A Bayesian method to estimate the depth and the range of phonating sperm whales using a single hydrophone.

Some bioacousticians have used a single hydrophone to calculate the depth/range of phonating diving animals. The standard one-hydrophone localization method uses multipath transmissions (direct path, sea surface, and seafloor reflections) of the animal phonations as a substitute for a vertical hydrophone array. The standard method requires three multipath transmissions per phonation. Bioacousticians who study foraging sperm whales usually do not have the required amount of multipath transmissions. However, they usually detect accurately (using shallow hydrophones towed by research vessels) direct path transmissions and sea surface reflections of sperm whale phonations (clicks). Sperm whales emit a few thousand clicks per foraging dive, therefore researchers have this number of direct path transmissions and this number of sea surface reflections per dive. The author describes a Bayesian method to combine the information contained in those acoustic data plus visual observations. The author's tests using synthetic data show that the accurate estimation of the depth/range of sperm whales is possible using a single hydrophone and without using any seafloor reflections. This method could be used to study the behavior of sperm whales using a single hydrophone in any location no matter what the depth, the relief, or the constitution of the seafloor might be.

[1]  Walter M. X. Zimmer,et al.  Combining data from a multisensor tag and passive sonar to determine the diving behavior of a sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) , 2003 .

[2]  Aaron Thode,et al.  Tracking sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) dive profiles using a towed passive acoustic array. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Victoria O'Connell,et al.  Three-dimensional localization of sperm whales using a single hydrophone. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[5]  P. Pérez,et al.  Markov random fields and images , 1998 .

[6]  Hal Whitehead,et al.  Click rates from sperm whales , 1990 .

[7]  Christophe Laplanche,et al.  Male sperm whale acoustic behavior observed from multipaths at a single hydrophone. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  A. Thode,et al.  Depth-dependent acoustic features of diving sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) in the Gulf of Mexico. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J. Tougaard,et al.  Echolocation signals of wild harbour porpoises, Phocoena phocoena , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  Peter L Tyack,et al.  Swimming gaits, passive drag and buoyancy of diving sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11]  John L Spiesberger,et al.  Probability distributions for locations of calling animals, receivers, sound speeds, winds, and data from travel time differences. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. Spiesberger Hyperbolic location errors due to insufficient numbers of receivers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  P. Madsen,et al.  Estimating source position accuracy of a large-aperture hydrophone array for bioacoustics , 2001 .

[14]  L. Miller,et al.  Sperm whale clicks: directionality and source level revisited. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Mark P. Johnson,et al.  Sperm whale behaviour indicates the use of echolocation click buzzes ‘creaks’ in prey capture , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  William A. Watkins,et al.  Sound source location by arrival-times on a non-rigid three-dimensional hydrophone array , 1972 .

[17]  P. Madsen,et al.  The monopulsed nature of sperm whale clicks. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.