Fume emissions from a low-cost 3-D printer with various filaments

ABSTRACT 3-D printing is an additive manufacturing process involving the injection of melted thermoplastic polymers, which are then laid down in layers to achieve a pre-designed shape. The heated deposition process raises concerns of potential aerosol and volatile organic compounds (VOC) emission and exposure. The decreasing cost of desktop 3-D printers has made the use of 3-D printers more acceptable in non-industrial workplaces lacking sufficient ventilation. Meanwhile, little is known about the characteristics of 3-D printing fume emission. The objective of this study was to characterize aerosols and VOC emissions generated from various filaments used with a low-cost 3-D printer in an environmental testing chamber. A pre-designed object was printed in 1.25 hours using eight types of filaments. A scanning mobility particle sizer and an aerodynamic particle sizer were employed to measure the particle size distribution in sub-half-micron fraction (<0.5 µm) and super-half-micron fraction (0.5–20 µm), respectively. VOC concentration was monitored real-time by a photoionization detector and sampled with a tri-sorbent thermal desorption tube, and analyzed by thermal desorption gas chromatography mass spectrometry (TD-GC/MS). Results showed high levels of fume particles emission rate (1.0 × 107 to 1.2 × 1010 #/min) in the sub-half-micron range with mode sizes of 41–83 nm. Particle concentrations peaked during the heat-up and solid layer printing periods. Total VOC concentration in the chamber followed a first-order buildup, with predominant VOC species in the chamber were breakdown and reaction products of the filaments, such as styrene from ABS filaments. These findings and exposure scenario estimation suggest that although the VOC concentrations were much lower than occupational exposure limits, particles with size less than micron might be a concern for users of low-cost 3-D printers due to high respirablity, especially if used in settings without proper guidance and engineering control.

[1]  Wenqian Zhu,et al.  Mechanical and thermal properties of (acrylonitrile‐styrene‐acrylic)/(α‐methylstyrene‐acrylonitrile) binary blends , 2016 .

[2]  P. Schulte,et al.  Occupational exposure limits for nanomaterials: state of the art , 2010 .

[3]  P. Azimi,et al.  Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Chris Keen,et al.  Airborne emissions of carcinogens and respiratory sensitizers during thermal processing of plastics. , 2013, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[5]  Sampling and Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Evolved During Thermal Processing of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Composite Resins , 1995 .

[6]  Xavier Intes,et al.  The integration of 3-D cell printing and mesoscopic fluorescence molecular tomography of vascular constructs within thick hydrogel scaffolds. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[7]  H. K. Fai,et al.  Characterization of VOCs, ozone, and PM10 emissions from office equipment in an environmental chamber , 2001 .

[8]  David W Brown,et al.  A Novel Method for Designing and Fabricating Low-cost Facepiece Prototypes , 2014, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[9]  Jidong Sun D-Limonene: safety and clinical applications. , 2007, Alternative medicine review : a journal of clinical therapeutic.

[10]  Derk H Brouwer,et al.  Control banding approaches for nanomaterials. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[11]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Distributed Manufacturing from 3-D Printing of Polymer Components and Products , 2013 .

[12]  Loura Hall 3D Printer Headed to Space Station , 2016 .

[13]  Carl T. Lira,et al.  Conversion of lactic acid to acrylic acid in near-critical water , 1993 .

[14]  Hermann Seitz,et al.  Ceramic scaffolds produced by computer-assisted 3D printing and sintering: characterization and biocompatibility investigations. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[15]  Leroy Cronin,et al.  Combining 3D printing and liquid handling to produce user-friendly reactionware for chemical synthesis and purification , 2013 .

[16]  T. Dragani,et al.  Libri Ricevuti: IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans , 1992 .

[17]  Michael E. Barsan,et al.  NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards , 2007 .

[18]  Michael J. Cima,et al.  Three Dimensional Printing: Rapid Tooling and Prototypes Directly from a CAD Model , 1992 .

[19]  C. Ponce de León,et al.  3D-Printing of Redox Flow Batteries for Energy Storage: A Rapid Prototype Laboratory Cell , 2015 .

[20]  Chungsik Yoon,et al.  Emissions of Nanoparticles and Gaseous Material from 3D Printer Operation. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  P. Azimi,et al.  Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers , 2013 .

[22]  R. Bockrath,et al.  Targeted mutation at cytosine-containing pyrimidine dimers: studies of Escherichia coli B/r with acetophenone and 313-nm light. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Patrick Steinle,et al.  Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer and indoor air measurements in office settings , 2016, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[24]  Yong Huang,et al.  Characterization of particulate matters and total VOC emissions from a binder jetting 3D printer , 2015 .

[25]  Barry Berman,et al.  3D printing: the new industrial revolution , 2012, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[26]  Michael Wensing,et al.  Evaluation of ultrafine particle emissions from laser printers using emission test chambers. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.