Correction of pelvic adduction during total hip arthroplasty reduces variability in radiographic inclination: findings of a randomised controlled trial

Introduction: The study aims were to identify the incidence of pelvic adduction during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in lateral decubitus and to determine, when aiming for 35° of apparent operative inclination (AOI), which of 3 operating table positions most accurately obtained a target radiographic inclination (RI) of 42°: (1) horizontal; (2) 7° head-down; (3) patient-specific position based on correction of pelvic adduction. Methods: With patients seated on a levelled theatre table, a ruler incorporating a spirit level was used to draw transverse pelvic lines (TPLs) on the skin overlying the pelvis and sacrum. Subsequently, when positioned in lateral decubitus these lines provided a measure of pelvic adduction. 270 participants were recruited, with 90 randomised to each group for operating table position. In all cases target AOI was 35°, aiming to achieve a target RI of 42°. The primary outcome measure was absolute (unsigned) deviation from the target RI of 42°. Results: 266/270 patients demonstrated pelvic adduction (overall mean 4.4°, range 0– 9.2°). No patients demonstrated pelvic abduction. There were significant differences in RI between each of the 3 groups. The horizontal table group displayed the highest mean RI. The patient specific table position group achieved the smallest absolute deviation from target RI of 42°. Discussion: In lateral decubitus, unrecognised pelvic adduction is common and is an important contributor to unexpectedly high RI. The use of preoperative TPLs helps identify pelvic adduction and its subsequent correction reduces variability in RI. Clinical Trial Protocol number: NCT01831401.

[1]  D. Beverland,et al.  Reducing variability in apparent operative inclination during total hip arthroplasty: findings of a randomised controlled trial , 2018, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[2]  Gwo-Chin Lee,et al.  Polyethylene Liner Dissociation Is a Complication of the DePuy Pinnacle Cup: A Report of 23 Cases , 2016, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  D. Beverland,et al.  Placement of the acetabular component. , 2016, The bone & joint journal.

[4]  C. Ames,et al.  Acetabular Anteversion Changes Due to Spinal Deformity Correction: Bridging the Gap Between Hip and Spine Surgeons. , 2015, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  B. Domb,et al.  Accuracy of Component Positioning in 1980 Total Hip Arthroplasties: A Comparative Analysis by Surgical Technique and Mode of Guidance. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  D. Beverland ACETABULAR CUP PLACEMENT: THE ELUSIVE HOME RUN OF THA , 2015 .

[7]  J. Schoones,et al.  Which implant should we use for primary total hip replacement? A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  V. Kumar,et al.  Total hip replacement through a posterior approach using a 22 mm diameter femoral head : the role of the transverse acetabular ligament and capsular repair in reducing the rate of dislocation. , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[9]  H. Gill,et al.  Pelvic position and movement during hip replacement. , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[10]  G. Meermans,et al.  The use of the transverse acetabular ligament for determining the orientation of the components in total hip replacement: a randomised controlled trial. , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[11]  R. Barrack,et al.  Accuracy of acetabular component position in hip arthroplasty. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  J. Baré,et al.  The incidence of noise generation arising from the large-diameter Delta Motion ceramic total hip bearing. , 2013, The bone & joint journal.

[13]  H. Mikami,et al.  Anteversion of the acetabular component aligned with the transverse acetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  D. Beverland,et al.  Photographic measurement of the inclination of the acetabular component in total hip replacement using the posterior approach. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  J. Shelton,et al.  Influence of cup orientation on the wear performance of metal-on-metal hip replacements , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[16]  D. Beverland,et al.  The transverse acetabular ligament: an aid to orientation of the acetabular component during primary total hip replacement: a preliminary study of 1000 cases investigating postoperative stability. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  Masatoshi Naito,et al.  Pelvic motion during total hip arthroplasty with translateral and posterolateral approaches , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[18]  B. Jolles,et al.  Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  R Bauer,et al.  EBRA: a method to measure migration of acetabular components. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  D. Murray The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.