Enhancing Crowd Wisdom Using Explainable Diversity Inferred from Social Media

A crowd sampled from a set of individuals can provide a more accurate prediction in aggregate than most individuals.This effect, referred to as wisdom of crowd, exists when crowd members bring diverse perspectives to decision making. Such diversity leads to uncorrelated prediction errors that cancel out in aggregate. As crowd members' judgments are often the result of solution strategies, diversity in solution strategies can enhance crowd wisdom. One of the most challenging tasks in sampling such a crowd is to determine the individual's solution strategy for a prediction problem. As participating individuals often share their perspectives through social media, we can use such data to identify an individual's solution strategy. In this paper, we propose a crowd selection approach using social media posts (tweets) indicating diverse solution strategies. We use tweet classification to identify participants' prediction strategies and categorize participants based on the binomial test to identify sets of participants that apply a similar strategy. We then form a diverse crowd by sampling participants from different sets. Using the domain of Fantasy Sports, we show that such a diverse crowd can outperform crowd selected at random and 90% of individual participants, and participant categorization schemes using word2vec. Further, we use a knowledge graph to investigate the factors forming such a diverse crowd and how these factors can lead to a better decision. Relative to bottom-up (data-driven) processes the approach presented here provides an explanation of diverse crowd behavior.

[1]  David V. Budescu,et al.  The Composition of Optimally Wise Crowds , 2015, Decis. Anal..

[2]  R. Preston McAfee,et al.  The wisdom of smaller, smarter crowds , 2014, EC.

[3]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  Intelligent Collective: The Role of Diversity and Collective Cardinality , 2017, ICCCI.

[4]  Lionel P. Robert,et al.  The influence of diversity and experience on the effects of crowd size , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Winston R. Sieck,et al.  The Aggregative Contingent Estimation System: Selecting, Rewarding, and Training Experts in a Wisdom of Crowds Approach to Forecasting , 2012, AAAI Spring Symposium: Wisdom of the Crowd.

[6]  Lu Hong,et al.  Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  A. SalloumSaid,et al.  A survey of text mining in social media facebook and twitter perspectives , 2017 .

[8]  Lionel P. Robert,et al.  Does Collectivism Inhibit Individual Creativity?: The Effects of Collectivism and Perceived Diversity on Individual Creativity and Satisfaction in Virtual Ideation Teams , 2017, CSCW.

[9]  Thomas Demeester,et al.  Representation learning for very short texts using weighted word embedding aggregation , 2016, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[10]  Mark Dredze,et al.  Measuring Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in Twitter , 2014, ICWSM.

[11]  Jason Weston,et al.  Learning End-to-End Goal-Oriented Dialog , 2016, ICLR.

[12]  Zhen Liu,et al.  A new feature selection algorithm based on binomial hypothesis testing for spam filtering , 2011, Knowl. Based Syst..

[13]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data , 2007, ISWC/ASWC.

[14]  Gang Wang,et al.  Crowd Wisdom: The Impact of Opinion Diversity and Participant Independence on Crowd Performance , 2016, AMCIS.

[15]  Daniel M. Romero,et al.  Crowd Size, Diversity and Performance , 2015, CHI.

[16]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[17]  David V. Budescu,et al.  When is a crowd wise? , 2014, ArXiv.

[18]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  The social psychology of the wisdom of crowds. , 2012 .

[19]  Russ B. Altman,et al.  Improving the explainability of Random Forest classifier - user centered approach , 2018, PSB.

[20]  John Usen,et al.  The Generalized Die Binomial Experiment , 2016 .

[21]  Henrik Olsson,et al.  A Comparison of Small Crowd Selection Methods , 2015, CogSci.

[22]  J. Davitz,et al.  A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920-1957. , 1958, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Enhancing crowd wisdom using measures of diversity computed from social media data , 2017, WI.

[24]  Tomohiro Shirakawa,et al.  Play style classification of the strong mahjong players , 2015 .

[25]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  User Interests Identification on Twitter Using a Hierarchical Knowledge Base , 2014, ESWC.

[26]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Harnessing relationships for domain-specific subgraph extraction: A recommendation use case , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).