegative matrix factorization , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[41]  Richard J. Zeckhauser,et al.  Proper risk aversion , 1987 .

[42]  Hans U. Gerber A.S.A.,et al.  Utility Functions: From Risk Theory to Finance , 1998 .

[43]  Louis Eeckhoudt,et al.  Which Shape for the Cost Curve of Risk , 2001 .