Two Blind Mice: It Is Time for Greater Collaboration between Engineers and Social Scientists around the RDD & D of Industrial Technologies

Within this short communication article, we consider the value that closer and earlier collaboration between engineers and social scientists could offer the research, development, demonstration and deployment (RDD & D) of industrial technologies. We consider perspectives taken from both the social sciences and engineering in order to highlight the prejudices and misunderstandings that currently limit the extent and quality of such collaboration. It is reasoned that the complex engineering challenges of the future demand a move towards greater interdisciplinarity. Current successful approaches towards fostering interdisciplinarity within the Carbon Dioxide Utilisation (CDU) research community are then used to illustrate the benefits of employing a more holistic approach to the design and introduction of new industrial technologies. It is our hope that this article will catalyse similar collaborative research efforts within other sectors.

[1]  Thomas Llewelyn Webb,et al.  Using Public Transport Can Make Up for Flying Abroad on Holiday , 2015 .

[2]  A. Azapagic,et al.  Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: A critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts , 2015 .

[3]  D. Horst.  NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[4]  Katy Armstrong,et al.  Assessing the Potential of Utilization and Storage Strategies for Post-Combustion CO2 Emissions Reduction , 2015, Front. Energy Res..

[5]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review , 2009 .

[6]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment Handbook: A Guide for Environmentally Sustainable Products , 2012 .

[7]  T. Cichon.  The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 Research and Innovation Action Deliverable D4.4 Switching between Direct Control and Prediction Mode , 2018 .

[8]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[9]  D. Bell,et al.  Re-visiting the ‘social gap’: public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy , 2013 .

[10]  Christopher R. Jones,et al.  Understanding and Assessing Public Perceptions of Carbon Dioxide Utilisation (CDU) Technologies , 2015 .

[11]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the PostNormal Age , 2001 .

[12]  Lv Shilei,et al.  Target-oriented obstacle analysis by PESTEL modeling of energy efficiency retrofit for existing residential buildings in China's northern heating region , 2009 .

[13]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[14]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  From research to action: now we have to move on CCS communication , 2010 .

[15]  C K Patel,et al.  Industrial ecology. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  John C. Parker.  Power and people , 1937, Electrical Engineering.

[17]  S. Argentati,et al.  Horizon 2020: the EU framework programme for research and innovation , 2015 .

[18]  C. R. Jones,et al.  Investigating public perceptions of carbon dioxide utilisation (CDU) technology: a mixed methods study. , 2015, Faraday discussions.

[19]  J. Creighton.  The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions Through Citizen Involvement , 2005 .

[20]  André Faaij,et al.  Informed and uninformed public opinions on CO2 capture and storage technologies in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[21]  J. Richard Eiser,et al.  Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study , 2009 .

[22]  Derek K. Hitchins.  Advanced Systems Thinking, Engineering, and Management , 2003 .

[23]  Christopher R. Jones,et al.  Understanding 'local' opposition to wind development in the UK: How big is a backyard? , 2010 .

[24]  Elsje Alessandra Quadrelli,et al.  Carbon dioxide utilisation : closing the carbon cycle , 2015 .

[25]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation , 2007 .

[26]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action , 2009 .

[27]  Linda Steg,et al.  Energy saving and energy efficiency concepts for policy making , 2009 .

[28]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Undesired reinforcement of harmful ‘self-evident truths’ concerning the implementation of wind power , 2012 .

[29]  Thomas C. Beierle.  Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions , 2010 .