Using distance matrices to choose between competing theories and an application to the origin of modern humans.

This paper examines competing theories for cases in which both the data and the hypotheses can be represented as distance matrices. A test due to Dow & Cheverud has been used for such comparisons in anthropology, but when data are spatially, temporally, or phylogenetically autocorrelated, this test may be far too liberal. We examine a classification procedure based on ratios of probabilities obtained from Mantel tests of the competing hypotheses and find that design matrices describing only lag-one connections and those eliminating common connections of competing hypotheses are the most informative. We apply this method to simulated gene-frequency data in a 7 x 7 chessboard representing a stepping-stone model and discriminate between alternative theories with a 7% misclassification rate. We also apply these techniques to the current controversy concerning the origin of anatomically modern humans by testing design matrices representing regional continuity and single African origins. The outcome for lag-one matrices and those showing only unique lag-one differences indicate that the single African origin of anatomically modern humans fits the distance matrix based on 165 characters of 83 fossil crania better than the competing theory. However, we also tested a design matrix describing single origin out of southwest Asia. This design matrix was clearly most similar to the data in all tested cases. These results make the regional-continuity theory a less likely explanation for the observed cranial differences than the two single-origin theories. Of these, single southwest Asian origins seems the more likely interpretation of the data.

[1]  N. Mantel.  The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.

[2]  M. Gimbutas.  Old Europe c. 7000-3500 B.C.: The Earliest European Civilization before the Infiltration of the Indo-European Peoples. , 1973 .

[3]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  On testing equality of related correlation coefficients , 1976 .

[4]  Kenneth J. Berry,et al.  Multi-response permutation procedures for a priori classifications , 1976 .

[5]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  A Distribution-Free Test for Related Correlation Coefficients , 1977 .

[6]  P. Mielke,et al.  Clarification and Appropriate Inferences for Mantel and Valand's Nonparametric Multivariate Analysis Technique , 1978 .

[7]  Paul W. Mielke,et al.  On asymptotic non-normality of null distributions of mrpp statistics , 1979 .

[8]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  Testing Statistical Significance of Geographic Variation Patterns , 1979 .

[9]  M. Gimbutas.  The Three Waves of the Kurgan People into Old Europe, 4500-2500 B.C. in Anthropologie et Archéologie: le cas des premiers âges des Métaux. Actes du Symposium de Sils-Maria, 25-30 septembre 1978. , 1979 .

[10]  Lawrence Hubert,et al.  Inference Procedures for the Evaluation and Comparison of Proximity Matrices , 1983 .

[11]  M M Dow,et al.  Comparison of distance matrices in studies of population structure and genetic microdifferentiation: quadratic assignment. , 1985, American journal of physical anthropology.

[12]  R. Sokal,et al.  Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence , 1986 .

[13]  Colin Renfrew,et al.  Archaeology and language , 1987 .

[14]  C. Stringer,et al.  Genetic and fossil evidence for the origin of modern humans. , 1988, Science.

[15]  J. Relethford.  Effects of English admixture and geographic distance on anthropometric variation and genetic structure in 19th-century Ireland. , 1988, American journal of physical anthropology.

[16]  C. Stringer,et al.  In reply: modern human origins. , 1988, Science.

[17]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Subspecific morphological variation in the saddle‐back tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis) , 1990, American journal of primatology.

[18]  M. Slatkin,et al.  Spatial Autocorrelation Methods in Population Genetics , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[19]  P. Mellars,et al.  The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans , 1991 .

[20]  M. Wolpoff.  Theories of modern human origins , 1992 .

[21]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  An investigation of three-matrix permutation tests , 1992 .

[22]  N. Oden.  Spatial autocorrelation invalidates the Dow‐Cheverud test , 1992 .

[23]  Jeffrey C. Long,et al.  Matrix correlation analysis in anthropology and genetics , 1992 .

[24]  D. Tab Rasmussen,et al.  The Origin and Evolution of Humans and Humanness. , 1993 .

[25]  D. Waddle.  Matrix correlation tests support a single origin for modern humans , 1994, Nature.

[26]  J. Relethford,et al.  Modern human origins , 1994, Nature.

[27]  D. Waddle.  Modern human origins , 1994, Nature.

[28]  R. Sokal,et al.  A simulation study of microevolutionary inferences by spatial autocorrelation analysis , 1997 .

[29]  I. H. Öğüş,et al.  NATO ASI Series , 1997 .