Making Audience Engagement Visible: Publics for Journalism on Social Media Platforms

The role of audiences in creating meaning from journalistic content is already well-established: viewers, readers, and users of the news create their own dominant or alternative readings of news stories, and in doing so engage in the interpretation for further circulation of news content for themselves as well as for those in their social networks with whom they choose to share such readings. To date, however, such phenomena have largely been studied only on a small-scale basis; the full extent of such active news engagement, and its likely impact on the circulation of the news, has remained a matter of extrapolation. However, using innovative methods that draw on large-scale data gathering from social media platforms – which now play a central role in the popular discussion and circulation of news content – it is becoming possible to observe the processes of active news reading and sharing as they take place, and without interfering with these processes themselves. This provides new insights into the diverse patterns of user engagement with the news, and documents how in aggregate such engagement gives rise to temporary audiences around current themes and topics. This article draws on large-scale, longitudinal data for audience engagement on Twitter and Facebook with the 35 leading Australian news and opinion sites, gathered as part of the Australian Twitter News Index (ATNIX) project since mid-2012. Based on this empirical study it explores the prevalence of dominant and alternative approaches to reading news stories, and examines the structure and dynamics of the news audience.

[1]  Alex Burns,et al.  Oblique strategies for ambient journalism , 2010 .

[2]  A. Bruns,et al.  The Arab Spring and Social Media Audiences , 2013 .

[3]  Lee Wilkins Deciding What's News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time , 2005 .

[4]  Axel Bruns,et al.  Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production , 2005 .

[5]  Stephen Coleman,et al.  A Tale of Two Houses: The House of Commons, the Big Brother House and the People at Home , 2003 .

[6]  John Fiske,et al.  Audiencing: A cultural studies approach to watching television , 1992 .

[7]  H. Gans Deciding What's News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time , 1979 .

[8]  Stephan Schlögl,et al.  24 hours of an #outcry: The networked publics of a socio-political debate , 2014 .

[9]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[10]  Axel Bruns,et al.  Easy data, hard data: The politics and pragmatics of Twitter research after the computational turn , 2015 .

[11]  Axel Bruns,et al.  From news blogs to news on Twitter: gatewatching and collaborative news curation , 2015 .

[12]  Axel Bruns,et al.  Sharing the News: Dissemination of Links to Australian News Sites on Twitter , 2013 .

[13]  A. Hermida From TV to Twitter: How Ambient News Became Ambient Journalism , 2010 .

[14]  Eli Pariser The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think , 2012 .

[15]  J. Habermas Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research , 2006 .

[16]  Pablo J. Boczkowski,et al.  The Relevance of Algorithms , 2013 .