The relationship between methodological trial quality and the effects of impregnated central venous catheters

[1]  F. V. van Tiel,et al.  Relationship between methodological trial quality and the effects of selective digestive decontamination on pneumonia and mortality in critically ill patients. , 2001, JAMA.

[2]  P. Hsueh,et al.  Evaluation of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for prevention of catheter-related infection in intensive care unit patients. , 2000, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[3]  J. Skurnick,et al.  Prevention of nosocomial bloodstream infections: Effectiveness of antimicrobial-impregnated and heparin-bonded central venous catheters , 2000, Critical care medicine.

[4]  D. König,et al.  Measurement of ultrasonic-induced chlorhexidine liberation: correlation of the activity of chlorhexidine-silver-sulfadiazine-impregnated catheters to agar roll technique and broth culture. , 2000, The Journal of hospital infection.

[5]  T. Stewart,et al.  Anti-microbial or antiseptic impregnated central venous catheters: update on a “central” debate , 2000, Intensive Care Medicine.

[6]  Hannan,et al.  Antiseptic‐bonded central venous catheters and bacterial colonisation , 1999, Anaesthesia.

[7]  S. Saint,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection. , 1999, JAMA.

[8]  D. Paterson,et al.  Antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. , 1999 .

[9]  G. Collin.  Clinical Investigations in Critical CareDecreasing Catheter Colonization Through the Use of an Antiseptic-Impregnated Catheter: A Continuous Quality Improvement Project , 1999 .

[10]  T. Lumley,et al.  Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis. , 1999, JAMA.

[11]  W. D’hoore,et al.  A meta-analysis dealing with the effectiveness of chlorhexidine and silver-sufhadiazine impregnated central venous catheters. , 1998, The Journal of hospital infection.

[12]  J. Puyana,et al.  Influence of triple-lumen central venous catheters coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  M. Lieser,et al.  A prospective randomized trial of an antibiotic- and antiseptic-coated central venous catheter in the prevention of catheter-related infections. , 1997, Archives of surgery.

[14]  W. D’hoore,et al.  Evaluation of chlorhexidine and silver-sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of bloodstream infection in leukaemic patients: a randomized controlled trial. , 1997, The Journal of hospital infection.

[15]  L. Mermel,et al.  Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection by Use of an Antiseptic-Impregnated Catheter , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  P. Vuddamalay,et al.  Antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters reduce the incidence of bacterial colonization and associated infection in immunocompromised transplant patients. , 1997, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[17]  P. Cuddy,et al.  No difference in catheter sepsis between standard and antiseptic central venous catheters. A prospective randomized trial. , 1996, Archives of surgery.

[18]  P. Volkers,et al.  Failure of antiseptic bonding to prevent central venous catheter-related infection and sepsis. , 1996, The American surgeon.

[19]  P. V. van Heerden,et al.  Central Venous Catheters Revisited— Infection Rates and an Assessment of the New Fibrin Analysing System Brush , 1996, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[20]  J. Mcmahon,et al.  Impact of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters on in vitro quantitation of catheter-associated bacteria , 1996, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[21]  E. Martin,et al.  Retention of antibacterial activity and bacterial colonization of antiseptic-bonded central venous catheters. , 1996, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[22]  克也 平山,et al.  A prospective randomized trial , 1995 .

[23]  P. Reiser,et al.  EXAMINATION OF ANTIMICROBIAL COATED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS IN PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK FOR CATHETER RELATED INFECTIONS IN A MEDICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT AND LEUKEMIA/BONE MARROW TRANSPLANT UNIT , 1995 .

[24]  E. Martin,et al.  Prevention of bacterial colonization of intravenous catheters by antiseptic impregnation of polyurethane polymers. , 1994, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[25]  D. Maki,et al.  A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  G. Schutze.  Antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. , 2002, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[27]  J. Ramsay,et al.  Incidence of catheter colonization and catheter related infection with an antiseptic impregnated triple lumen catheter , 1994 .