Air quality monitoring network design to control nitrogen dioxide and ozone, applied in Malaga, Spain

Abstract Air monitoring networks are necessary to assess air quality in order to reduce pollution to levels which minimize harmful effects on human health and the environment. This paper describes a method to design or optimize air quality monitoring networks for nitrogen dioxide and ozone and its application in Malaga, a medium large city located in Andalusia, southern Spain, with traffic being the main source of air pollution. The completion of this method revealed that the old assessment network in Malaga was badly designed and made it possible to determine that one traffic-orientated and one background control station were necessary for NO2 assessment in Malaga, as well as two control stations for O3. First the number of stations necessary is obtained from historical data. Sampling campaigns with passive diffusion samplers at 74 sites were then carried out to obtain information on the pollution distribution in Malaga. The average concentrations found for NO2 and O3 were 22.8 μg/m3 and 64.3 μg/m3 respectively. Maximum values of up to 42.2 μg/m3 NO2 were found in Malaga city centre and O3 reached 91.5 μg/m3 downwind from the emission source. After spatial interpolation of the obtained values with Geographical Information Systems, a selection of the best locations for the monitoring stations was made, in line with the macro- and microscale siting requirements of the European Directive 2008/50/EC on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe.

[1]  M. Ferm,et al.  Cost-efficient techniques for urban- and background measurements of SO2 and NO2 , 1998 .

[2]  S. Smith,et al.  Measurement of Ozone Concentrations in Ambient Air Using a Badge-Type Passive Monitor , 1997 .

[3]  P. Koutrakis,et al.  Measurement of ambient ozone using a nitrite-coated filter , 1993 .

[4]  P. Koutrakis,et al.  Assessment of Ozone Exposures in the Greater Metropolitan Toronto Area. , 1995, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[5]  Hiep Duc,et al.  Spatial distribution characteristics of some air pollutants in Sydney , 2000 .

[6]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[7]  S. Morimoto,et al.  Ozone monitoring in the polar troposphere using a new diffusive sampler , 2003 .

[8]  H. Dop,et al.  Photochemical production of ozone in Western Europe (1971–1975) and its relation to meteorology , 1977 .

[9]  E. Palmes,et al.  Personal sampler for nitrogen dioxide. , 1976, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[10]  J. Stedman,et al.  A survey of nitrogen dioxide concentrations in the United Kingdom using diffusion tubes, July-December 1991 , 1994 .

[11]  K. Spokas,et al.  Implications of the spatial variability of landfill emission rates on geospatial analyses. , 2003, Waste management.

[12]  D. Atkins The measurement of nitrogen dioxide in the outdoor environment using passive diffusion tube samplers , 1986 .

[13]  S. Krupa,et al.  Passive sampling of ambient, gaseous air pollutants: an assessment from an ecological perspective. , 2000, Environmental pollution.

[14]  E. Palmes,et al.  Personal monitoring device for gaseous contaminants. , 1973, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[15]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Ozone pollution and ozone biomonitoring in European cities. Part I: Ozone concentrations and cumulative exposure indices at urban and suburban sites , 2006 .

[16]  D. Perkauskas,et al.  Evaluation of SO2 and NO2 concentration levels in Vilnius (Lithuania) using passive diffusion samplers , 1999 .