An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia

1. We studied factors affecting emigration and immigration behaviour in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia by releasing 882 newly emerged marked butterflies into 16 habitat patches in a network of 64 empty patches on an isolated island (area 1.6 km 2 ). 2. Of the 363 butterflies that were recaptured at least once, 40% were recorded in a new patch during their lifetime. Females emigrated earlier and moved further away than males. One-third of males appeared to remain permanently in, whereas females gradually drifted away from, the release patch. 3. High density of butterflies, great abundance of flowers, and large patch area decreased emigration, whereas open landscape around the patch increased emigration. Females that emigrated were on average larger than females that stayed in the patch of release. 4. In total, 152 immigrants were recorded in 32 patches. Numbers of immigrants increased with patch area and abundance of flowering plants. 5. Results on emigration suggest that conserving an isolated butterfly population is more successful in an area with physical barriers to migration than in an open landscape. The possible tendency of butterflies to leave a patch with low density should be taken into consideration in introductions of butterflies to empty habitat patches. 6. Results on immigration indicate the significance of nectar sources and patch size in successful colonization of empty habitat patches.

[1]  A. Shapiro.  The Role of Sexual Behavior in Density-Related Dispersal of Pierid Butterflies , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[2]  M. Warren.  A review of butterfly conservation in central southern Britain: I. Protection, evaluation and extinction on prime sites , 1993 .

[3]  M E Gilpin,et al.  Calculation of immigration and extinction curves from the species-area-distance relation. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Population genetics of euphydryas butterflies. I Genetic variation and the neutrality hypothesis. , 1975, Genetics.

[5]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Can Sex Ratio be Defined or Determined? The Case of a Population of Checkerspot Butterflies , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[6]  M. Baguette,et al.  Dispersal, colonization power and metapopulation structure in the vulnerable butterfly Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae) , 1996 .

[7]  Mark V. Lomolino.  The target area hypothesis: the influence of island area on immigration rates of non-volant mammals , 1990 .

[8]  J. Scott.  Flight Patterns among Eleven Species of Diurnal Lepidoptera , 1975 .

[9]  I. Hanski,et al.  Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Conservation of fragmented populations , 1994 .

[11]  M. Warren.  The ecology and conservation of the heath fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia. II. Adult population structure and mobility , 1987 .

[12]  A. Pullin.  Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies , 1995, Springer Netherlands.

[13]  C. Thomas,et al.  Butterfly Conservation Management , 1995 .

[14]  J. Dempster.  7 – Fragmentation, Isolation and Mobility of Insect Populations , 1991 .

[15]  Chris D. Thomas,et al.  Partial recovery of a skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) from population refuges : lessons for conservation in a fragmented landscape , 1993 .

[16]  Uno Wennergren,et al.  Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes , 1995, Nature.

[17]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: A spatially explicit model applied to butterflies , 1994 .

[18]  Chris D. Thomas,et al.  Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies : implications for metapopulation structure , 1996 .

[19]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Conservation Lessons from Long-Term Studies of Checkerspot Butterflies , 1987 .

[20]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[21]  J. Thomas.  Rare species conservation: case studies of European butterflies , 1991 .

[22]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Multiple equilibria in metapopulation dynamics , 1995, Nature.

[23]  M. Baguette,et al.  Adult movements between populations in the specialist butterfly Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) , 1994 .

[24]  C. Thomas,et al.  Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species , 1992 .

[25]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Directions in conservation biology , 1994 .

[26]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape , 1995 .

[27]  L. Gilbert,et al.  Dispersal and Gene Flow in a Butterfly Species , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[28]  R. A. Arnold.  Ecological studies of six endangered butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) : island biogeography, patch dynamics, and the design of habitat preserves , 1983 .

[29]  J. Thomas,et al.  Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland , 1984 .

[30]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia , 1994 .

[31]  T. Shreeve.  Habitat selection, mate location, and microclimatic constraints on the activity of the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria , 1984 .

[32]  L. Hansson,et al.  Dispersal and connectivity in metapopulations , 1991 .

[33]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  Earth's peeling veneer of life , 1995, Nature.

[34]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics : empirical and theoretical investigations , 1991 .

[35]  M. King,et al.  The status of the swallowtail butterfly in Britain , 1976 .

[36]  R. R. White,et al.  Temporal Variation in Vagility: Implications for Evolutionary Studies , 1981 .

[37]  L. Gall.  Population structure and recommendations for conservation of the narrowly endemic alpine butterfly, Boloria acrocnema (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae) , 1984 .

[38]  P. Brakefield.  Ecological studies on the butterfly Maniola jurtina in Britain. II. Population dynamics: the present position , 1982 .

[39]  I. Swingland,et al.  The Ecology of Animal Movement , 1985 .

[40]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Population biology of the checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas chalcedona structure of the Jasper Ridge colony , 2004, Oecologia.

[41]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  Distribution of the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis: Evidence for a Metapopulation Model , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[42]  M. Warren.  The UK status and suspected metapopulation structure of a threatened European butterfly, the marsh fritillary Eurodryas aurinia , 1994 .

[43]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Minimum Viable Metapopulation Size , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[44]  R. Macarthur,et al.  A Field's Capacity to support a Butterfly Population , 1964, Nature.

[45]  C. Thomas.  Extinction, colonization, and metapopulations: environmental tracking by rare species , 1994 .

[46]  C. Thomas.  Ecology and conservation of butterfly metapopulations in the fragmented British landscape , 1995 .

[47]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  The Effects of Edge Permeability and Habitat Geometry on Emigration from Patches of Habitat , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[48]  J. Heath.  Threatened Rhopalocera (butterflies) in Europe , 1981 .

[49]  C. Bernstein.  Density‐dependent changes in sex ratio in Colias lesbia (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) , 1980 .

[50]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Chapter 8 – Butterfly Metapopulation Dynamics , 1995 .

[51]  S. Harrison,et al.  Long-distance dispersal and colonization in the Bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis , 1989 .

[52]  M. Warren,et al.  Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes , 1992, Oecologia.

[53]  J. Thomas.  Holocene climate changes and warm man‐made refugia may explain why a sixth of British butterflies possess unnatural early‐successional habitats , 1993 .