Evaluation of a 3D point cloud tetrahedral tomographic reconstruction method.

Tomographic reconstruction on an irregular grid may be superior to reconstruction on a regular grid. This is achieved through an appropriate choice of the image space model, the selection of an optimal set of points and the use of any available prior information during the reconstruction process. Accordingly, a number of reconstruction-related parameters must be optimized for best performance. In this work, a 3D point cloud tetrahedral mesh reconstruction method is evaluated for quantitative tasks. A linear image model is employed to obtain the reconstruction system matrix and five point generation strategies are studied. The evaluation is performed using the recovery coefficient, as well as voxel- and template-based estimates of bias and variance measures, computed over specific regions in the reconstructed image. A similar analysis is performed for regular grid reconstructions that use voxel basis functions. The maximum likelihood expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm is used. For the tetrahedral reconstructions, of the five point generation methods that are evaluated, three use image priors. For evaluation purposes, an object consisting of overlapping spheres with varying activity is simulated. The exact parallel projection data of this object are obtained analytically using a parallel projector, and multiple Poisson noise realizations of these exact data are generated and reconstructed using the different point generation strategies. The unconstrained nature of point placement in some of the irregular mesh-based reconstruction strategies has superior activity recovery for small, low-contrast image regions. The results show that, with an appropriately generated set of mesh points, the irregular grid reconstruction methods can out-perform reconstructions on a regular grid for mathematical phantoms, in terms of the performance measures evaluated.

[1]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  A fast approach for accurate content-adaptive mesh generation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[2]  Miguel Ángel García,et al.  Efficient approximation of range images through data-dependent adaptive triangulations , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  Suleman Surti,et al.  A recovery coefficient method for partial volume correction of PET images , 2009, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[4]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Multi-modality tomographic image reconstruction using mesh modeling , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[5]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Tomographic image reconstruction based on a content-adaptive mesh model , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Content-adaptive mesh modeling for fully-3D tomographic image reconstruction , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[7]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  L. Geworski,et al.  Use of recovery coefficients as a test of system linearity of response in positron emission tomography (PET). , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Ronald H. Huesman,et al.  Tomographic reconstruction using an adaptive tetrahedral mesh defined by a point cloud , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Yuesheng Xu,et al.  Optimized mesh generation for OSEM SPECT reconstruction , 2009 .

[12]  G. Saha Basics Of Pet Imaging: Physics, Chemistry, And Regulations , 2004 .

[13]  Julian J. Faraway,et al.  Practical Regression and Anova using R , 2002 .

[14]  T R Miller,et al.  Design and use of PET tomographs: the effect of slice spacing. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  W. Jentzen Experimental investigation of factors affecting the absolute recovery coefficients in iodine-124 PET lesion imaging , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Lee D. Davisson,et al.  An Introduction To Statistical Signal Processing , 2004 .

[17]  Dmitri A. Gusev,et al.  Hybrid Algorithms for Digital Halftoning and Their Application to Medical Imaging , 1997, Comput. Graph..

[18]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Recursive filtering and edge tracking: two primary tools for 3D edge detection , 1991, Image Vis. Comput..