A high-order compact difference algorithm for half-staggered grids for laminar and turbulent incompressible flows

Abstract The paper presents a novel, efficient and accurate algorithm for laminar and turbulent flow simulations. The spatial discretisation is performed with help of the compact difference schemes (up to 10th order) for collocated and half-staggered grid arrangements. The time integration is performed by a predictor–corrector approach combined with the projection method for pressure–velocity coupling. At this stage a low order discretisation is introduced which considerably decreases the computational costs. It is demonstrated that such approach does not deteriorate the solution accuracy significantly. Following Boersma B.J. [13] the interpolation formulas developed for staggered uniform meshes are used also in the computations with a non-uniform strongly varying nodes distribution. In the proposed formulation of the projection method such interpolation is performed twice. It is shown that it acts implicitly as a high-order low pass filter and therefore the resulting algorithm is very robust. Its accuracy is first demonstrated based on simple 2D and 3D problems: an inviscid vortex advection, a decay of Taylor–Green vortices, a modified lid-driven cavity flow and a dipole–wall interaction. In periodic flow problems (the first two cases) the solution accuracy exhibits the 10th order behaviour, in the latter cases the 3rd and the 4th order is obtained. Robustness of the proposed method in the computations of turbulent flows is demonstrated for two classical cases: a periodic channel with Re τ = 395 and Re τ = 590 and a round jet with Re = 21 000 . The solutions are obtained without any turbulence model and also without any explicit techniques aiming to stabilise the solution. The results are in a very good agreement with literature DNS and LES data, both the mean and r.m.s. values are predicted correctly.

[1]  A. Sadiki,et al.  A digital filter based generation of inflow data for spatially developing direct numerical or large eddy simulations , 2003 .

[2]  A. Veldman,et al.  Symmetry-preserving discretization of turbulent flow , 2003 .

[3]  F. Harlow,et al.  Numerical Calculation of Time‐Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with Free Surface , 1965 .

[4]  Richard Barrett,et al.  Templates for the Solution of Linear Systems: Building Blocks for Iterative Methods , 1994, Other Titles in Applied Mathematics.

[5]  Hjh Herman Clercx,et al.  Benchmark computations of the normal and oblique collision of a dipole with a no-slip boundary , 2006 .

[6]  Nikos Nikiforakis,et al.  ANALYSIS OF IMPLICIT LES METHODS , 2008 .

[7]  Jochen Fröhlich,et al.  LARGE EDDY SIMULATION OF VARIABLE DENSITY TURBULENT AXISYMMETRIC JETS , 2008, Proceeding of Fifth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena.

[8]  John A. Ekaterinaris,et al.  A staggered grid, high-order accurate method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[9]  Fabien Anselmet,et al.  Velocity turbulence properties in the near‐field region of axisymmetric variable density jets , 1996 .

[10]  B. J. Boersma,et al.  A staggered compact finite difference formulation for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2005 .

[11]  Herman Deconinck,et al.  Application of time preconditioning and high‐order compact discretization method for low Mach number flows , 2013 .

[12]  Marcelo H. Kobayashi,et al.  A fourth-order-accurate finite volume compact method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes solutions , 2001 .

[13]  P. Moin,et al.  Application of a Fractional-Step Method to Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 1984 .

[14]  Rémi Abgrall,et al.  High‐order CFD methods: current status and perspective , 2013 .

[15]  T. Poinsot Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows , 1992 .

[16]  C. Fletcher Computational techniques for fluid dynamics , 1992 .

[17]  T. A. Zang,et al.  Spectral methods for fluid dynamics , 1987 .

[18]  Joel H. Ferziger,et al.  Computational methods for fluid dynamics , 1996 .

[19]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  The Stability of Numerical Boundary Treatments for Compact High-Order Finite-Difference Schemes , 1993 .

[20]  B. Gustafsson The convergence rate for difference approximations to mixed initial boundary value problems , 1975 .

[21]  Xiaolin Zhong,et al.  Derivation of high-order compact finite difference schemes for non-uniform grid using polynomial interpolation , 2005 .

