An analytic network process approach to operationalization of five forces model

Abstract The five forces model has been one of the most influential frameworks for strategic management. In contrast to its importance as a centerpiece of textbooks, however, it has attracted less attention from both academic researchers and practicing managers. This is due to its innate weakness, difficulty in operationalization. The vital requisites for operationalizing the five forces model are to deal with it as a complex system composed of interrelated forces and their sub-forces, and to prioritize them with consideration of their interdependency. The tenet of this study is the requisites can be achieved through the analytic network process (ANP). The ANP, which is a generalization of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), produces priorities of elements in a complex network model with consideration of interdependency among elements. The five forces model is transformed into a network model of the ANP. The ANP procedure is then carried out to obtain the priority weights of the forces. Combining the derived weights and ratings on the forces produces the state-of-industry-competition index (SICI) values that represent the overall competitive condition of a given industry. The working of the proposed approach is provided with the help of a case study example of the Web portal Industry of Korea. The proposed ANP approach is expected to expand the five forces model into a workable system of analysis by improving its analytical power.

[1]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[2]  Sora Lee,et al.  Selection of technology acquisition mode using the analytic network process , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[3]  F. Partovi An analytic model to quantify strategic service vision , 2001 .

[4]  Metin Dagdeviren,et al.  Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis - A case study for a textile firm , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[5]  L. C. Leung,et al.  Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network process , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  Six cases of corporate strategic responses to environmental regulation , 2000 .

[7]  Yongtae Park,et al.  An analytic network process approach to measuring design change impacts in modular products , 2010 .

[8]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks , 2005 .

[9]  Lester C. Thurow,et al.  The Delta Project: Discovering New Sources of Profitability in a Networked Economy , 2001 .

[10]  Tony Grundy,et al.  Rethinking and reinventing Michael Porter's five forces model , 2006 .

[11]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach , 1989 .

[12]  Cevriye Gencer,et al.  Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm , 2007 .

[13]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP , 2011 .

[14]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[15]  Ye-Sho Chen,et al.  Decision Criteria Consolidation: A Theoretical Foundation of Pareto Principle to Porter's Competitive Forces , 2001, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[16]  M. Porter How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy , 1989 .

[17]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[18]  Metin Dagdeviren,et al.  Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Umut Asan,et al.  Identifying strategic management concepts: An analytic network process approach , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[20]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[21]  Nasrin Asgari,et al.  Multiple criteria facility location problems: A survey , 2010 .