Contextual Inquiry of Affordances for Collaboration in Crisis: Lessons from the Finnish Context

The COVID-19 pandemic followed by the energy crisis in Europe demonstrates how complex crises can be. Being embedded in a digital media environment and global interdependencies, complex crises elude straightforward interpretations and explanations. Nonetheless, crises require fast and coordinated response from multiple public authorities. In recent years, advances in computational methods and information technology have influenced the field of crisis and disaster management, and diverse technical approaches have been developed to enhance authorities’ response to crises. Drawing on a relational approach to crises, we investigate the socio-technical affordances emerging in Finland to facilitate multi-actor collaboration in crises. Based on our analysis, we argue that contemporary practices and technologies do not match with the complexity of recent crises. Taken together, we consider the role of digital technologies and socio-technical practices to better support multi-actor sensemaking and collaboration in future crises.

[1]  Ricardo Usbeck,et al.  The Ethical Risks of Analyzing Crisis Events on Social Media with Machine Learning , 2022, D2R2.

[2]  Tze-Chang Liu.  Digital policy in European countries from the perspective of the Digital Economy and Society Index , 2021, Policy & Internet.

[3]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[4]  Himani Mittal,et al.  Review of ICT usage in disaster management , 2020 .

[5]  Hanna Tiirinki,et al.  COVID-19 pandemic in Finland – Preliminary analysis on health system response and economic consequences , 2020, Health Policy and Technology.

[6]  S. Moisio.  State power and the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of Finland , 2020, Eurasian Geography and Economics.

[7]  D. Coley,et al.  The potential for computational IT tools in disaster relief and shelter design , 2020 .

[8]  Andrew M. Hardin,et al.  Information Technology and organizational innovation: Harmonious information technology affordance and courage-based actualization , 2020, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems.

[9]  Thomas Ludwig,et al.  Better Supporting Workers in ML Workplaces , 2019, CSCW Companion.

[10]  Deedee Bennett.  Information and Communication Technology in Crisis and Disaster Management , 2019, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.

[11]  R. Bossu,et al.  Truth, Trust, and Civic Duty: Cultural Factors in Citizens' Perceptions of Mobile Phone Apps and Social Media in Disasters , 2019, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management.

[12]  Rasmus Dahlberg,et al.  Local social services in disaster management : Is there a Nordic model? , 2018 .

[13]  Simon Andrews,et al.  Identification of Critical Factors in Large Crisis Decision Making Processes Using Computational Tools: The Case of ATHENA , 2017, Int. J. Strateg. Inf. Technol. Appl..

[14]  Sophia B. Liu,et al.  Crisis Informatics and Collaboration: A Brief Introduction , 2014, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[15]  N. McGlynn.  Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[16]  Andrea H. Tapia,et al.  Good Enough is Good Enough: Overcoming Disaster Response Organizations’ Slow Social Media Data Adoption , 2014, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[17]  I. Prezelj.  Inter-organizational Cooperation and Coordination in the Fight against Terrorism: From Undisputable Necessity to Paradoxical Challenges , 2014 .

[18]  Cynthia E. Renaud,et al.  Orchestrating Joint Sensemaking Across Government Levels: Challenges and Requirements for Crisis Leadership , 2013 .

[19]  Denis Fischbacher-Smith,et al.  Crisis management in a complex world , 2010 .

[20]  Teemu Leinonen,et al.  Information Architecture and Design Solutions Scaffolding Authoring of Open Educational Resources , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[21]  R. Ulmer,et al.  Considering the Future of Crisis Communication Research: Understanding the Opportunities Inherent to Crisis Events through the Discourse of Renewal , 2010 .

[22]  Dawn R. Gilpin,et al.  Complexity and Crises: A New Paradigm , 2010 .

[23]  Finn Frandsen,et al.  Crisis Communication, Complexity, and the Cartoon Affair: A Case Study , 2010 .

[24]  H. Canton,et al.  International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies , 2009, Permanent Missions to the United Nations, No. 309.

[25]  P. Pirolli,et al.  Sensemaking , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  B. Greve.  What Characterise the Nordic Welfare State Model , 2007 .

[27]  B. Verbeek.  The Politics of Crisis Management. Public Leadership Under Pressure , 2006 .

[28]  Louise K. Comfort,et al.  Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: The World Trade Center attacks, September 11, 2001 , 2006 .

[29]  K. Newton,et al.  Predicting Cross-National Levels of Social Trust: Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism? , 2005 .

[30]  W. T. Coombs,et al.  Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding , 1999 .

[31]  Margaret Ferley,et al.  The American Review of Public Administration , 1993 .

[32]  Christian Reuter.  A European perspective on crisis informatics: citizens' and authorities' attitudes towards social media for public safety and security , 2022 .

[33]  Anouck Adrot,et al.  A Consolidated Understanding of Disaster Community Technologies , 2021, ISCRAM.

[34]  I. Helsloot,et al.  Why Technology Not Always Adds Value to Crisis Managers During Crisis: The Case of The Dutch Nation-Wide Crisis Management System LCMS , 2021, ISCRAM.

[35]  Fernando Diaz,et al.  Extracting information nuggets from disaster- Related messages in social media , 2013, ISCRAM.

[36]  S. Faraj,et al.  The Materiality of Technology: An Affordance Perspective , 2013 .

[37]  Teemu Leinonen,et al.  Designing Learning Tools. Methodological Insights , 2010 .

[38]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[39]  P. Pirolli,et al.  The Sensemaking Process and Leverage Points for Analyst Technology as Identified Through Cognitive Task Analysis , 2015 .

[40]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .