Impact of experience-dependent and -independent factors on gene expression in songbird brain

Songbirds provide rich natural models for studying the relationships between brain anatomy, behavior, environmental signals, and gene expression. Under the Songbird Neurogenomics Initiative, investigators from 11 laboratories collected brain samples from six species of songbird under a range of experimental conditions, and 488 of these samples were analyzed systematically for gene expression by microarray. ANOVA was used to test 32 planned contrasts in the data, revealing the relative impact of different factors. The brain region from which tissue was taken had the greatest influence on gene expression profile, affecting the majority of signals measured by 18,848 cDNA spots on the microarray. Social and environmental manipulations had a highly variable impact, interpreted here as a manifestation of paradoxical “constitutive plasticity” (fewer inducible genes) during periods of enhanced behavioral responsiveness. Several specific genes were identified that may be important in the evolution of linkages between environmental signals and behavior. The data were also analyzed using weighted gene coexpression network analysis, followed by gene ontology analysis. This revealed modules of coexpressed genes that are also enriched for specific functional annotations, such as “ribosome” (expressed more highly in juvenile brain) and “dopamine metabolic process” (expressed more highly in striatal song control nucleus area X). These results underscore the complexity of influences on neural gene expression and provide a resource for studying how these influences are integrated during natural experience.

[1]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  A Monoclonal Antibody Specific to a Song System Nuclear Antigen in Estrildine Finches , 2001, Neuron.

[2]  J. Davis.  Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor , 2007 .

[3]  E. Jarvis,et al.  Learned Birdsong and the Neurobiology of Human Language , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  Steve Horvath,et al.  WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  Matthew A. Zapala,et al.  Adult mouse brain gene expression patterns bear an embryologic imprint. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  B. Frey,et al.  The functional landscape of mouse gene expression , 2004, Journal of biology.

[8]  S. Horvath,et al.  Functional organization of the transcriptome in human brain , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  A. Arnold,et al.  Sex bias and dosage compensation in the zebra finch versus chicken genomes: general and specialized patterns among birds. , 2010, Genome research.

[10]  B. Williams,et al.  Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq , 2008, Nature Methods.

[11]  S. Batalov,et al.  A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  J. Wingfield,et al.  Seasonal Differences of Gene Expression Profiles in Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia) Hypothalamus in Relation to Territorial Aggression , 2009, PloS one.

[13]  G. Robinson,et al.  Genes and Social Behavior , 2008, Science.

[14]  E. Jarvis,et al.  Differential expression of glutamate receptors in avian neural pathways for learned vocalization , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  M. Rashotte,et al.  Influence of food and water availability on undirected singing and energetic status in adult male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[16]  S. Horvath,et al.  A General Framework for Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis , 2005, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[17]  R. Tempelman,et al.  Sexual differentiation of the zebra finch song system: potential roles for sex chromosome genes , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[18]  Eliot A. Brenowitz,et al.  Comparative approaches to the avian song system. , 1997, Journal of neurobiology.

[19]  M. Dresselhaus,et al.  A Specialized Forebrain Circuit for Vocal Babbling in the Juvenile Songbird , 2008 .

[20]  Molly E Cummings,et al.  Sexual and social stimuli elicit rapid and contrasting genomic responses , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  A. Arnold,et al.  Dosage compensation is less effective in birds than in mammals , 2007, Journal of biology.

[22]  Lei Liu,et al.  The Songbird Neurogenomics (SoNG) Initiative: Community-based tools and strategies for study of brain gene function and evolution , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[23]  P. Marler.  Birdsong and speech development: could there be parallels? , 1970, American scientist.

[24]  C. V. Jongeneel,et al.  An atlas of human gene expression from massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS). , 2005, Genome research.

[25]  S. Horvath,et al.  Conservation and evolution of gene coexpression networks in human and chimpanzee brains , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  D Margoliash,et al.  An introduction to birdsong and the avian song system. , 1997, Journal of neurobiology.

[27]  Eliot A. Brenowitz,et al.  Song learning in birds: diversity and plasticity, opportunities and challenges , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Central control of song in the canary, Serinus canarius , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  Gordon K. Smyth,et al.  limma: Linear Models for Microarray Data , 2005 .

[30]  Sarah E. London,et al.  Integrating Genomes, Brain and Behavior in the Study of Songbirds , 2009, Current Biology.

[31]  Claudio V. Mello,et al.  Birdsong “Transcriptomics”: Neurochemical Specializations of the Oscine Song System , 2008, PloS one.

[32]  Albert J. Vilella,et al.  The genome of a songbird , 2010, Nature.

[33]  Sarah E. London,et al.  Developmental shifts in gene expression in the auditory forebrain during the sensitive period for song learning , 2009, Developmental neurobiology.

[34]  F. Wright,et al.  Large-Scale Gene Expression Differences Across Brain Regions and Inbred Strains Correlate With a Behavioral Phenotype , 2006, Genetics.

[35]  B. Southey,et al.  Discrete molecular states in the brain accompany changing responses to a vocal signal , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  M. Rashotte,et al.  Food availability but not cold ambient temperature affects undirected singing in adult male zebra finches , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[37]  S. Bottjer,et al.  Parallel pathways for vocal learning in basal ganglia of songbirds , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Allan R. Jones,et al.  Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain , 2007, Nature.

[39]  D. Vicario,et al.  Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  J. Belsky,et al.  Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes? , 2009, Molecular Psychiatry.

[41]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[42]  K. Lesch,et al.  Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism, differential early rearing, and behavior in rhesus monkey neonates , 2002, Molecular Psychiatry.

[43]  T. Hahn.  Integration of photoperiodic and food cues to time changes in reproductive physiology by an opportunistic breeder, the red crossbill, Loxia curvirostra (Aves: Carduelinae) , 1995 .

[44]  Gene E. Robinson,et al.  Genomic dissection of behavioral maturation in the honey bee , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  E. Jarvis,et al.  Rapid Behavioral and Genomic Responses to Social Opportunity , 2005, PLoS biology.

[46]  J. Crabbe,et al.  Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. , 1999, Science.