An ethnographic examination of the relationship of gender & end-user programming

My dissertation ethnographically investigates gendered patterns of use in domestic programming. I study the home as it is a critical environment in which we socialize children in socially approved attitudes towards gender and technology. I argue there is a masculine bias in usability and design processes. I examine the problematic relationship between femininity and technical mastery, in that it is a source of Gender Inauthencity for women who wish to participate in technology. My work seeks to understand this tension. I outline gendered usage patterns in everyday use of domestic technology. I draw from anthropology, gender studies, STS, design research, ubiquitous computing, and social informatics. In conducting this work I reframe the discussion of the role of gender in technology from something that merely needs to be controlled for, to something with inherent power imbalances that is socially constructed, which organizes everyday life. I argue technology is an object around which individuals negotiate their Gender and Technical Identities.

[1]  S. Turkle,et al.  Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture , 1990, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[2]  Barry Brumitt,et al.  EasyLiving: Technologies for Intelligent Environments , 2000, HUC.

[3]  Bill Curtis,et al.  Applying Discount Usability Engineering , 1995, IEEE Softw..

[4]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  The fuzzy felt ethnography—understanding the programming patterns of domestic appliances , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[5]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Implications for design , 2006, CHI.

[6]  Elaine Lally,et al.  At Home With Computers , 2020 .

[7]  Margaret M. Burnett,et al.  Tinkering and gender in end-user programmers' debugging , 2006, CHI.

[8]  Myfanwy Franks.  Feminisms and Cross-ideological Feminist Social Research: Standpoint, Situatedness and Positionality – Developing Cross-ideological Feminist Research , 2002 .

[9]  C. Egido,et al.  Pictures and category labels as navigational aids for catalog browsing , 1988, CHI '88.

[10]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  AutoHAN: an architecture for programming the home , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Symposia on Human-Centric Computing Languages and Environments (Cat. No.01TH8587).

[11]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  CAMP: A Magnetic Poetry Interface for End-User Programming of Capture Applications for the Home , 2004, UbiComp.

[12]  R. Jowell,et al.  British Social Attitudes: The 7th Report , 1991 .

[13]  Kent Larson,et al.  A living laboratory for the design and evaluation of ubiquitous computing technologies , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  Rosalind Gill,et al.  The Gender-Technology Relation , 2018 .

[15]  Cynthia Cockburn,et al.  Machinery of dominance , 1987 .

[16]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  First steps in programming: a rationale for attention investment models , 2002, Proceedings IEEE 2002 Symposia on Human Centric Computing Languages and Environments.

[17]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  The Aware Home: A Living Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research , 1999, CoBuild.

[18]  Elin Kvande,et al.  `In the Belly of the Beast' , 1999 .

[19]  S. Harding.  The science question in feminism , 1986 .

[20]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[21]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  From awareness to connectedness: the design and deployment of presence displays , 2006, CHI.

[22]  E. Goffman.  Presentation of Self , 2006 .

[23]  Iris Marion Young,et al.  On female body experience : "Throwing like a girl" and other essays , 2005 .

[24]  W. Faulkner.  The Power and the Pleasure? A Research Agenda for “Making Gender Stick” to Engineers , 2000 .

[25]  Dale Spender,et al.  Nattering on the Net: Women, Power and Cyberspace , 1996 .

[26]  Michael C. Mozer,et al.  The Neural Network House: An Environment that Adapts to its Inhabitants , 1998 .

[27]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services , 1996, CACM.

[28]  Jonathan Gershuny,et al.  Social innovation and the division of labour , 1983 .

[29]  S. Livingstone.  The meaning of domestic technologies: a personal construct analysis of familial gender relations , 1992 .

[30]  J. Wajcman.  FROM WOMEN AND TECHNOLOGY TO GENDERED TECHNOSCIENCE , 2007 .

[31]  Mary Budd Rowe.  Teaching science as continuous inquiry : a basic , 1978 .

[32]  R. Tong,et al.  Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction , 1989 .

[33]  N. Hartsock.  The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism , 2019, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays.

[34]  W. Faulkner.  The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies , 2001 .

[35]  L. Alcoff,et al.  Cultural Feminism versus Post-Structuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory , 1988, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[36]  J. Scott,et al.  Deconstructing Equality-Versus-Difference : or, The Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism , 1988 .

[37]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[38]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Engineering ethnography in the home , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[39]  Tracy Camp,et al.  The incredible shrinking pipeline , 1997, CACM.

[40]  Berry Eggen,et al.  User Interface for an In-Home Environment , 2001, INTERACT.

[41]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  The domestic economy: a broader unit of analysis for end user programming , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[42]  Jae Hyun Park,et al.  A user-centered approach to designing home network interfaces , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[43]  Rudi Volti,et al.  America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 , 1992 .

[44]  Ruth Schwartz Cowan,et al.  More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave , 1985 .

[45]  Keith Reynolds Wehmeyer,et al.  Living Room Culture—An Anthropological Study of Television Usage Behaviors , 1995 .

[46]  M. R. Solomon.  Consumer Behaviour: A European Perspective , 1999 .

[47]  M. Strathern,et al.  Nature, culture and gender , 1981 .

[48]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Security in the wild: user strategies for managing security as an everyday, practical problem , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[49]  S. Turkle.  Computational reticence: why women fear the intimate machine , 2004 .

[50]  Merete Lie,et al.  Feminism and Constructivism: Do Artifacts Have Gender? , 1995 .

[51]  Susan Maushart.  Wifework: What Marriage Really Means for Women , 2001 .