Functional MRI using sensitivity-encoded echo planar imaging (SENSE-EPI)

Parallel imaging methods become increasingly available on clinical MR scanners. To investigate the potential of sensitivity-encoded single-shot EPI (SENSE-EPI) for functional MRI, five imaging protocols at different SENSE reduction factors (R) and matrix sizes were compared with respect to their noise characteristics and their sensitivity toward functional activation in a motor task examination. At constant echo times, SENSE-EPI was either used to shorten the single volume acquisition times (TR(min)) at matrix size 128 x 100 (22 slices) from 3.9 s (no SENSE) to 2.0 s at R = 3, or to increase the matrix size to 192 x 153 (22 slices), resulting in TR(min) = 5.3 s for R = 2 or TR(min) = 3.4 s for R = 3. At the lower resolution, the bisection of echo train length (R = 2) substantially reduced distortions and blurring, while signal-to-noise and statistical power (measured by cluster size and maximum t value per unit time) were hardly reduced. At R = 3 the additional gain in speed and distortion reduction was quite small, while signal-to-noise and statistical power dropped significantly. With enhanced spatial resolution the time course signal-to-noise was better than expected from theory for purely thermal noise because of a reduced contribution of physiological noise, and statistical power almost reached that of the regular, low-resolution single-shot EPI, with a slight drop off toward R = 3. Thus, SENSE-EPI allows to substantially increase speed and spatial resolution in fMRI. At SENSE reduction factors up to R = 2, the potential drawbacks regarding signal-to-noise and statistical power are almost negligible.

[1]  X Golay,et al.  PRESTO‐SENSE: An ultrafast whole‐brain fMRI technique , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Nick F. Ramsey,et al.  Functional Anatomical Correlates of Controlled and Automatic Processing , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Echo-planar imaging : theory, technique and application , 1998 .

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power , 1996, NeuroImage.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[6]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Reduction of physiological fluctuations in fMRI using digital filters , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multisubject fMRI Studies and Conjunction Analyses , 1999, NeuroImage.

[8]  J. Callicott,et al.  fMRI Applications in Schizophrenia Research , 1996, NeuroImage.

[9]  M O Leach,et al.  High-resolution segmented EPI in a motor task fMRI study. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Application of sensitivity‐encoded echo‐planar imaging for blood oxygen level‐dependent functional brain imaging † , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  R. Turner,et al.  Hardware Requirements For Functional MRI , 1991, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Volume 13: 1991.

[12]  R S Menon,et al.  Investigation of BOLD contrast in fMRI using multi‐shot EPI , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[13]  Koichi Oshio,et al.  Phase errors in multi‐shot echo planar imaging , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[15]  N. Ramsey,et al.  Phase Navigator Correction in 3D fMRI Improves Detection of Brain Activation: Quantitative Assessment with a Graded Motor Activation Procedure , 1998, NeuroImage.

[16]  G. Glover,et al.  Physiological noise in oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[18]  J B Ra,et al.  Fast imaging using subencoding data sets from multiple detectors , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  E R McVeigh,et al.  Quantification and reduction of ghosting artifacts in interleaved echo‐planar imaging , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  R. Stollberger,et al.  Improved diffusion‐weighted single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  N J Pelc,et al.  SMASH and SENSE: Experimental and numerical comparisons , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Hangyi Jiang,et al.  Origin and minimization of residual motion‐related artifacts in navigator‐corrected segmented diffusion‐weighted EPI of the human brain , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  W. Manning,et al.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): Fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  G. Glover,et al.  Spiral‐in/out BOLD fMRI for increased SNR and reduced susceptibility artifacts , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Regionally Specific Sensitivity Differences in fMRI and PET: Where Do They Come From? , 2000, NeuroImage.

[27]  R. Ladebeck,et al.  Echo-Planar Imaging Image Artifacts , 1998 .

[28]  Robert A. Österbauer,et al.  Sensitivity‐encoded single‐shot spiral imaging for reduced susceptibility artifacts in BOLD fMRI , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional MRI , 1997 .

[30]  R. Goebel,et al.  Exploring brain function with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[31]  A Haase,et al.  Functional MR imaging of the human brain using FLASH: influence of various imaging parameters. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variability in fMRI: An Examination of Intersession Differences , 2000, NeuroImage.

[33]  G. Glover,et al.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  M. Raichle,et al.  Anatomic Localization and Quantitative Analysis of Gradient Refocused Echo-Planar fMRI Susceptibility Artifacts , 1997, NeuroImage.

[35]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Compensation of Susceptibility-Induced BOLD Sensitivity Losses in Echo-Planar fMRI Imaging , 2001, NeuroImage.

[36]  P. Mansfield Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes , 1977 .

[37]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  S. Riederer,et al.  Analysis of T2 limitations and off‐resonance effects on spatial resolution and artifacts in echo‐planar imaging , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[39]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Sources of distortion in functional MRI data , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[40]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Dynamic mapping of the human visual cortex by high-speed magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Susceptibility-Induced Loss of Signal: Comparing PET and fMRI on a Semantic Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[42]  R R Edelman,et al.  Echo-planar MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[43]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Functional Mapping of Human Sensorimotor Cortex with 3D BOLD fMRI Correlates Highly with H215O PET rCBF , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[44]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[45]  R L DeLaPaz,et al.  Echo-planar imaging. , 1994, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[46]  Robert Turner,et al.  Echo Time Dependence of BOLD Contrast and Susceptibility Artifacts , 2001, NeuroImage.

[47]  Robert Turner,et al.  Image Distortion Correction in fMRI: A Quantitative Evaluation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[48]  A. Song,et al.  Single‐shot EPI with signal recovery from the susceptibility‐induced losses , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[49]  R. Edelman,et al.  Resolution enhancement in single‐shot imaging using simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH) , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[50]  M. Buonocore,et al.  Ghost artifact reduction for echo planar imaging using image phase correction , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[51]  R. Turner Magnetic resonance imaging of brain function , 1992, American journal of physiologic imaging.

[52]  J. Duyn,et al.  A. functional MRI technique combining principles of echo‐shifting with a train of observations (PRESTO) , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[53]  R. Turner,et al.  Echo-planar imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in a fraction of a second. , 1991, Science.

[54]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variability in fMRI: An Examination of Intersession Differences , 2000, NeuroImage.

[55]  M Zaitsev,et al.  Shared k‐space echo planar imaging with keyhole , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[56]  D. Ortendahl,et al.  Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[57]  G. Schroth,et al.  Whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral arteriovenous malformations involving the motor pathways , 2002, Neuroradiology.

[58]  J A Sorenson,et al.  Compensation of susceptibility-induced signal loss in echo-planar imaging for functional applications. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.