The Harrier YAV-8B aircraft is capable of vertical and short-field take-off and landing (V/STOL) by directing its four exhaust nozzles toward the ground, or conventional flight by rotating its nozzles into a horizontal position. The British Royal Air Force and the United States Marine Corps have used this aircraft for more than 30 years to provide a quick reaction time for troop support, and reduce the need for long runways. The success of this powered-lift (PL) vehicle has also prompted the more recent design of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). However there are significant safety issues that must be addressed when operating a PL vehicle in close proximity to the ground. Hot Gas Ingestion (HGI) by the inlets can result in a rapid loss of powered lift; and high-speed jet flows along the ground plane can induce low pressures underneath the vehicle, causing a 'suck-down' effect. Under these conditions, departure from controlled flight may occur. Moreover, unsteady ground vortices and jet fountains can affect the aircraft,s controllability and its proximity to ground troops. The viscous, time-dependent flow fields of PL vehicles are difficult to accurately and efficiently predict using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). A number of researchers have used the time-dependent Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations to compute flows for single and multiple jets in a cross-flow. A few have added some geometric complexity to the problem by computing flows for jet-augmented delta wings near a ground plane. Smith et.al. computed for the first time a single RANS solution about a simplified Harrier. This geometry included a fuselage, wing, leading edge root extension (LERX), inlets, and exhaust nozzles. All of these investigations cite two practical problems with computing these flows: 1) the need for improved solution accuracy; and, 2) the need for faster solution methods. We view the need for faster solution methods as key to improving the solution accuracy and making this class of computation more routine. One can hardly refine grids, explore the use of advanced turbulence models, and generate databases when it takes weeks of dedicated computer time for a single solution. Chaderjian, Ahmad, Pandya, and Murman have focused on reducing the time-to-solution for this very difficult and complex problem through process automation and exploitation of parallel computing. They began with the Harrier geometry reported, and added a deflected wing flap and empennage for greater realism. To date more than 80 solutions have been carried out. This paper will describe this process and progress made in reducing the time required to generate a simple longitudinal force and moment database for a Harrier in ground effect. It shows a typical snap-shot from an unsteady streakline animation, where fluid particles are colored by temperature. The ground vortex and a jet-fountain vortex are highlighted. It also shows a similar streakline image, where HGI occurs due to the vehicle in close proximity to the ground. It is show the mean lift coefficient as a function of angle of attack and height. The angle of attack range was 4 deg less than or = alpha less than or = 10 deg with an increment of 1 degree, and the height range was 10 ft less than or = h less than or = 30ft with an increment of 5 feet. This 35 solution database was extended to over 2500 cases using a monotone cubic-spline interpolation procedure. The suck-down effect (reduction of lift near the ground) is highlighted in the figure. The "cushion effect," the conventional reduction of lift as the vehicle moves out of ground effect, is also indicated. All 35 RANS solutions were obtained using 952 Silicon Graphics Origin 2000 and 3000 processors in dedicated mode for one week. Typically, 112 processors were assigned to each case. Some other cases used fewer processors to utilize all available CPUS. The final paper will report on the automation of the solution process, including: grid generation, job monitoring, solution completion criteria, and post processing. Moreover, improvements in parallel efficiency for a dual time-step algorithm for the RANS equations will also be presented. Results will be discussed in detail using unsteady streakline flow visualization to correlate unsteady flow structures with dominant aerodynamic frequencies. The stability derivatives, CL, and CL, will also be presented.
[1]
William R. Vandalsem,et al.
Numerical simulation of a powered-lift landing
,
1993
.
[2]
Dochan Kwak,et al.
Parametric Study of a YAV-8B Harrier in Ground Effect using Time-Dependent Navier-Stokes Computations
,
2002
.
[3]
W. R. Van Dalsem,et al.
Numerical investigation of a jet in ground effect with a crossflow
,
1987
.
[4]
T. Pulliam,et al.
A diagonal form of an implicit approximate-factorization algorithm
,
1981
.
[5]
Neal M. Chaderjian,et al.
Automation of a Navier-Stokes S&C database generation for the Harrier in ground effect
,
2002
.
[6]
Jorge M. M. Barata.
Numerical and experimental study of fountain flows produced by multijet impingement on a ground plane
,
1991
.
[7]
William R. Van Dalsem,et al.
Numerical simulation of powered-lift flows
,
1990
.
[8]
F. Fritsch,et al.
A Method for Constructing Local Monotone Piecewise Cubic Interpolants
,
1984
.
[9]
Michael Cox,et al.
Application-controlled demand paging for out-of-core visualization
,
1997
.
[10]
T. Pulliam.
Time accuracy and the use of implicit methods. [in CFD
,
1993
.
[11]
James J. McGuirk,et al.
Numerical study of single impinging jets through a crossflow
,
1989
.
[12]
Neal M. Chaderjian,et al.
Parametric Time-Dependent Navier-Stokes Computations for a YAV-8B Harrier in Ground Effect
,
2002
.
[13]
C. Merkle,et al.
Dual time-stepping and preconditioning for unsteady computations
,
1995
.
[14]
William R. Van Dalsem,et al.
Numerical simulation of a complete STOVL aircraft in ground effect
,
1993
.