Behavior of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (T. obesus) tuna in a network of fish aggregating devices (FADs)

The influence of multiple anchored fish aggregating devices (FADs) on the spatial behavior of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye tuna (T. obesus) was investigated by equipping all thirteen FADs surrounding the island of Oahu (HI, USA) with automated sonic receivers (“listening stations”) and intra-peritoneally implanting individually coded acoustic transmitters in 45 yellowfin and 12 bigeye tuna. Thus, the FAD network became a multi-element passive observatory of the residence and movement characteristics of tuna within the array. Yellowfin tuna were detected within the FAD array for up to 150 days, while bigeye tuna were only observed up to a maximum of 10 days after tagging. Only eight yellowfin tuna (out of 45) and one bigeye tuna (out of 12) visited FADs other than their FAD of release. Those nine fish tended to visit nearest neighboring FADs and, in general, spent more time at their FAD of release than at the others. Fish visiting the same FAD several times or visiting other FADs tended to stay longer in the FAD network. A majority of tagged fish exhibited some synchronicity when departing the FADs but not all tagged fish departed a FAD at the same time: small groups of tagged fish left together while others remained. We hypothesize that tuna (at an individual or collective level) consider local conditions around any given FAD to be representative of the environment on a larger scale (e.g., the entire island) and when those conditions become unfavorable the tuna move to a completely different area. Thus, while the anchored FADs surrounding the island of Oahu might concentrate fish and make them more vulnerable to fishing, at a meso-scale they might not entrain fish longer than if there were no (or very few) FADs in the area. At the existing FAD density, the ‘island effect’ is more likely to be responsible for the general presence of fish around the island than the FADs. We recommend further investigation of this hypothesis.

[1]  J. Battin.  When Good Animals Love Bad Habitats: Ecological Traps and the Conservation of Animal Populations , 2004 .

[2]  I. Ohta,et al.  Periodic behavior and residence time of yellowfin and bigeye tuna associated with fish aggregating devices around Okinawa Islands, as identified with automated listening stations , 2005 .

[3]  A. Fonteneau.  Sea mounts and tuna in the Tropical Eastern Atlantic , 1991 .

[4]  A. Fonteneau.  Monts sous-marins et thons dans l'Atlantique tropical est , 1991 .

[5]  A. Klimley,et al.  School fidelity and homing synchronicity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares , 1999 .

[6]  Jean-Yves Le Gall,et al.  Pêche thonière et dispositifs de concentration de poissons , 1999 .

[7]  K. Holland,et al.  Movement and vulnerability of bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in relation to FADs and natural aggregation points , 2000 .

[8]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  FAD: Fish Aggregating Device or Fish Attracting Device? A new analysis of yellowfin tuna movements around floating objects , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  Frédéric Ménard,et al.  Drifting FADs used in tuna fisheries: an ecological trap? , 2000 .

[10]  L. Dagorn,et al.  Association of yellowfi n tuna (Thunnus albacares) with tracking vessels during ultrasonic telemetry experiments , 2001 .

[11]  F. Marsac,et al.  Telemetry applied to behaviour analysis of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares, Bonnaterre, 1788) movements in a network of fish aggregating devices , 1998, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  Daniel W. Fuller,et al.  Movements, behavior, and habitat selection of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the eastern equatorial Pacific, ascertained through archival tags , 2002 .

[13]  Tim Dempster,et al.  Fish aggregation device (FAD) research: gaps in current knowledge and future directions for ecological studies , 2004, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[14]  L. Dagorn,et al.  Individual differences in horizontal movements of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in nearshore areas in French Polynesia, determined using ultrasonic telemetry , 2000 .

[15]  Christopher G. Lowe,et al.  Movement Patterns, Habitat Utilization, Home Range Size and Site Fidelity of Whitesaddle Goatfish, Parupeneus Porphyreus, In a Marine Reserve , 2000, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[16]  Alain Fonteneau,et al.  A worldwide review of purse seine fisheries on FADs , 2000 .

[17]  P. Cayré,et al.  Behaviour of yellowfin ( Thunnus albacares ) and skipjack tuna ( Katsuwonus pelamis ) around FADs as determined by sonic tagging , 1991 .

[18]  Barbara A. Block,et al.  Horizontal movements and depth distribution of large adult yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) near the Hawaiian Islands, recorded using ultrasonic telemetry: implications for the physiological ecology of pelagic fishes , 1999 .

[19]  Kn Holland,et al.  The Fish Aggregating Device (FAD) system of Hawaii , 2000 .

[20]  J. Castro,et al.  A general theory on fish aggregation to floating objects: An alternative to the meeting point hypothesis , 2002, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[21]  M. Petit,et al.  Improving our Understanding of Tropical Tuna Movements from Small to Large Scales , 2001 .

[22]  M. Doty,et al.  The Island Mass Effect , 1956 .

[23]  K. Holland,et al.  HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL MOVEMENTS OF YELLOWFIN AND BIGEYE TUNA ASSOCIATED WITH FISH AGGREGATING DEVICES , 1990 .

[24]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  Tropical tuna associated with floating objects: a simulation study of the meeting point hypothesis , 1999 .

[25]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  Review of fish associative behaviour: Toward a generalisation of the meeting point hypothesis , 2000, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.