Climate-based archetypes for the environmental fate assessment of chemicals.

Emissions of chemicals have been on the rise for years, and their impacts are greatly influenced by spatial differentiation. Chemicals are usually emitted locally but their impact can be felt both locally and globally, due to their chemical properties and persistence. The variability of environmental parameters in the emission compartment may affect the chemicals' fate and the exposure at different orders of magnitude. The assessment of the environmental fate of chemicals and the inherent spatial differentiation requires the use of multimedia models at various levels of complexity (from a simple box model to complex computational and high-spatial-resolution models). The objective of these models is to support ecological and human health risk assessment, by reducing the uncertainty of chemical impact assessments. The parameterisation of spatially resolved multimedia models is usually based on scenarios of evaluative environments, or on geographical resolutions related to administrative boundaries (e.g. countries/continents) or landscape areas (e.g. watersheds, eco-regions). The choice of the most appropriate scale and scenario is important from a management perspective, as a balance should be reached between a simplified approach and computationally intensive multimedia models. In this paper, which aims to go beyond the more traditional approach based on scale/resolution (cell, country, and basin), we propose and assess climate-based archetypes for the impact assessment of chemicals released in air. We define the archetypes based on the main drivers of spatial variability, which we systematically identify by adopting global sensitivity analysis techniques. A case study that uses the high resolution multimedia model MAPPE (Multimedia Assessment of Pollutant Pathways in the Environment) is presented. Results of the analysis showed that suitable archetypes should be both climate- and chemical-specific, as different chemicals (or groups of them) have different traits that influence their spatial variability. This hypothesis was tested by comparing the variability of the output of MAPPE for four different climatic zones on four different continents for four different chemicals (which represent different combinations of physical and chemical properties). Results showed the high suitability of climate-based archetypes in assessing the impacts of chemicals released in air. However, further research work is still necessary to test these findings.

[1]  Zulian Grazia,et al.  Multimedia assessment of pollutant pathways in the environment: a Global scale model , 2011 .

[2]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Modeling the influence of intermittent rain events on long-term fate and transport of organic air pollutants. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[4]  Fabrice Gamboa,et al.  Local Polynomial Estimation for Sensitivity Analysis on Models With Correlated Inputs , 2008, Technometrics.

[5]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Using information on uncertainty to improve environmental fate modeling: a case study on DDT. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[7]  K. Shuler,et al.  A STUDY OF THE SENSITIVITY OF COUPLED REACTION SYSTEMS TO UNCERTAINTIES IN RATE COEFFICIENTS . II , 2014 .

[8]  Torsten Meyer,et al.  Illustrating sensitivity and uncertainty in environmental fate models using partitioning maps. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Mark A J Huijbregts,et al.  Empirical evaluation of spatial and non-spatial European-scale multimedia fate models: results and implications for chemical risk assessment. , 2007, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[10]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Case Study on Plant-Protection Products and Implications for Decision Making (9 pp + 3 pp) , 2005 .

[11]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2015 .

[12]  B. Rudolf,et al.  World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated , 2006 .

[13]  D Mackay,et al.  Development of continental scale multimedia contaminant fate models: Integrating GIS , 2001, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[14]  Anne Hollander,et al.  Substance or space? The relative importance of substance properties and environmental characteristics in modeling the fate of chemicals in Europe , 2009, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[15]  David Pennington,et al.  Spatial differentiation of chemical removal rates from air in life cycle impact assessment , 2011 .

[16]  Zulian Grazia,et al.  Multimedia Assessment of Pollutant Pathways in the Environment, European Scale Model (MAPPE-EUROPE) , 2010 .

[17]  F. Wania,et al.  Estimating the influence of forests on the overall fate of semivolatile organic compounds using a multimedia fate model. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  A. Saltelli,et al.  On the Relative Importance of Input Factors in Mathematical Models , 2002 .

[19]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Implications of considering metal bioavailability in estimates of freshwater ecotoxicity: examination of two case studies , 2011 .

[20]  T. McMahon,et al.  Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification , 2007 .

[21]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Part II: spatial differentiation in life-cycle assessment via the site-dependent characterisation of environmental impact from emissions , 1997 .

[22]  Antonio Finizio,et al.  GIS-based system for surface water risk assessment of agricultural chemicals. 1. Methodological approach. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[24]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models , 2004 .

[25]  D Mackay,et al.  BETR-World: a geographically explicit model of chemical fate: application to transport of alpha-HCH to the Arctic. , 2004, Environmental pollution.

[26]  Kevin C Jones,et al.  A dynamic level IV multimedia environmental model: Application to the fate of polychlorinated biphenyls in the United Kingdom over a 60‐year period , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[27]  I. Krieger,et al.  Configuration of a Polyelectrolyte Chain in Solution , 1957 .

[28]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[29]  A. Pistocchi Fate and Transport Models , 2008 .

[30]  C. Fortuin,et al.  Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I Theory , 1973 .

[31]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Estimation of global sensitivity indices for models with dependent variables , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[32]  Matthew MacLeod,et al.  Evaluating and expressing the propagation of uncertainty in chemical fate and bioaccumulation models , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[33]  Xiusheng Yang,et al.  Dynamic modeling of chemical fate and transport in multimedia environments at watershed scale-I: theoretical considerations and model implementation. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[34]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Multimedia fate and human intake modeling: spatial versus nonspatial insights for chemical emissions in Western Europe. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  D Mackay,et al.  BETR North America: A regionally segmented multimedia contaminant fate model for North America , 2001, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[36]  K. Hungerbühler,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Case Study on Plant - Protection Products and Implications for Decision Making (3 pp) , 2005 .

[37]  R. Heijungs,et al.  GLOBOX: A spatially differentiated global fate, intake and effect model for toxicity assessment in LCA. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[38]  Zulian Grazia,et al.  Global Atlas of Environmental Parameters for Chemical Fate and Transport Assessment , 2010 .

[39]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  Mark Goedkoop,et al.  Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards Best Practice , 2002 .