A multi-issue negotiation protocol among agents with nonlinear utility functions

Multi-Issue Negotiation protocols have been studied very widely and represent a promising field since most of negotiation problems in the real-world are complex ones including multiple issues. In particular, in reality issues are constrained each other. This makes agents' utilities nonlinear. There have been a lot of work on multi-issue negotiations. However, there have been very few work that focus on nonlinear utility spaces. In this paper, we assume agents have nonlinear utility spaces. For the linear utility domain, agents can aggregate the utilities of the issue-values by simple linear summation. In the real world, such aggregations are unrealistic. For example, we cannot just add up the value of car's tires and the value of car's engine when engineers design a car. In this paper, we propose an auction-based multiple-issue negotiation protocol among nonlinear utility agents. Our negotiation protocol employs several techniques, i.e., adjusting sampling, auction-based maximization of social welfare. Our experimental results show that our method can outperform the existing simple methods in particular in the huge utility space that can be often found in the real-world. Further, theoretically, our negotiation protocol can guarantee the completeness if some conditions are satisfied.

[1]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Automated multi-attribute negotiation with efficient use of incomplete preference information , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[2]  Xin Li,et al.  Adaptive, confidence-based multiagent negotiation strategy , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[3]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Adopt: asynchronous distributed constraint optimization with quality guarantees , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[5]  Mihai Barbuceanu,et al.  Multi-attribute Utility Theoretic Negotiation for Electronic Commerce , 2000, AMEC.

[6]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environments , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Hou-Kuan Huang,et al.  A learning-based multistage negotiation model , 2004, Proceedings of 2004 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04EX826).

[8]  Theodore Groves,et al.  Incentives in Teams , 1973 .

[9]  Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.  Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding , 2002 .

[10]  Toramatsu Shintani,et al.  An Architecture for Multi-agent Negotiation Using Private Preferences in a Meeting Scheduler , 1998, PRICAI.

[11]  T. Bosse,et al.  Human vs. computer behavior in multi-issue negotiation , 2005, Rational, Robust, and Secure Negotiation Mechanisms in Multi-Agent Systems (RRS'05).

[12]  Jacques L. Koko,et al.  The Art and Science of Negotiation , 2009 .

[13]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Distributed Constraint Satisfaction: Foundations of Cooperation in Multi-agent Systems , 2000 .

[14]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  A multi-issue negotiation protocol among competitive agents and its extension to a nonlinear utility negotiation protocol , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[15]  Zhuoqun Xu,et al.  Offer Group Generation and Delayed Processing in Multi-Issue Negotiation , 2004, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'04).

[16]  Mark Klein,et al.  Negotiating Complex Contracts , 2003, AAMAS '02.

[17]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Optimal negotiation of multiple issues in incomplete information settings , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[18]  Ismel Brito Rodriguez,et al.  Distributed constraint satisfaction , 2007 .

[19]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation , 2004, Artif. Intell..

[20]  Toramatsu Shintani,et al.  Persuasion among Agents: An Approach to Implementing a Group Decision System Based on Multi-Agent Negotiation , 1997, IJCAI.

[21]  Raymond Y. K. Lau Towards Genetically Optimised Multi-Agent Multi-Issue Negotiations , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  Persuasion among Agents : An Approach to Implementing a Group Decision Support System Based on Multi-Agent Negotiation , 1997 .

[23]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  An Agent Architecture for Multi-Attribute Negotiation , 2001, IJCAI.

[24]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Robust Combinatorial Auction Protocol against False-Name Bids , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.