Paediatric and adult computed tomography practice and patient dose in Australia.

The current practice for CT scanning of paediatric patients in Australia has been assessed through a survey sent to the site of all CT scanners licensed in New South Wales and all dedicated children's hospitals in Australia. The survey addressed demographic details, CT scanner details and scanning parameters for four imaging scenarios (brain CT, chest CT, abdomen/pelvis CT and high-resolution chest CT for three different age groups (8 weeks, 5-7 years and adult patients). The effective dose for each imaging scenario and age group was calculated and compared for 52 sites representing 53 CT scanners. For any age group and imaging scenario, there was a large spread of effective dose. For comparable CT examinations, the effective dose varied by up to 36-fold between centres. There was a clear trend for centres that frequently carry out CT scans on paediatric patients to have the lowest radiation doses. Four age group/imaging scenarios showed significantly lower effective doses for hospital-based CT than for nonhospital sites. There was also a trend for doses to be lower at dedicated paediatric centres. Effective dose was closely associated with mAs, with most centres using lower mAs for younger patients, but few centres reduced the kVp for paediatric patients. The results of the survey emphasize the need for continuing education and protocol review, particularly in paediatric CT examinations, in a complex and fast changing environment.

[1]  J. K. Smith,et al.  Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. , 1998, Radiology.

[2]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimates of the cancer risks from pediatric CT radiation are not merely theoretical: comment on "point/counterpoint: in x-ray computed tomography, technique factors should be selected appropriate to patient size. against the proposition". , 2001, Medical physics.

[3]  W Huda,et al.  An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients. , 1997, Radiology.

[4]  D. McLean,et al.  Survey of effective dose levels from typical paediatric CT protocols. , 2003, Australasian radiology.

[5]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  D. Frush,et al.  Helical CT of the body: a survey of techniques used for pediatric patients. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  M. Osteaux,et al.  CT doses in children: a multicentre study. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  W A Kalender,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. , 1999, Medical physics.

[9]  E. Hall,et al.  Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[10]  Donald P Frush,et al.  Improved pediatric multidetector body CT using a size-based color-coded format. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  T. Slovis,et al.  Children, computed tomography radiation dose, and the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) concept. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[12]  M Mahesh,et al.  Dose and pitch relationship for a particular multislice CT scanner. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  D. McLean.  Computed tomography doses in children , 2004, The Lancet.

[14]  M. Galanski,et al.  Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey , 2003, European Radiology.

[15]  K Faulkner,et al.  Radiation Dose and Somatic Risk from Computed Tomography , 1987, Acta radiologica.

[16]  C L Chapple,et al.  Effective dose in paediatric computed tomography. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Maria Zankl,et al.  Organ Doses for Children from Computed Tomographic Examinations , 1995 .

[18]  John M Boone,et al.  Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. , 2003, Radiology.

[19]  W Huda,et al.  Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. , 1999, Radiology.

[20]  W Huda,et al.  Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. , 2000, Radiology.

[21]  S. Edyvean,et al.  CT scanner dosimetry. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  Claus D. Claussen,et al.  Multidetector helical CT of the liver for tumor detection and characterization , 2002, European Radiology.

[23]  G. Enríquez,et al.  Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  J C Le Heron,et al.  Estimation of effective dose to the patient during medical x-ray examinations from measurements of the dose-area product. , 1992 .

[25]  C A Kelsey,et al.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[26]  Donald P Frush,et al.  Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[27]  A S Brody,et al.  Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  D. Frush,et al.  Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.