Characterizing the role of the pre‐SMA in the control of speed/accuracy trade‐off with directed functional connectivity mapping and multiple solution reduction

Several plausible theories of the neural implementation of speed/accuracy trade‐off (SAT), the phenomenon in which individuals may alternately emphasize speed or accuracy during the performance of cognitive tasks, have been proposed, and multiple lines of evidence point to the involvement of the pre‐supplemental motor area (pre‐SMA). However, as the nature and directionality of the pre‐SMA's functional connections to other regions involved in cognitive control and task processing are not known, its precise role in the top‐down control of SAT remains unclear. Although recent advances in cross‐sectional path modeling provide a promising way of characterizing these connections, such models are limited by their tendency to produce multiple equivalent solutions. In a sample of healthy adults (N = 18), the current study uses the novel approach of Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation for Multiple Solutions (GIMME‐MS) to assess directed functional connections between the pre‐SMA, other regions previously linked to control of SAT, and regions putatively involved in evidence accumulation for the decision task. Results reveal a primary role of the pre‐SMA for modulating activity in regions involved in the decision process but suggest that this region receives top‐down input from the DLPFC. Findings also demonstrate the utility of GIMME‐MS and solution‐reduction methods for obtaining valid directional inferences from connectivity path models.

[1]  A. Oliviero,et al.  Static magnetic field stimulation of the supplementary motor area modulates resting-state activity and motor behavior , 2019, Communications Biology.

[2]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  M. Marsman,et al.  What can we learn from Plausible Values? , 2016, Psychometrika.

[4]  Anders Ledberg,et al.  Neurobiological Models of Two-Choice Decision Making Can Be Reduced to a One-Dimensional Nonlinear Diffusion Equation , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[6]  A. Heathcote,et al.  DMC: Dynamic Models of Choice , 2016 .

[7]  R. Ivry,et al.  Focal striatum lesions impair cautiousness in humans , 2016, Cortex.

[8]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  Analytic posteriors for Pearson's correlation coefficient , 2015, Statistica Neerlandica.

[9]  Kathleen M. Gates,et al.  The first day is always the hardest: Functional connectivity during cue exposure and the ability to resist smoking in the initial hours of a quit attempt , 2017, NeuroImage.

[10]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[11]  Robert Turner,et al.  The subthalamic nucleus during decision‐making with multiple alternatives , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Hauke R Heekeren,et al.  Changes in Neural Connectivity Underlie Decision Threshold Modulation for Reward Maximization , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  John C. Rothwell,et al.  Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and the Pre-SMA Alter Drift Rate and Response Thresholds Respectively During Perceptual Decision-Making , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[14]  Helmut Ltkepohl,et al.  New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis , 2007 .

[15]  E. Charles Leek,et al.  Domain General Sequence Operations Contribute to Pre-SMA Involvement in Visuo-spatial Processing , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  Brandon M. Turner,et al.  A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions. , 2013, Psychological methods.

[17]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Guorong Wu,et al.  A blind deconvolution approach to recover effective connectivity brain networks from resting state fMRI data , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Kathleen M. Gates,et al.  Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data , 2011, NeuroImage.

[21]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Testing theories of post-error slowing , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[22]  H. Engeland,et al.  Basic Impairments in Regulating the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff Predict Symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2010, Biological Psychiatry.

[23]  Michael J. Martinez,et al.  Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM‐152 brain template , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[24]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  A posteriori model validation for the temporal order of directed functional connectivity maps , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[25]  Kathleen M. Gates,et al.  Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples , 2012, NeuroImage.

[26]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Brandon M. Turner,et al.  A flexible and efficient hierarchical Bayesian approach to the exploration of individual differences in cognitive-model-based neuroscience. , 2018 .

[28]  Joseph Ramsey,et al.  Bayesian networks for fMRI: A primer , 2014, NeuroImage.

[29]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff , 2012, Neuron.

[30]  Olivier Rioul,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff , 2018, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[31]  P. Molenaar,et al.  Dealing with Multiple Solutions in Structural Vector Autoregressive Models , 2016, Multivariate behavioral research.

[32]  Birte U. Forstmann,et al.  Model-based cognitive neuroscience: a conceptual introduction , 2015 .

[33]  A. Sack,et al.  The modulatory role of pre-SMA in speed-accuracy tradeoff: A bi-directional TMS study , 2018, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Kathleen M. Gates,et al.  Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: An alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM , 2010, NeuroImage.

