Analysis of heart rate and heart rate variation during cardiac CT examinations.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES We sought to examine heart rate and heart rate variability during cardiac computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety patients (59.0 +/- 13.5 years) underwent coronary CT angiography (CTA), with 52 patients also undergoing coronary artery calcium scanning (CAC). Forty-two patients with heart rate greater than 70 bpm were pretreated with oral beta-blockers (in five patients, use of beta-blocker was not known). Sixty-four patients were given sublingual nitroglycerin. Mean heart rate and percentage of beats outside a +/-5 bpm region about the mean were compared between baseline (free breathing), prescan hyperventilation, and scan acquisition (breath-hold). RESULTS Mean scan acquisition time was 13.1 +/- 1.5 seconds for CAC scanning and 14.2 +/- 2.9 seconds for coronary CTA. Mean heart rate during scan acquisition was significantly lower than at baseline (CAC 58.2 +/- 8.5 bpm; CTA 59.2 +/- 8.8 bpm; baseline 62.8 +/- 8.9 bpm; P < .001). The percentage of beats outside a +/-5 bpm about the mean were not different between baseline and CTA scanning (3.5% versus 3.3%, P = .87). The injection of contrast had no significant effect on heart rate (58.2 bpm versus 59.2 bpm, P = .24) or percentage of beats outside a +/-5 bpm about the mean (3.0% versus 3.3%, P = .64). No significant difference was found between gender and age groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS Breath-holding during cardiac CT scan acquisition significantly lowers the mean heart rate by approximately 4 bpm, but heart rate variability is the same or less compared with normal breathing.

[1]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[2]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  B. Lu,et al.  Baseline heart rate-adjusted electrocardiographic triggering for coronary artery electron-beam CT angiography. , 2004, Radiology.

[4]  S. K. Hong,et al.  Mechanism of apneic bradycardia in man. , 1969, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  M. Budoff,et al.  Coronary Artery Motion During the Cardiac Cycle and Optimal ECG Triggering for Coronary Artery Imaging , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[6]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. , 2005, Medical physics.

[7]  Massimo Midiri,et al.  Improving diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in patients with mild heart rhythm irregularities using ECG editing. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Jonathan S. Lewin,et al.  Functional Cardiac CT and MR: Effects of Heart Rate and Software Applications on Measurement Validity , 2005, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[9]  M F Reiser,et al.  ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. , 2001, Radiology.

[10]  Michael Grass,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. , 2005, Radiology.