[22]  Mahidhar Tatineni,et al.  Very high-order compact finite difference schemes on non-uniform grids for incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[23]  R. Knikker,et al.  Study of a staggered fourth‐order compact scheme for unsteady incompressible viscous flows , 2009 .

[24]  Youhei Morinishi,et al.  Vector level identity for dynamic subgrid scale modeling in large eddy simulation , 2002 .

[25]  Swapan K. Pandit,et al.  A transient higher order compact scheme for incompressible viscous flows on geometries beyond rectangular , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[26]  Jan Nordström,et al.  Boundary conditions for a divergence free velocity-pressure formulation of the Navier-Stokes equations , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[27]  Toshio Kobayashi,et al.  Numerical solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with an upwind compact difference scheme , 1999 .

[28]  S. Lele Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution , 1992 .

[29]  F. Toschi,et al.  Shear-improved Smagorinsky model for large-eddy simulation of wall-bounded turbulent flows , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  Sylvain Laizet,et al.  High-order compact schemes for incompressible flows: A simple and efficient method with quasi-spectral accuracy , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[31]  Alan George,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Incompressible Flow (\em Re \protect\boldmath $\leq$ 9500) on the Curvilinear Half-Staggered Mesh , 2000, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[32]  Ghader Ghorbaniasl,et al.  A self-adjusting flow dependent formulation for the classical Smagorinsky model coefficient , 2013 .

[33]  P. Moin,et al.  Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows , 1988 .

[34]  Farzad Mashayek,et al.  A compact finite difference method on staggered grid for Navier–Stokes flows , 2006 .

[35]  F. Nicoud,et al.  Compact finite difference schemes on non-uniform meshes. Application to direct numerical simulations of compressible flows , 1999 .

[36]  B. Perot Conservation Properties of Unstructured Staggered Mesh Schemes , 2000 .

[37]  Michele Iovieno,et al.  A new large-eddy simulation near-wall treatment , 2004 .

[38]  Artur Tyliszczak,et al.  Projection method for high-order compact schemes for low Mach number flows in enclosures , 2014 .

[39]  John Kim,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOWS UP TO RE=590 , 1999 .

[40]  S. Patankar Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[41]  P. Moin,et al.  Fully Conservative Higher Order Finite Difference Schemes for Incompressible Flow , 1998 .

[42]  Li Yuan,et al.  Flux‐difference splitting‐based upwind compact schemes for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations , 2009 .

[43]  Andrew W. Cook,et al.  Direct Numerical Simulation of a Turbulent Reactive Plume on a Parallel Computer , 1996 .

[44]  Zhaosheng Yu,et al.  A direct-forcing fictitious domain method for particulate flows , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[45]  Fasma Diele,et al.  The use of the factorization of five-diagonal matrices by tridiagonal Toeplitz matrices☆ , 1998 .

[46]  Magnus Svärd,et al.  Review of summation-by-parts schemes for initial-boundary-value problems , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[47]  M. Minion,et al.  Accurate projection methods for the incompressible Navier—Stokes equations , 2001 .

[48]  Jan Vierendeels,et al.  A solution for the odd-even decoupling problem in pressure-correction algorithms for variable density flows , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[49]  Bendiks Jan Boersma,et al.  A 6th order staggered compact finite difference method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes and scalar transport equations , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[50]  Artur Tyliszczak,et al.  LES of Variable Density Bifurcating Jets , 2007 .

[51]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Large eddy simulation of a plane jet , 1999 .

[52]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes , 2002 .

[53]  Per Lötstedt,et al.  High order accurate solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2005 .

[54]  Huazhong Tang,et al.  An adaptive phase field method for the mixture of two incompressible fluids , 2007 .

[55]  Fotini Katopodes Chow,et al.  The effect of numerical errors and turbulence models in large-eddy simulations of channel flow, with and without explicit filtering , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[56]  Xian Liang,et al.  A higher order compact finite difference algorithm for solving the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations , 2011 .

[57]  Zhaosheng Yu,et al.  A fictitious domain method for particulate flows with heat transfer , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[58]  Joel H. Ferziger,et al.  A robust high-order compact method for large eddy simulation , 2003 .