[36]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A Diffusion Model Analysis of the Effects of Aging on Recognition Memory Journal of Memory and Language , 2003 .

[37]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Dynamic models of choice , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[38]  Carlo Semenza,et al.  TMS of supplementary motor area (SMA) facilitates mental rotation performance: Evidence for sequence processing in SMA , 2017, NeuroImage.

[39]  Morten Wang Fagerland,et al.  The McNemar test for binary matched-pairs data: mid-p and asymptotic are better than exact conditional , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[40]  Briana N Sprague,et al.  Bridging the Nomothetic and Idiographic Approaches to the Analysis of Clinical Data , 2016, Assessment.

[41]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Neural Correlates of Trial-to-Trial Fluctuations in Response Caution , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  D. Sörbom Model modification , 1989 .

[43]  Gunnar Blohm,et al.  On the neural implementation of the speed-accuracy trade-off , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[44]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Differential Contributions of the Left and Right Inferior Parietal Lobules to Number Processing , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Brain Areas Consistently Linked to Individual Differences in Perceptual Decision-making in Younger as well as Older Adults before and after Training , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  F. Balcı,et al.  Disrupted latent decision processes in medication-free pediatric OCD patients. , 2017, Journal of affective disorders.

[47]  A. Osman,et al.  On the locus of speed-accuracy trade-off in reaction time: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  The Neural and Computational Basis of Controlled Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff during Task Performance , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  John D Medaglia,et al.  Examining working memory task acquisition in a disrupted neural network. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  C. Semenza,et al.  Supplementary motor area as key structure for domain-general sequence processing: A unified account , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[51]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The overconstraint of response time models: Rethinking the scaling problem , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  R. Bogacz,et al.  The neural basis of the speed–accuracy tradeoff , 2010, Trends in Neurosciences.

[53]  David Sheskin The McNemar Test , 2003 .

[54]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[56]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Network modelling methods for FMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[57]  Sharna Jamadar,et al.  Adjustments of Response Threshold during Task Switching: A Model-Based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  Anna S. Engels,et al.  Changes in alcohol-related brain networks across the first year of college: a prospective pilot study using fMRI effective connectivity mapping. , 2013, Addictive behaviors.

[59]  Sumio Watanabe,et al.  Asymptotic Equivalence of Bayes Cross Validation and Widely Applicable Information Criterion in Singular Learning Theory , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[60]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  POSTERIOR PREDICTIVE ASSESSMENT OF MODEL FITNESS VIA REALIZED DISCREPANCIES , 1996 .

[61]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  A common right fronto‐parietal network for numerosity and duration processing: An fMRI study , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[62]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Similarity Effect and Optimal Control of Multiple-Choice Decision Making , 2008, Neuron.

[63]  D. Wegener,et al.  The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[64]  Gunnar Blohm,et al.  Neural dynamics implement a flexible decision bound with a fixed firing rate for choice: a model-based hypothesis , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[65]  Max C. Keuken,et al.  The Subcortical Cocktail Problem; Mixed Signals from the Subthalamic Nucleus and Substantia Nigra , 2015, PloS one.

[66]  N. G. Best,et al.  The deviance information criterion: 12 years on , 2014 .

[67]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  The Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in the Elderly Brain: A Structural Model-Based Approach , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[68]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  fMRI and EEG Predictors of Dynamic Decision Parameters during Human Reinforcement Learning , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[69]  Stephanie T. Lane,et al.  Uncovering General, Shared, and Unique Temporal Patterns in Ambulatory Assessment Data , 2019, Psychological methods.

[70]  Kathleen M Gates,et al.  Network Mapping with GIMME , 2017, Multivariate behavioral research.

[71]  Udo Boehm,et al.  On the importance of avoiding shortcuts in applying cognitive models to hierarchical data , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[72]  R. Marois,et al.  fMRI Evidence for a Dual Process Account of the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Decision-Making , 2008, PloS one.

[73]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Understanding decision-making deficits in neurological conditions: insights from models of natural action selection , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[74]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Domain General Mechanisms of Perceptual Decision Making in Human Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[75]  S. Dehaene,et al.  A Magnitude Code Common to Numerosities and Number Symbols in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[76]  Alexander Weigard,et al.  A diffusion modeling approach to understanding contextual cueing effects in children with ADHD. , 2014, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[77]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[78]  Fuat Balci,et al.  Inhibition of Pre–Supplementary Motor Area by Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Leads to More Cautious Decision-making and More Efficient Sensory Evidence Integration , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.