Molecular modeling of averaged rigor crossbridges from tomograms of insect flight muscle.

Electron tomography, correspondence analysis, molecular model building, and real-space refinement provide detailed 3-D structures for in situ myosin crossbridges in the nucleotide-free state (rigor), thought to represent the end of the power stroke. Unaveraged tomograms from a 25-nm longitudinal section of insect flight muscle preserved native structural variation. Recurring crossbridge motifs that repeat every 38.7 nm along the actin filament were extracted from the tomogram and classified by correspondence analysis into 25 class averages, which improved the signal to noise ratio. Models based on the atomic structures of actin and of myosin subfragment 1 were rebuilt to fit 11 class averages. A real-space refinement procedure was applied to quantitatively fit the reconstructions and to minimize steric clashes between domains introduced during the fitting. These combined procedures show that no single myosin head structure can fit all the in situ crossbridges. The validity of the approach is supported by agreement of these atomic models with fluorescent probe data from vertebrate muscle as well as with data from regulatory light chain crosslinking between heads of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin when bound to actin.

[1]  D A Winkelmann,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1: a molecular motor. , 1993, Science.

[2]  Kenneth A. Taylor,et al.  Electron Tomography of Insect Flight Muscle in Rigor and AMPPNP at 23°C , 1996 .

[3]  R. Paul,et al.  Smooth muscle contractility is modulated by myosin tail-S2-LMM hinge region interaction. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  J. Frank,et al.  Correspondence analysis of aligned images of biological particles. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  J. Frank,et al.  Use of multivariate statistics in analysing the images of biological macromolecules. , 1981, Ultramicroscopy.

[6]  A. Houdusse,et al.  Structure of the regulatory domain of scallop myosin at 2 A resolution: implications for regulation. , 1996, Structure.

[7]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[8]  A Pascual-Montano,et al.  Quantitative self-organizing maps for clustering electron tomograms. , 2002, Journal of structural biology.

[9]  Michael S. Chapman,et al.  Restrained real-space macromolecular atomic refinement using a new resolution-dependent electron-density function , 1995 .

[10]  Roger Cooke,et al.  Orientation and rotational mobility of spin-labelled myosin heads in insect flight muscle in rigor , 1983, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[11]  H. Sweeney,et al.  Spare the rod, spoil the regulation: necessity for a myosin rod. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Peter J. Knight,et al.  Fraction of myosin heads bound to thin filaments in rigor fibrils from insect flight and vertebrate muscles , 1981, Nature.

[13]  Niels Volkmann,et al.  Evidence for cleft closure in actomyosin upon ADP release , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[14]  Kenneth A. Taylor,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of rigor insect flight muscle from tilted thin sections , 1984, Nature.

[15]  M. Reedy,et al.  Rigor crossbridge structure in tilted single filament layers and flared-X formations from insect flight muscle. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  M. Ikebe,et al.  Characterization of the motor and enzymatic properties of smooth muscle long S1 and short HMM: role of the two-headed structure on the activity and regulation of the myosin motor. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[17]  Brian W. Matthews,et al.  An efficient general-purpose least-squares refinement program for macromolecular structures , 1987 .

[18]  M. S. Chapman,et al.  Real space refinement of acto-myosin structures from sectioned muscle. , 2001, Journal of structural biology.

[19]  J. Stull,et al.  Phosphorylation-dependent Structural Changes in the Regulatory Light Chain Domain of Smooth Muscle Heavy Meromyosin* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Atomic model of the actin filament , 1990, Nature.

[21]  M. Irving,et al.  Dynamic measurement of myosin light-chain-domain tilt and twist in muscle contraction , 1999, Nature.

[22]  R A Milligan,et al.  Structure of the actin-myosin complex and its implications for muscle contraction. , 1993, Science.

[23]  K A Taylor,et al.  Crossbridges in the complete unit cell of rigor insect flight muscle imaged by three-dimensional reconstruction from oblique sections. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  K A Taylor,et al.  Three-dimensional image reconstruction of insect flight muscle. II. The rigor actin layer , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  K A Taylor,et al.  The use of electron tomography for structural analysis of disordered protein arrays. , 1997, Journal of structural biology.

[26]  Kenneth A. Taylor,et al.  Multivariate statistical analysis of three-dimensional cross-bridge motifs in insect flight muscle , 1999 .

[27]  Marin van Heel,et al.  Multivariate statistical classification of noisy images (randomly oriented biological macromolecules) , 1984 .

[28]  K C Holmes,et al.  Binding of myosin subfragment 1 to glycerinated insect flight muscle in the rigor state. , 1985, Biophysical journal.

[29]  M. Irving,et al.  Orientation changes of the myosin light chain domain during filament sliding in active and rigor muscle. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  M. Reedy Cross-Bridges and Periods in Insect Flight Muscle , 1967 .

[31]  M. Unser,et al.  A new resolution criterion based on spectral signal-to-noise ratios. , 1987, Ultramicroscopy.

[32]  P. Knight Dynamic behaviour of the head-tail junction of myosin. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.