Applying Social Annotations to Retrieve and Re-rank Web Resources

Web-base tagging systems, which include social bookmarking systems such as del.icio.us, have become increasingly popular. These systems allow participants to annotate or tag web resources. This paper examined the use of social annotations to improve the quality of web search. It involved two components. First, social annotations were used to index resources. Two annotation-based indexing methods were proposed. Second, social annotations were used to improve search result ranking. Four annotation-based ranking methods were proposed. The result showed that using only annotation as an index of resources may not be appropriate. Since social annotations could be viewed as a high level concept of the content, combining them to the content of resource could add some more important concepts to the resources. The result also suggested that both static feature and similarity feature should be considered when using social annotations to re-rank search result.

[1]  Kevin S. McCurley,et al.  Analysis of anchor text for web search , 2003, SIGIR.

[2]  David Bargeron,et al.  Supporting interaction outside of class: anchored discussions vs. discussion boards , 2002, CSCL.

[3]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents , 2000, SIGIR '00.

[4]  Marcus Fontoura,et al.  Using annotations in enterprise search , 2006, WWW '06.

[5]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  AnnotatEd: A social navigation and annotation service for web-based educational resources , 2006, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[6]  Algirdas Avizienis,et al.  Position Paper , 1994, EDCC.

[7]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[8]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Shared annotation for cooperative learning , 1995, CSCL.

[9]  Stephen E. Robertson,et al.  Effective site finding using link anchor information , 2001, SIGIR '01.

[10]  Djoerd Hiemstra,et al.  Retrieving Web Pages Using Content, Links, URLs and Anchors , 2001, TREC.

[11]  Barry Smyth,et al.  Collecting community wisdom: integrating social search & social navigation , 2007, IUI '07.

[12]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Social Navigation Support Through Annotation-Based Group Modeling , 2005, User Modeling.

[13]  Hanqing Lu,et al.  Semantic knowledge extraction and annotation for web images , 2005, MULTIMEDIA '05.

[14]  M. Naaman,et al.  Position Paper, Tagging, Taxonomy, Flickr, Article, ToRead , 2006 .

[15]  Eric Brill,et al.  Beyond PageRank: machine learning for static ranking , 2006, WWW '06.

[16]  Joanna L. Wolfe,et al.  Effects of annotations on student readers and writers , 2000, DL '00.

[17]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[18]  Petri Nokelainen,et al.  Joint Annotation and Knowledge Building in Collaborative E-Learning , 2003 .

[19]  Andreas Hotho,et al.  FolkRank : A Ranking Algorithm for Folksonomies , 2006, LWA.

[20]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation , 1998, HYPERTEXT '98.

[21]  Yong Yu,et al.  Optimizing web search using social annotations , 2007, WWW '07.

[22]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents , 1997, CHI.

[23]  Wei-Ying Ma,et al.  Optimizing web search using web click-through data , 2004, CIKM '04.

[24]  Hongyuan Zha,et al.  Exploring social annotations for information retrieval , 2008, WWW.