Preserving Continuity of Long-Term Daily Maximum and Minimum Temperature Observations with Automation of Reference Climate Stations using Overlapping Data and Meteorological Conditions

ABSTRACT The seasonal-by-wind bias method for aligning time series of daily maximum and minimum temperatures from past conventional staffed and new automated sites using closely collocated, overlapping observations is presented for twenty-two modernized Reference Climate Stations in Canada. The method consists of adjusting for incompatible observing times and deriving biases from the daily “manual-minus-automated” temperature differences classified into seasons and wind-speed conditions. Most of the biases vary with the season, and many show limited wind dependency. Four sets of adjusted time series are prepared based on two-year and five-year overlapping data and on seasonal bias with or without wind conditions; the adjusted data are compared with the original observations. Based on the mean of the absolute differences and examination of box plots, the results show that, for this particular set of stations, the two-year versus five-year and seasonal versus seasonal-by-wind bias adjusted time series are overall similar. The largest contribution to the improvements in the adjusted observations came from matching the times of observation. Additionally, daily temperatures are adjusted using statistical methods applied with neighbouring station data but no overlapping observations at collocated stations; it is concluded that these do not necessarily resolve the bias between staffed and automated sites.

[1]  Henri Caussinus,et al.  SPLIDHOM: A Method for Homogenization of Daily Temperature Observations , 2011 .

[2]  K. G. Hubbard,et al.  Reexamination of instrument change effects in the U.S. Historical Climatology Network , 2006 .

[3]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Impact of Aligning Climatological Day on Gridding Daily Maximum–Minimum Temperature and Precipitation over Canada , 2011 .

[4]  Paul H. Whitfield,et al.  Why the Provenance of Data Matters: Assessing Fitness for Purpose for Environmental Data , 2012 .

[5]  W. D. Hogg,et al.  Homogenization of Daily Temperatures over Canada , 2002 .

[6]  A. C. F. Trevitt,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPOSITE TEMPERATURE RECORDS , 1996 .

[7]  K. Kunkel,et al.  Changes in Instruments and Sites Affecting Historical Weather Records: A Case Study , 2006 .

[8]  Christopher A. Fiebrich,et al.  Automation: A Step toward Improving the Quality of Daily Temperature Data Produced by Climate Observing Networks* , 2009 .

[9]  R. Leeper,et al.  Observational perspectives from U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) and Cooperative Observer Program (COOP) network: temperature and precipitation comparison. , 2015 .

[10]  Yuehua Wu,et al.  New Techniques for the Detection and Adjustment of Shifts in Daily Precipitation Data Series , 2010 .

[11]  B. Trewin A daily homogenized temperature data set for Australia , 2013 .

[12]  Xiaolan L. Wang,et al.  A second generation of homogenized Canadian monthly surface air temperature for climate trend analysis , 2012 .

[13]  Jesse,et al.  U.S. Climate Reference Network after One Decade of Operations: Status and Assessment , 2013 .

[14]  T. Karl,et al.  A Comparative Study of ASOS and USCRN Temperature Measurements , 2005 .

[15]  Della,et al.  A Method of Homogenizing the Extremes and Mean of Daily Temperature Measurements , 2006 .

[16]  Blair Trewin,et al.  Exposure, instrumentation, and observing practice effects on land temperature measurements , 2010 .

[17]  N. B. Guttman,et al.  Exploratory analysis of the difference between temperature observations recorded by ASOS and conventional methods , 1996 .

[18]  Spatial representativeness of a long‐term climate network in Canada , 2001 .

[19]  Heinz Wanner,et al.  A Method of Homogenizing the Extremes and Mean of Daily Temperature Measurements , 2006 .

[20]  K. Hubbard,et al.  On the USCRN Temperature System , 2005 .

[21]  Xiaolan L. Wang,et al.  Observed Changes in One-in-20 Year Extremes of Canadian Surface Air Temperatures , 2013 .

[22]  K. G. Hubbard,et al.  Air Temperature Comparison between the MMTS and the USCRN Temperature Systems , 2004 .

[23]  Kevin P. Gallo,et al.  Evaluation of Temperature Differences for Paired Stations of the U.S. Climate Reference Network , 2005 .

[24]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Microclimate Exposures of Surface-Based Weather Stations: Implications For The Assessment of Long-Term Temperature Trends. , 2005 .

[25]  L. Vincent,et al.  Bias in Minimum Temperature Introduced by a Redefinition of the Climatological Day at the Canadian Synoptic Stations , 2009 .

[26]  W. D. Hogg,et al.  Continuity of climatological observations with automation ‐ temperature and precipitation amounts from AWOS (Automated Weather Observing System) , 2002 .