A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
暂无分享,去创建一个
C. E. Peishoff | G. Warren | C. W. Andrews | A. Capelli | Brian Clarke | Judith M. LaLonde | M. Lambert | M. Lindvall | Neysa Nevins | S. Semus | S. Senger | G. Tedesco | I. Wall | James M. Woolven | M. Head | Ian D. Wall
[1] J M Blaney,et al. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.
[2] Conrad C. Huang,et al. The MIDAS display system , 1988 .
[3] I. Kuntz. Structure-Based Strategies for Drug Design and Discovery , 1992, Science.
[4] I. Kuntz,et al. Structure-Based Molecular Design , 1994 .
[5] Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[6] David B. Fogel,et al. Docking Conformationally Flexible Small Molecules into a Protein Binding Site through Evolutionary Programming , 1995, Evolutionary Programming.
[7] Gennady M Verkhivker,et al. Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 protease: conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.
[8] T. Halgren,et al. A priori prediction of activity for HIV-1 protease inhibitors employing energy minimization in the active site. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[9] Thomas Lengauer,et al. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[10] Todd J. A. Ewing,et al. Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database screening , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..
[11] G. V. Paolini,et al. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[12] P Willett,et al. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[13] Y. Martin,et al. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[14] J. Richardson,et al. Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[15] Todd J. A. Ewing,et al. DREAM++: Flexible docking program for virtual combinatorial libraries , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[16] T Lengauer,et al. The particle concept: placing discrete water molecules during protein‐ligand docking predictions , 1999, Proteins.
[17] R M Knegtel,et al. Efficacy and selectivity in flexible database docking , 1999, Proteins.
[18] D. Rognan,et al. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[19] J. Madura,et al. Docking of sulfonamides to carbonic anhydrase II and IV. , 2000, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[20] Ingo Muegge,et al. Evaluation of docking/scoring approaches: A comparative study based on MMP3 inhibitors , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[21] Protein-Ligand Interactions,et al. Knowledge-based Scoring Function to Predict , 2000 .
[22] A. Ortiz,et al. Evaluation of docking functions for protein-ligand docking. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[23] F. Jørgensen,et al. A new concept for multidimensional selection of ligand conformations (MultiSelect) and multidimensional scoring (MultiScore) of protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[24] Luhua Lai,et al. Protein ligand docking based on empirical method for binding affinity estimation , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[25] M Rarey,et al. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[26] J. Risler,et al. How methionyl-tRNA synthetase creates its amino acid recognition pocket upon L-methionine binding. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[27] T. Willson,et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: from genes to physiology. , 2001, Recent progress in hormone research.
[28] Todd J. A. Ewing,et al. DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[29] B. Shoichet,et al. Molecular docking and high-throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[30] T. Hunter,et al. The Protein Kinase Complement of the Human Genome , 2002, Science.
[31] P. Sampson,et al. Methionine in and out of proteins: targets for drug design. , 2002, Current medicinal chemistry.
[32] Luhua Lai,et al. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[33] G. Klebe,et al. Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors. , 2002, Angewandte Chemie.
[34] Jeremy L Jenkins,et al. Virtual screening to enrich hit lists from high‐throughput screening: A case study on small‐molecule inhibitors of angiogenin , 2002, Proteins.
[35] D. Diller,et al. Kinases, homology models, and high throughput docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[36] Martin Stahl,et al. Binding site characteristics in structure-based virtual screening: evaluation of current docking tools , 2003, Journal of molecular modeling.
[37] Ruben Abagyan,et al. Discovery of diverse thyroid hormone receptor antagonists by high-throughput docking , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[38] Renxiao Wang,et al. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[39] Meitian Wang,et al. Non-nucleoside Analogue Inhibitors Bind to an Allosteric Site on HCV NS5B Polymerase , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[40] P. Charifson,et al. Active-Site Residues of Escherichia coli DNA Gyrase Required in Coupling ATP Hydrolysis to DNA Supercoiling and Amino Acid Substitutions Leading to Novobiocin Resistance , 2003, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
[41] J. Smallheer,et al. The race to an orally active Factor Xa inhibitor: recent advances. , 2004, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[42] Jiri Bartek,et al. Targeting the checkpoint kinases: chemosensitization versus chemoprotection , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.
[43] Hege S. Beard,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[44] Maria Kontoyianni,et al. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[45] D. J. Price,et al. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[46] Lars Hemmingsen,et al. Docking and scoring of metallo-β-lactamases inhibitors , 2004, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[47] W Patrick Walters,et al. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance , 2004, Proteins.
[48] Anna Vulpetti,et al. Assessment of Docking Poses: Interactions-Based Accuracy Classification (IBAC) versus Crystal Structure Deviations. , 2004 .
[49] Shaomeng Wang,et al. An Extensive Test of 14 Scoring Functions Using the PDBbind Refined Set of 800 Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[50] Matthew P. Repasky,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[51] Didier Rognan,et al. Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy , 2004, Proteins.
[52] Maria Kontoyianni,et al. Evaluation of library ranking efficacy in virtual screening , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..