Characterization of unexpected postural changes during robot-assisted gait training in paraplegic patients

Study design:This is a retrospective study.Objectives:The objectives of this study were to categorize unexpected postural changes (UPCs) during gait training in paraplegic patients with wearable gait-assist robots, to reveal the incidence of the UPC and its time-dependent changes during initial gait training period and to investigate neurological level-specific differences.Setting:This study was conducted in Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan.Methods:We investigated five patients (46.2±14.6 years; lesion level: T6:3, T12:2). All patients had previously achieved gait with wearable robot and walker at supervision level. The UPCs were counted for 2 years and classified according to their type. The time-course data were calculated from the incidence of UPCs for 10 days from initial gait training with the walker. The neurological level-specific differences were investigated between T6 and T12 injuries.Results:Eighty-five UPCs were observed and classified into three categories: anterior breakdown, posterior breakdown (PBD) and mal-timing. The average rate over the entire period was 0.96±0.62 (incidents/h/subject). PBD, which was defined as hyperflexion of both hip joints, occurred with the highest frequency (0.64±0.64 incidents/h/subject). During initial gait training, there was a gradual decrease in the occurrence of UPC. For neurological level-specific differences, UPCs were observed more frequently in T6 injuries (1.36±0.35 incidents/h/subject) compared with T12 injuries (0.36±0.31 incidents/h/subject).Conclusion:PBDs might be the result of near collisions between the trunk of the user and the walker, which make it difficult for the users to move their trunk over an anterior stance limb. Training that is focused upon well-timed forward movements of the walker might be required to avoid the occurrence of this common UPC.

[1]  R K Jones,et al.  The physiological cost index of walking with mechanical and powered gait orthosis in patients with spinal cord injury , 2012, Spinal Cord.

[2]  C. Bard,et al.  Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Attentional requirements of walking in spinal cord injured patients compared to normal subjects , 1999, Spinal Cord.

[4]  Graham H. Creasey,et al.  International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association. , 1997 .

[5]  W. Donovan,et al.  The International Standards Booklet for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury , 1994, Paraplegia.

[6]  N Chino,et al.  Clinical experience with a new hip-knee-ankle-foot orthotic system using a medial single hip joint for paraplegic standing and walking. , 1996, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[7]  R. Waters,et al.  International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[8]  P. London Injury , 1969, Definitions.

[9]  Shigeo Tanabe,et al.  Design of the Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor (WPAL) for paraplegic gait reconstruction , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[10]  M E Young,et al.  Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  L. Harvey,et al.  A comparison of patients' and physiotherapists' expectations about walking post spinal cord injury: a longitudinal cohort study , 2012, Spinal Cord.

[12]  R. Rosenfeld Patients , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[13]  J. Woo,et al.  Falls among Chinese stroke patients during rehabilitation. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robotics for Gait Training After Spinal Cord Injury , 2005 .

[15]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  The ReWalk Powered Exoskeleton to Restore Ambulatory Function to Individuals with Thoracic-Level Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[16]  M. Limburg,et al.  Risk factors for falls of hospitalized stroke patients. , 1997, Stroke.

[17]  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski,et al.  Dose Estimation and Surveillance of Mechanical Loading Interventions for Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[18]  L. Nyberg,et al.  Patient falls in stroke rehabilitation. A challenge to rehabilitation strategies. , 1995, Stroke.

[19]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk™ exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people with complete spinal cord injury: A pilot study , 2012, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[20]  M. Molinari,et al.  Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): criterion validation , 2005, Spinal Cord.

[21]  J Stallard,et al.  The dynamics of walking using the hip guidance orthosis (hgo) with crutches , 1981, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[22]  Shigeo Tanabe,et al.  Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor (WPAL) for supporting upright walking in persons with paraplegia. , 2013, NeuroRehabilitation.

[23]  T. Lu,et al.  Postural responses during falling with rapid reach-and-grasp balance reaction in patients with motor complete paraplegia , 2008, Spinal Cord.

[24]  E. Garshick,et al.  Spinal Cord Injury-Induced Osteoporosis: Pathogenesis and Emerging Therapies , 2012, Current Osteoporosis Reports.

[25]  Clare E. Milner,et al.  Real-Time Kinematic, Temporospatial, and Kinetic Biofeedback During Gait Retraining in Patients: A Systematic Review , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[26]  Roger Weber,et al.  Tools for understanding and optimizing robotic gait training. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[27]  M. Dijkers,et al.  Correlates of life satisfaction among persons with spinal cord injury. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Manabu Nankaku,et al.  Evaluation of hip fracture risk in relation to fall direction , 2005, Osteoporosis International.