A vehicle-by-vehicle approach to assess the impact of variable message signs on driving behavior

Abstract Variable Message Signs (VMS) provide real-time information on traffic conditions, making it possible to guide drivers through electronic signs along the road. Relevant literature has proved VMS to be effective, especially for diverting traffic during incidents in the highway or inducing a speed reduction. Previous efforts, however, usually involve off-highway experiences, including the use of simulators or stated preference surveys, or the measurement of aggregate values of traffic through technologies that are prone to a higher failure rate, such as loop detectors. For bridging this gap, in this research, we propose a novel vehicle-by-vehicle approach (VBV), that differentiate by vehicle type, to assess the impact of VMS on drivers’ road behavior patterns along a section of a Chilean urban highway during risky situations. In addition to the messaging information, we use full traffic data obtained from free-flow gates equipped with automatic vehicle identification (AVI) technology. We conduct statistical analyses to study two potential messaging-induced behavioral changes, namely speed reduction and lane changes. For the speed reduction behavior, in 87.50% of the studied messages, the results indicate that the messages failed to induce the desired change in behavior. This value decreases to 71.85% for lane changes. The results indicate that heavy vehicle drivers and low-mileage drivers are more likely to follow lane change messages.

[1]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  Nick Hounsell,et al.  Driver response to variable message sign information in London , 2002 .

[3]  Natasha Merat,et al.  The Effectiveness of Safety Campaign VMS Messages - A Driving Simulator Investigation , 2017 .

[4]  Mike McDonald,et al.  Investigating Limits of Benefits Provided by Variable Message Signs in Urban Network , 2007 .

[5]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Characteristics of rear-end accidents at signalized intersections using multiple logistic regression model. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Brien G. Benson Motorist Attitudes about Content of Variable-Message Signs , 1996 .

[7]  Si-Yuan Kong Driver Response to Variable Message Signs in a 2D Multiplayer Real-time Driving Simulator , 2018 .

[8]  Francisco Bravo,et al.  Real-time crash prediction in an urban expressway using disaggregated data , 2018 .

[9]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Commuters' enroute diversion and return decisions: Analysis and implications for advanced traveler information systems , 1993 .

[10]  William H. K. Lam,et al.  A model for assessing the effects of dynamic travel time information via variable message signs , 2001 .

[11]  I J Wouters,et al.  Traffic accident reduction by monitoring driver behaviour with in-car data recorders. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  Effects of route guidance variable message signs (VMS) on driver behaviour , 2007 .

[13]  Jiajun Shen,et al.  Effects of urban road variable message signs on driving behavior , 2019, Advances in Mechanical Engineering.

[14]  Juan Gomez,et al.  The influence of variable message signs on en-route diversion between a toll highway and a free competing alternative , 2019 .

[15]  Fang He,et al.  Optimal locations and travel time display for variable message signs , 2016 .

[16]  Risto Kulmala,et al.  Effects of variable message signs for slippery road conditions on driving speed and headways , 2000 .

[17]  Winnie Daamen,et al.  Route choice behaviour and travel information in a congested network: Static and dynamic recursive models , 2020, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[18]  J. W. C. van Lint,et al.  Deriving on-trip route choices of truck drivers by utilizing Bluetooth data, loop detector data and variable message sign data , 2019, 2019 6th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[19]  Xuedong Yan,et al.  Effectiveness of variable message signs on driving behavior based on a driving simulation experiment , 2014 .

[20]  Peter Bonsall,et al.  Driver response to variable message signs: a stated preference investigation , 1997 .

[21]  Lijun Sun,et al.  Empirical Analysis and Modeling of Drivers’ Response to Variable Message Signs in Shanghai, China , 2011 .

[22]  Jaeyoung Lee,et al.  Analyzing drivers’ preferences and choices for the content and format of variable message signs (VMS) , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[23]  David M Levinson,et al.  Effectiveness of Variable Message Signs Using Empirical Loop Detector Data , 2003 .

[24]  Peter Chapman,et al.  VISUAL SEARCH PATTERNS IN TRAINED AND UNTRAINED NOVICE DRIVERS , 2002 .

[25]  Brian L. Smith,et al.  Comparison of In-Vehicle Auditory Public Traffic Information With Roadside Dynamic Message Signs , 2016, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[26]  Donald L. Fisher,et al.  Use of a driving simulator to evaluate and optimize factors affecting understandability of variable message signs , 2004 .

[27]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Quantifying the Number of Lane Changes in Traffic , 2012 .

[28]  Franco Basso,et al.  The importance of flow composition in real-time crash prediction. , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Jorge Ramos,et al.  Content of Variable Message Signs and On-Line Driver Behavior , 2000 .

[30]  Dick de Waard,et al.  Don’t shoot the messenger: Traffic-irrelevant messages on variable message signs (VMSs) might not interfere with traffic management , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[31]  S. Charlton,et al.  Inattentional blindness and information relevance of variable message signs. , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  Hong Huo,et al.  Effectiveness of Variable Message Signs , 2003 .

[33]  Constantinos Antoniou,et al.  Parameters Affecting Professional Driver Response to VMS Messages , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.