Decaying Singular Vectors and Their Impact on Analysis and Forecast Correction

The full set of kinetic energy singular values and singular vectors for the forward tangent propagator of a quasigeostrophic potential vorticity model is examined. In contrast to the fastest growing singular vectors, the fastest decaying vectors exhibit a downward and downscale transfer of energy and an eastward tilt with height. The near-neutral singular vectors resemble small-scale noise with no localized structure or coherence between levels. Post-time forecast and analysis correction techniques are examined as a function of the number of singular vectors included in the representation of the inverse of the forward tangent propagator. It is found that for the case when the forecast error is known exactly, the best corrections are obtained when using the full inverse, which includes all of the singular vectors. It is also found that the erroneous projection of the analysis uncertainty onto the fastest decaying singular vectors has a significant detrimental effect on the estimation of analysis error. Therefore, for the more realistic case where the forecast error is known imperfectly, use of the full inverse will result in an inaccurate estimate of analysis errors, and the best corrections are obtained when using an inverse composed only of the growing singular vectors. Running the tangent equations with a negative time step is a very good approximation to using the full inverse of the forward tangent propagator.

[1]  Dennis L. Hartmann,et al.  Barotropic Instability and Optimal Perturbations of Observed Nonzonal Flows , 1992 .

[2]  Milija Zupanski,et al.  Regional Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation in a Quasi-Operational Forecasting Environment , 1993 .

[3]  Ricardo Todling,et al.  A fixed-lag Kalman smoother for retrospective data assimilation , 1994 .

[4]  J. Barkmeijer,et al.  Validation of a skill prediction method , 1993 .

[5]  R. Gelaro,et al.  Estimation of key analysis errors using the adjoint technique , 1998 .

[6]  Brian F. Farrell,et al.  Small Error Dynamics and the Predictability of Atmospheric Flows. , 1990 .

[7]  T. Palmer,et al.  Singular Vectors, Metrics, and Adaptive Observations. , 1998 .

[8]  J. Barkmeijer.  Local error growth in a barotropic model , 1992 .

[9]  Philippe Courtier,et al.  Sensitivity of forecast errors to initial conditions , 1996 .

[10]  Philippe Courtier,et al.  Dynamical structure functions in a four‐dimensional variational assimilation: A case study , 1996 .

[11]  T. Petroliagis,et al.  Error growth and estimates of predictability from the ECMWF forecasting system , 1995 .

[12]  Roger Daley,et al.  The application of Kalman smoother theory to the estimation of 4DVAR error statistics , 1996 .

[13]  Philippe Courtier,et al.  Use of cloud‐cleared radiances in three/four‐dimensional variational data assimilation , 1994 .

[14]  Martin Ehrendorfer,et al.  Optimal Prediction of Forecast Error Covariances through Singular Vectors , 1997 .

[15]  R. Buizza.  Localization of optimal perturbations using a projection operator , 1994 .

[16]  Franco Molteni,et al.  Toward a dynamical understanding of planetary-scale flow regimes. , 1993 .

[17]  Ronald M. Errico,et al.  Mesoscale Predictability and the Spectrum of Optimal Perturbations , 1995 .

[18]  Tim N. Palmer,et al.  Extended-range predictions with ecmwf models: Interannual variability in operational model integrations , 1990 .

[19]  Roberto Buizza,et al.  The impact of increased resolution on predictability studies with singular vectors , 1997 .

[20]  Roberto Buizza,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Forecast Errors and the Construction of Optimal Perturbations Using Singular Vectors , 1998 .

[21]  Franco Molteni,et al.  Ensemble prediction using dynamically conditioned perturbations , 1993 .

[22]  Philippe Courtier,et al.  A comparison between four-dimensional variational assimilation and simplified sequential assimilation relying on three-dimensional variational analysis , 1993 .

[23]  Eugenia Kalnay,et al.  Ensemble Forecasting at NMC: The Generation of Perturbations , 1993 .

[24]  E. Lorenz.  A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model , 1965 .

[25]  Olivier Talagrand,et al.  On extending the limits of variational assimilation in nonlinear chaotic systems , 1996 .

[26]  J. Barkmeijer,et al.  Singular vectors and estimates of the analysis‐error covariance metric , 1998 .

[27]  J. Derber.  Variational Four-dimensional Analysis Using Quasi-Geostrophic Constraints , 1987 .

[28]  M. Newman,et al.  Free Barotropic Rossby Wave Dynamics of the Wintertime Low-Frequency Flow , 1997 .

[29]  Roberto Buizza,et al.  Computation of optimal unstable structures for a numerical weather prediction model , 1993 .

[30]  Franco Molteni,et al.  Predictability and finite‐time instability of the northern winter circulation , 1993 .

[31]  Istvan Szunyogh,et al.  Sensitivity of Forecast Errors to Initial Conditions with a Quasi-Inverse Linear Method , 1997 .

[32]  Peter J. Webster,et al.  Random error growth in NMC's global forecasts , 1994 .

[33]  F. Molteni,et al.  The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System: Methodology and validation , 1996 .