A Survey on User Acceptance of Wireless Electric Vehicle Charging

This study presents results of a survey-based analysis on user acceptance of wireless electric vehicle charging. A structural equation model is developed based on Davis’ technology acceptance model (TAM). It is expanded integrating elements of Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior (TPB). The main factors influencing acceptance of wireless electric vehicle charging are evaluated and analyzed. Empirical findings indicate that survey participants’ acceptance of wireless electric vehicle charging is mainly influenced by affective evaluations of wireless charging, subjective norms, perceived usefulness of wireless charging, and environmental awareness. The results indicate a high degree of acceptance for wireless charging. Even individuals with lower degrees of acceptance are willing to use wireless charging within car-sharing or commercial fleets.

[1]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Die Kausalanalyse in der empirischen betriebswirtschaftlichen Forschung - Problemfelder und Anwendungsempfehlungen , 2006 .

[2]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[3]  Patrick Jochem,et al.  The potential of carbon dioxide emission reductions in German commercial transport by electric vehicles , 2014, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[4]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Dongsuk Kum,et al.  Economic Analysis of the Dynamic Charging Electric Vehicle , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[6]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[7]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in Advertising Research: Basic Concepts and Recent Issues , 2012 .

[8]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[9]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[10]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[11]  K. Dudenhöffer.  Akzeptanz von Elektroautos in Deutschland und China: eine Untersuchung von Nutzungsintentionen im Anfangsstadium der Innovationsdiffusion , 2014 .

[12]  Wolf Fichtner,et al.  Experiences of EV users in the French-German context , 2013, 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27).

[13]  James A. Roberts.  Profiling Levels of Socially Responsible Consumer Behavior: A Cluster Analytic Approach and Its Implications for Marketing , 1995 .

[14]  Patrick Jochem,et al.  Cross-border Mobility for Electric Vehicles: Selected results from one of the first cross-border field tests in Europe , 2016 .

[15]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Technology Readiness Index (Tri) , 2000 .

[16]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  A New and Simple Approach to Multi-Group Analysis in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2007 .

[17]  Patrick Jochem,et al.  Willingness to Pay for E-Mobility Services : A Case Study from Germany , 2016 .

[18]  Silke Borgstedt,et al.  Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2010. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage , 2011 .

[19]  Stephanie Arndt,et al.  Evaluierung der Akzeptanz von Fahrerassistenzsystemen , 2011 .

[20]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[21]  Barbara Deml,et al.  Nutzerverhalten beim Laden von Elektrofahrzeugen , 2011 .

[22]  E. Kuntsche,et al.  Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. , 2001 .

[23]  Frank Huber,et al.  Varianz- und kovarianzbasierte Strukturgleichungsmodelle — Ein Leitfaden zu deren Spezifikation, Schätzung und Beurteilung , 2006 .

[24]  Barbara Lenz,et al.  Erstnutzer von Elektrofahrzeugen in Deutschland. Nutzerprofile, Anschaffung, Fahrzeugnutzung. , 2015 .

[25]  Frank Huber,et al.  Kausalmodellierung mit partial least squares : eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung , 2007 .

[26]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[27]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[28]  Reid R. Heffner,et al.  Symbolism in California’s Early Market for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007 .

[29]  Anja Peters,et al.  Electric mobility – a survey of different consumer groups in germany with regard to adoption , 2011 .

[30]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory , 1982 .

[31]  Ludwig Fazel.  Akzeptanz von Elektromobilität , 2014 .

[32]  Richard W. Carlson,et al.  Test Results of the PLUGLESS™ Inductive Charging System from Evatran Group, Inc. , 2014 .

[33]  Georg Fassott,et al.  Operationalisierung latenter Variablen in Strukturgleichungsmodellen: Eine Standortbestimmung , 2006 .

[34]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing , 2002 .

[35]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[36]  Patrick Jochem,et al.  Can product service systems support electric vehicle adoption? , 2020 .

[37]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[38]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[39]  Hans-Christian Reuss,et al.  Fully Charged: Process Acceptance of Different EV Charging Processes , 2016 .

[40]  M. Wietschel,et al.  Induktives Laden von Elektromobilen – Eine techno-ökonomische Bewertung , 2011 .

[41]  S. Bamberg,et al.  Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour , 2007 .

[42]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[44]  Thomas Bräunl,et al.  Acceptability of Electric Vehicles: Findings from a driver survey , 2012 .

[45]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[46]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[47]  W. Bearden,et al.  Consumer Innovativeness and the Adoption Process , 1995 .