Stress, neuromotor noise, and human performance : A theoretical perspective

A new theory on stress and human performance is proposed in which physical and cognitive stressors enhance the level of neuromotor noise in the information-processing system. The neuromotor noise propagates in time and space. A 2nd assumption states that such noise facilitates easy tasks but disrupts complex tasks. In 4 experiments, 2 graphic tasks (number writing and graphic aiming) were crossed with 2 stressors (cognitive stress from a dual-task situation and physical stress in the form of loud auditory noise). Reaction time (RT), movement time (MT), and axial pen pressure were measured. In the RT phase, stress was predicted to lead to decreased RT with easy tasks and to increased RT with difficult tasks. In the execution phase, biomechanical adaptation to enhanced levels of noise was expected to manifest in higher levels of limb stiffness. In all 4 experiments, an increase of axial pen pressure with higher levels of stress evidenced the generality of biomechanical adaptation as a response to stress. RT and MT showed differential effects among the 4 experiments.

[1]  Lambert Schomaker,et al.  FITTS LAW AS A LOW-PASS FILTER EFFECT OF MUSCLE-STIFFNESS , 1992 .

[2]  M. W. van der Molen,et al.  Intersensory facilitation and inhibition: immediate arousal and location effects of auditory noise on visual choice reaction time. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[3]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Structural complexity of motor patterns: A study on reaction times and movement times of handwritten letters , 1984 .

[4]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[5]  H. Neus,et al.  Traffic noise, a factor in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension. , 1982, Contributions to nephrology.

[6]  G. Matthews Extraversion and levels of control of sustained attention , 1989 .

[7]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Programming in handwriting: Reaction time and movement time as a function of sequence length , 1983 .

[8]  G. P. van Galen,et al.  Coordination of multi-joint movements: An introduction to emerging views , 1995 .

[9]  G. R. J. Hockey Effect of Loud Noise on Attentional Selectivity , 1970 .

[10]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Fitts' law as the outcome of a dynamic noise filtering model of motor control , 1995 .

[11]  T. Carr,et al.  Automaticity in skill acquisition: Mechanisms for reducing interference in concurrent performance. , 1989 .

[12]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  R. Cohen The Neuropsychology of Attention , 1993, Critical Issues in Neuropsychology.

[14]  K. Pribram,et al.  Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention. , 1975, Psychological review.

[15]  P. N. Kugler,et al.  Search Strategies and the Acquisition of Coordination , 1989 .

[16]  N. Cowan Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  P J Keuss,et al.  Auditory accessory effects on visual processing. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[18]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[19]  G. Borg,et al.  The variation of hand steadiness with physical stress. , 1981, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[21]  A Smith,et al.  A review of the effects of noise on human performance. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[22]  J. Swets,et al.  A decision-making theory of visual detection. , 1954, Psychological review.

[23]  Andrew P. Smith,et al.  A review of the non-auditory effects of noise on health , 1991 .

[24]  A W Gaillard,et al.  Comparing the concepts of mental load and stress. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[25]  A. H. C. Heijden,et al.  Visual selective attention: Introductory remarks , 1986, Psychological research.

[26]  Andrew Paul Smith,et al.  Activation states and semantic processing: A comparison of the effects of noise and time of day , 1987 .

[27]  Shirley Fisher,et al.  Stress And Strategy , 1986 .

[28]  Hans-Leo Teulings,et al.  The Elementary Units of Programming in Handwriting , 1986 .

[29]  R. Klein,et al.  Effects of arousal on human visual dominance , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  J.B.P. Veldman,et al.  Psychomotor and cardiovascular consequences of mental effort and noise , 1993 .

[31]  U. Castiello,et al.  Temporal dimensions of mental effort in different sports , 1988 .

[32]  Marcel Kinsbourne,et al.  Hemispheric disconnection and cerebral function , 1974 .

[33]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  THE ROLE OF SHORT-TERM MEMORY AND THE MOTOR BUFFER IN HANDWRITING UNDER VISUAL AND NON-VISUAL GUIDANCE , 1989 .

[34]  Michael W. Eysenck,et al.  A handbook of cognitive psychology , 1984 .

[35]  Henry S.R. Kao,et al.  Attentional Resources Allocation Process in Different Modes of Handwriting Control , 1986 .

[36]  A. McMichael,et al.  Man Under Stress , 1975 .

[37]  John P. Wann,et al.  The control of pen pressure in handwriting: A subtle point , 1991 .

[38]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  Levels of Motor Programming in Writing Familiar and Unfamiliar Symbols , 1988 .

[39]  A T Welford,et al.  Stress and performance. , 1973, Ergonomics.

[40]  Lambert Schomaker,et al.  Effects of motor programming on the power spectral density function of finger and wrist movements , 1990 .

[41]  T. Bergandi Psychological variables relating to the incidence of athletic injury: A review of the literature. , 1985 .

[42]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind : the third Paul M. Fitts lectures, delivered at the University of Michigan, September 1976 , 1978 .

[43]  A F Sanders,et al.  Resources and dual-task performance; resource allocation versus task integration. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[44]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[45]  H. Kao,et al.  Graphonomics : contemporary research in handwriting , 1986 .

[46]  C. Wickens Engineering psychology and human performance, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[47]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[48]  H. Frowein,et al.  Selective effects of barbiturate and amphetamine on information processing and response execution. , 1981, Acta psychologica.